Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

AFC revenue fell 78.3%, pushing NPAT margin to an unprecedented -310%

Cash burn deepened and equity fell to NZ$0.2m as revenue shrank 78.3%, raising going-concern concerns noted in the filing.

Consumer / Food and beverage

AFC revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

Loading chart...
FY26 was $0.16m, versus $0.74m in FY25.

AFC Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

Loading chart...
FY25 was 8.9%, versus -9.7% in FY24.

AFC operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

Loading chart...
FY26 was -$0.57m, versus -$0.28m in FY25.

AFC NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

Loading chart...
FY26 was -$0.5m, versus -$0.16m in FY25.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 21 August 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$3.7m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.00

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent EBITDA is negative.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

17.75x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
30 June 2026
Published
19 August 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$0.16m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

−$0.5m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$0.57m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Operating profit

−$0.64m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

−$0.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.04m

+875.0% ↑ vs $0m

Total assets

$2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofAFC FY26Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

Revenue fell 78.3% to NZ$0.161m from NZ$0.741m, a decline well outside Annolyse's historical baseline for the company (mean growth +11.0%, range -47.6% to +159.0%), driven by lower overseas wine sales and slower progress developing new business

The fixed cost base did not shrink with revenue: profit before tax fell to -NZ$0.818m from -NZ$0.185m (-342.2%) and NPAT fell to -NZ$0.498m from -NZ$0.164m (-203.7%). NPAT margin of -310.0% is an unprecedented low against a historical mean of -33.0%, and ROE of -241.2% is similarly unprecedented versus a mean of -36.0%. Operating cash outflow widened to -NZ$0.570m from -NZ$0.276m, and total equity fell to NZ$0.206m from NZ$0.244m (-15.6%).

What matters

Revenue collapse is destroying margins disproportionately

A 78.3% revenue decline drove a 342.2% deterioration in PBT, meaning costs did not flex down with sales, so each further dollar of lost revenue now falls almost entirely to the loss line. This matters because it signals the business currently lacks operating leverage in the direction investors would want.

Cash burn and a thin equity base compound the risk. Pre-lease free cash flow of -NZ$0.581m is an unprecedented low against a historical mean of -NZ$0.2m, while equity has shrunk to just NZ$0.206m. This matters because continued losses at this rate could erode the remaining equity buffer quickly, reinforcing the filing's own reference to reliance on shareholder support.

Capital intensity rose against a shrinking base. Capex climbed 226.2% and now equals 6.2% of revenue versus 0.4% prior, spending that is hard to justify against a business whose top line has nearly halved twice in two years. This matters because it suggests capital is being committed without a clear near-term revenue payoff.

Expectations

No stated targets or guidance are disclosed, so the result cannot be measured against management's own benchmarks

The available half-year shape shows NPAT of -NZ$0.237m in the first half (47.6% of the full-year loss) against an implied second half of -NZ$0.261m, meaning losses deepened through the year rather than stabilising. This matters because it indicates the deterioration is ongoing rather than a single-period event, and there is no forward-work or order-book disclosure to suggest a near-term inflection.

Quality of result

Little in this result looks durable in a positive sense

The revenue base is shrinking rapidly, cash outflow widened in step with the earnings decline rather than diverging from it, and the increase in capex intensity has not been matched by revenue traction. Reported FCF-to-NPAT conversion of 116.6% is not a quality signal here because both the numerator and denominator are negative; it reflects cash burn slightly exceeding the accounting loss rather than favourable conversion. Total assets of NZ$2.019m sit within the company's historical range, but this is a low base overall, so it provides little cushion. Overall the numbers describe genuine operating weakness rather than timing or working-capital effects masking a better underlying picture.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specific actions is management taking to reverse the 78.3% revenue decline, and over what timeframe?
Why did capex rise 226.2% while revenue fell, and what return is expected from that spending?
How long can the business rely on shareholder support given equity has fallen to NZ$0.206m?
Is the current cost base being restructured to match the smaller revenue base, or held at prior levels?
Will the NZ$0.060m in gross borrowings or working capital deficit trigger any covenant or liquidity constraint?

This briefing cannot assess management's internal turnaround plan, covenant terms on the borrowings, or the sustainability of continued shareholder financial support beyond what is disclosed in the filing.

Ask about AFC FY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about AFC Group Holdings's FY26 result.

What specific actions is management taking to reverse the 78.3% revenue decline, and over what timeframe?Why does "Revenue collapse is destroying margins disproportionately" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY26?What should I watch next for AFC after FY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

AFC Annual Report FY2026

FY26 / financial report

Prior comparable period

2025 AFC Annual Report

FY25 / financial report

Interim context

AFC Sep 2025 - Interim Report and Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report

Result Announcement

HY26 / results release

Release context

AFC AGM results

HY26 / commentary

Get notified when AFC publishes next

Get the next AFC Group Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.