Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
AoFrio (AOF) / FY22

EBITDA margin fell to 2.2% while working capital absorbed NZ$9.8m

Revenue grew 15.7% to a record NZ$74.3m, but a NZ$9.8m working-capital build—well above the historical average build of NZ$3.2m—turned operating cash

Industrials / Refrigeration technology

AOF revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $74.3m, versus $64.2m in FY21.

AOF EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY19 AOF FY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 6.8%; 3-period range 2.2% to 4.1%. EBITDA margin: 6.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 3.2%, range 2.2%-4.1%.
  • FY22 AOF FY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 2.2%; 3-period range 3.2% to 6.8%. EBITDA margin: 2.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 4.7%, range 3.2%-6.8%.
EBITDA margin: 2.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 4.7%, range 3.2%-6.8%.

AOF operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was -$4.4m, versus $3.9m in FY21.

AOF working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY20 AOF: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-11.7m; 3-period range $-7.6m to $9.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-11.7m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$6.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-7.6m.
  • FY22 AOF: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $9.8m; 3-period range $-11.7m to $3.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$9.8m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-9.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$9.8m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-9.6m.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 15 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$37.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

11.35x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.01

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

23.89x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

1.57x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
27 February 2023
Published
28 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$74.3m

+15.7% ↑ vs $64.2m

EBITDA

$1.6m

-38.6% ↓ vs $2.6m

Net profit after tax

$3.3m

-38.9% ↓ vs $5.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$4.4m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

−$0.83m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

−$1.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$2.8m

-52.3% ↓ vs $6m

Total assets

$63.1m

+29.4% ↑ vs $48.8m

What changed

AoFrio delivered record revenue of NZ$74.3m (+15.7%), but the growth came at a significant operational cost: operating working capital absorbed NZ$9.8m in FY22, versus a historical average build of only NZ$3.2m across periods with positive movements, and well outside the company's normal range

This drove operating cash outflow of NZ$4.4m compared to an inflow of NZ$3.9m in FY21, and pushed pre-lease free cash flow to NZ$-4.8m—NZ$7.0m below the historical mean of NZ$2.2m and below the entire prior three-year range of NZ$0.1m–NZ$3.8m.

EBITDA fell 38.6% to NZ$1.6m, compressing the EBITDA margin to 2.2%—against a historical mean of 4.7% and a prior range of 3.2%–6.8%. NPAT declined 38.9% to NZ$3.3m, though the headline NPAT figure is heavily distorted by an effective tax rate of 382.4% on a pre-tax loss of NZ$1.2m; the NPAT result is not a meaningful indicator of underlying operating performance.

The IoT segment grew revenue 44.8% to NZ$36.5m and now represents 49.1% of total revenue (up 9.8 percentage points), while Motors revenue slipped slightly to NZ$37.8m. IoT gross margin, however, compressed from 42.7% to 37.8%, and gross margin was broadly stable overall at 27.7%.

What matters

Working capital has absorbed cash at an abnormal scale

Trade debtors rose 53.9% to NZ$25.4m with debtor days at 124.7 days—40.7 days above the company's historical mean of 84.0 days and outside the entire prior range of 76–94 days. Inventory days also extended to 43.6 days versus a historical mean of 29.4 days. Together these movements signal that receivables collection has deteriorated and inventory has been built ahead of demand, both of which represent real cash that has not yet been converted—and which may not be recovered at full value.

Cash generation has structurally disconnected from reported earnings. With NPAT at NZ$3.3m but operating cash flow at NZ$-4.4m (FCF/NPAT of -146.6%), the headline profit is not supported by cash. The prior year's OCF/EBITDA conversion of 150.3% was unusually strong; this year, given the near-zero EBITDA denominator, the ratio is not analytically meaningful—but the absolute cash outflow is. The business has moved from a net cash position to net debt of NZ$1.1m, and leverage at 0.7x net debt/EBITDA is above the company's historical range where it had been consistently net cash.

IoT margin compression offsets the segment mix improvement. While IoT's growing revenue share is strategically positive—it carries roughly double the gross margin of Motors—the segment's gross margin fell 4.9 percentage points to 37.8% in FY22. If that compression continues as IoT scales, the anticipated margin benefit of the mix shift will not materialise.

Expectations

Management has indicated an expectation of approximately NZ$3.5m EBITDA in FY23 and described the business as trending toward NZ$100m revenue

The FY22 EBITDA of NZ$1.6m sets a low base for that target, though achieving it would require both revenue growth and a reversal of the working-capital and margin pressures that characterised FY22. There are no disclosed formal targets against which to measure progress, so the FY23 EBITDA aspiration is the only forward benchmark available.

The second-half shape is notable: HY22 generated positive EBITDA of NZ$1.8m, while the implied second half was a NZ$0.2m EBITDA loss, with operating cash outflow of NZ$7.5m concentrated in H2. This deterioration in the back half raises questions about whether conditions worsened through the year or whether timing of receivables collections inflated the H1 result.

Quality of result

The reported NPAT of NZ$3.3m is not a reliable measure of underlying performance

A pre-tax loss of NZ$1.2m was converted to positive NPAT entirely via a deferred tax benefit; the effective tax rate of 382.4% (versus 1,075.9% in FY21) signals that the tax line is dominating the bottom line in a way that obscures operational reality. The cleaner read is PBT, which was a loss of NZ$1.2m, worsening from a loss of NZ$0.6m in FY21 despite a 15.7% revenue increase.

Cash quality is poor. Pre-lease FCF of NZ$-4.8m against NPAT of NZ$3.3m (FCF/NPAT of -146.6%) means the profit is entirely paper at this stage. Whether the NZ$9.8m working-capital build is temporary—pending collection of the extended receivables book—or structural will determine whether FY23 cash generation recovers. There is no evidence in this release that the receivables are impaired, but 124.7 debtor days is a material credit and collection risk.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the 124.7-day debtor days position—is this a concentration of large end-of-year IoT contracts with long payment terms, or evidence of collection difficulty?
Why did EBITDA turn negative in the implied second half of FY22, given that H1 was positive, and does management expect this seasonal pattern to persist?
How does management expect to release the NZ$9.8m working-capital build in FY23, and what is the timeline for receivables conversion?
Is the IoT gross margin compression from 42.7% to 37.8% structural (pricing pressure, input costs) or a temporary feature of the growth phase?
Will the NZ$3.5m EBITDA target for FY23 require external financing given the current net debt position and negative FCF trend?

This briefing cannot assess the recoverability of the extended receivables book or the credit quality of the underlying IoT customer contracts.

Chat

Ask about AOF FY22

Ask follow-up questions about AoFrio's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about AOF FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about AoFrio's FY22 result.

What is driving the 124.7-day debtor days position—is this a concentration of large end-of-year IoT contracts with long payment terms, or evidence of collection difficulty?Why does "Working capital has absorbed cash at an abnormal scale" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for AOF after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

AoFrio 2022 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

WT9747 2022 Annual Report Release

FY22 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

NZX Results Form

FY21 / results announcement↗

WDT 2021 Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

WT9645 FY21 Annual Result Announcement

FY21 / results release↗

Interim context

company filing

HY22 / results announcement↗

Interim Report - 30 June 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

WT9578 Announcement of June 2021 half year result

HY22 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.70x, +2.20x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 44 days, +18 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 15.7% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when AOF publishes next

Get the next AoFrio briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.