Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • Developers

© 2026 Annolyse. Analytical briefings for NZX company announcements.

Table of contents

  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Segment breakdown
  8. Analytical metrics
  9. Metric context
  10. Reference material
←Back to briefings
Wellington Drive Technologies (AOF) / FY21

Revenue up 74% but PBT still a loss; NPAT flattered by $6.0m tax benefit

A sharp post-COVID demand rebound and stronger operating cash were partly offset by a much weaker H2, softer gross margin, and stretched receivables.

Release date
25 February 2022
Published
28 April 2026
Table of Contents⌄
  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Segment breakdown
  8. Analytical metrics
  9. Metric context
  10. Reference material

Comparable note: FY20 was selected on an inferred via issuer lineage (WDT) basis rather than an exact same-period filing match.

What changed

Revenue rebounded 74.1% to $64.2m as customer demand normalised after a COVID-impaired FY20, though management noted FY21 was still only 4% above FY19. EBITDA more than doubled to $2.6m, but the operating result was still a loss of $0.4m and PBT remained negative at -$0.6m (FY20: -$2.0m). NPAT of $5.4m flipped from a $2.2m loss almost entirely because of a $6.0m tax benefit (effective tax rate -1,076%). Operating cash flow rose to $3.9m from $0.3m, and the group ended in a net cash position of roughly $4.0m, with gross borrowings essentially unchanged at $2.0m. Mix shifted modestly toward IoT (39.3% of revenue, up from 33.8%), with Motors still the largest segment at 60.7%.

What matters

  • Earnings quality is mixed. PBT growth of 71.9% is the cleaner read than the 351.9% NPAT swing; the bottom line is dominated by a deferred-tax style benefit rather than operational profit. The business is still pre-tax loss-making despite the revenue rebound.
  • H2 was materially weaker than H1. H1 delivered 47.6% of FY revenue but 69.7% of FY EBITDA. The implied H2 EBITDA was only ~$0.8m on ~$33.7m of revenue, a sharp step down in operating margin. Gross margin slipped 80 bps to 27.8% on shipping cost pass-through issues management says will continue into FY22.
  • Working capital absorbed much of the growth. Trade debtors grew 113% (receivable days from ~76 to ~93) and inventories rose 34.6%, both faster than revenue. Cash conversion still looked healthy in headline terms, but the working-capital build is the offsetting risk.

Expectations

No numeric medium-term target or forward-work backlog was disclosed. Management said the result was consistent with the 15 December 2021 update, so the print is in line with its own pre-announced shape. Without a guidance figure, the release does not support a clean run-rate read; what it does confirm is that demand has recovered to roughly FY19 revenue levels, but margin pressure (shipping pass-through) is still active, and management has flagged that headwind into FY22.

Quality of result

Operationally durable elements: the revenue rebound, the IoT mix gain, the move back to a positive (if modest) EBITDA, and a genuine improvement in operating cash to $3.9m on minimal capex of $0.1m. Less durable elements: the headline NPAT is heavily tax-assisted; H2 trading was visibly weaker than H1 on margin; and a meaningful share of the revenue growth has translated into receivables rather than cash, with debtor days extending ~17 days. FX is material (USD invoicing, $0.3m FX impact on cash) and not separately reconciled. Adjusted EBITDA is referenced in interim disclosure without a full reconciliation in the extracted material.

Unresolved

  • What drove the $6.0m tax credit, and is any portion recurring versus a one-off recognition of deferred tax assets?
  • Why did H2 EBITDA collapse to ~$0.8m, and how much was shipping/input-cost pass-through versus mix?
  • How concentrated is the receivables book given the 113% jump, and are payment terms with key customers being extended?
  • No customer or geographic concentration is disclosed despite clearly material USD exposure.
  • No dividend, payout, or NTA disclosure is in the extracted material.

This briefing cannot assess valuation, customer concentration, the durability of the tax benefit, or detailed segment profitability on a like-for-like basis (segment results are EBITDA in FY21 versus PBT in FY20).

Key metrics

← Swipe to view more
Key metrics table for Wellington Drive Technologies FY21
Metric FY21 FY20 Change
Revenue $64.2m $36.9m +74.1% ↑
EBITDA $2.6m $1.2m +120.7% ↑
Net profit after tax $5.4m −$2.2m +351.9% ↑
Net cash inflow from operating activities $3.9m $0.34m +1060.9% ↑
Operating profit −$0.36m −$1.6m +77.4% ↑
Profit before tax −$0.56m −$2m +71.8% ↑
Cash and cash equivalents $6m $4.6m +29.1% ↑
Total assets $48.8m $31.1m +56.7% ↑

Segment breakdown

← Swipe to view more
Segment breakdown table for Wellington Drive Technologies FY21
Segment Current revenue Prior revenue Current result Mix shift
Motors $39m $24.4m $4.6m -5.5pp
IoT $25.2m $12.5m $6m +5.5pp

Analytical metrics

← Swipe to view more
Analytical metrics table for Wellington Drive Technologies FY21
Metric FY21 FY20 Context
OCF / EBITDA (cash conversion) 150.3% 28.6% stable
FCF pre-lease $3.8m $0.13m +$3.7m
FCF / NPAT 70.3% -6.0% complementary conversion metric
Capex % revenue 0.2% 0.6% —
Capex $0.13m $0.21m −$0.08m
Debtor days 93.3 76.2 +17.1 days
Trade debtors $16.4m $7.7m +$8.7m
Net debt −$4m −$2.6m −$1.4m
Net debt / EBITDA -1.50x -2.20x Strengthening
Gross borrowings $2m $2m −$0.04m
ROE (annualised) 26.7% -14.6% Strengthening
HY21 share of FY21 revenue 47.6% — Other half was 52.4%
HY21 share of FY21 EBITDA 69.7% — Other half was 30.3%
HY21 share of FY21 NPAT 11.3% — Other half was 88.7%

This analysis was generated using Annolyse, an AI-powered tool that analyses NZX company announcements. The analysis is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. This is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Source-backed analysis from the filing set attached to this briefing.

Metric context

Trajectory before this result

A compact view of the company's recent revenue and margin path, derived from the same metrics history that powers the company page.

AOF revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

← Swipe to view more
AOF revenue trajectory preview table
PeriodAOF
FY22$74.3m
FY21$64.2m
HY21$30.6m
FY20$36.9m
HY20$20.5m
FY19$61.7m

AOF EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.

← Swipe to view more
AOF EBITDA margin preview table
PeriodAOF
FY222.2%
FY214.1%
HY216%
FY203.2%
HY205.5%
FY196.8%

Appendix

Reference material

Company materials considered in this briefing.

Current period

NZX Results Form

FY21 / results announcement↗

WDT 2021 Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

WT9645 FY21 Annual Result Announcement

FY21 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

2020 Wellington Drive Technologies Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

NZX Results Form

FY20 / results announcement↗

WT9513 2020 Financial Results Market Release

FY20 / results release↗

Interim context

company filing

HY21 / results announcement↗

Interim Report - 30 June 2021

HY21 / financial report↗

WT9578 Announcement of June 2021 half year result

HY21 / results release↗

Related insight

See how cash conversion compares across covered companies

→

See how leverage compares across covered companies

→

Email updates

Want briefings like this for the next reporting season?

Get the next Annolyse briefing by email when it is published.

AOF revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

AOF EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.