Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

Revenue fell 38.5% and NPAT swung to a $0.8m loss in H1 2020

A $4.8m equity uplift lifted total equity 64% but operating cash fell, the business swung from net cash to net debt, and both segments lost money.

AOF revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

Loading chart...
FY19 revenue trajectory was $61.7m.

AOF EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

Loading chart...
  • FY19 AOF FY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 6.8%; 3-period range 2.2% to 4.1%. EBITDA margin: 6.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 3.2%, range 2.2%-4.1%.
EBITDA margin: 6.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 3.2%, range 2.2%-4.1%.

AOF operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

Loading chart...
FY19 operating cash flow was $3m.

AOF working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

Loading chart...
HY20 was -$13m, versus -$7.6m in FY19.

Market context

Valuation

These ratios pair a market close from around the result date with verified filing data. An unavailable metric means the required inputs were missing or unsuitable for comparison.

Prices as at close, 4 September 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$33.8m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EPS

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

1.47x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and investment-company measures

Yield and investment-company valuation where supported.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
27 August 2020
Published
22 April 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY20 vs HY19

Revenue

$20.5m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$1.1m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

−$0.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$0.72m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Operating profit

−$0.55m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

−$0.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$3.1m

+66.9% ↑ vs $1.8m

Total assets

$33.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofAOF HY20Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

Revenue fell 38.5% to $20.5m in the six months to 30 June 2020, with the high-margin Wellington Connect IoT line down 40.6% to $8.0m

EBITDA more than halved to $1.1m (from $2.45m) and the group swung from a $0.7m NPAT in HY19 to a $0.8m loss, a -209.0% movement; PBT growth was -201.2%. Operating cash inflow fell to $0.7m from $1.1m, and after $1.8m of capex (largely intangibles) free cash flow was -$1.0m versus -$0.5m. Total equity rose 64% to $12.3m, indicating a recapitalisation, while gross borrowings fell 46% to $3.6m. Even so, the cash balance shrank and net debt swung from -$0.4m (net cash) to $0.5m. This release also bridges the WDT-to-AOF issuer transition.

What matters

Both segments are now loss-making at the result line

Motors (61% of revenue, gross margin 21.5%) posted a $1.3m segment loss, and IoT (39% of revenue, gross margin 44.1%) posted a $1.0m loss. The IoT line was supposed to be the strategic growth engine — its 40.6% revenue decline in the half undercuts the FY19 narrative of "year on year revenue growth and improved profitability" and means margin mix can no longer offset Motors' low-teens gross margin.

The balance sheet was rebuilt, not earned. Equity rose $4.8m while gross borrowings fell $3.0m — a clean recapitalisation that traded leverage for share count. This is what is funding the business through a demand shock, not operating cash generation.

Tax does not distort the read. The effective tax rate moved from +5.2% to -2.1%, but the loss is small enough that PBT growth (-201.2%) and NPAT growth (-209.0%) tell the same story. The 7.8pp gap between them is immaterial here.

Expectations

No stated FY20 target or forward-work disclosure is provided

The supplied second-half shape shows HY19 contributed about 54% of FY19 revenue, so the underlying business has been roughly balanced across halves. Annualising the current half gives a $41.0m run-rate, well below FY19's $61.7m, but COVID-period demand disruption makes any straight-line extrapolation unreliable. The release does not commit to a recovery profile, so investors are left to monitor order intake into H2 without a management benchmark.

Quality of result

The reported EBITDA surplus and the optically higher OCF/EBITDA ratio (63.5% versus 45.2%) overstate underlying resilience

Operating cash of $0.7m was supported by a $9m collapse in trade debtors (from $18.1m to $9.5m) as activity fell — receivable days actually rose from 76 to 84, so this is volume-driven cash release, not faster collections. That tailwind does not repeat unless revenue contracts further.

Working against that, inventories rose to $4.8m and inventory days nearly doubled from 24 to 43, suggesting demand softened faster than build plans. Capex held at $1.8m (8.6% of revenue, up from 4.8%) and was directed mostly to intangibles, keeping FCF pre-lease at -$1.0m. ROE moved from +9.7% to -6.4%. Net debt is small but the direction is what matters: the business is now consuming the cash buffer the equity raise provided.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the $4.8m equity uplift — capital raise, instrument conversion, or settlement — and at what dilution?
Why did Wellington Connect IoT revenue fall 40.6% when it is positioned as the structural growth segment, and how much of that is COVID timing versus customer-program deferral?
What does the $4.8m contract-liability balance imply about deliveries and revenue recognition in H2?
How will working capital behave if revenue stabilises — does the $9m receivables release reverse and pressure operating cash?
Why did inventory days nearly double, and is there obsolescence risk attached to the build-up?

This briefing cannot assess H2 order-book visibility, the terms of the equity uplift, or the durability of customer demand beyond what the interim disclosures contain.

Ask about AOF HY20

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Wellington Drive Technologies's HY20 result.

What drove the $4.8m equity uplift — capital raise, instrument conversion, or settlement — and at what dilution?Why does "Both segments are now loss-making at the result line" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY20?What should I watch next for AOF after HY20?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Wellington Drive Technologies 2020 Interim Report

HY20 / financial report

WT9440 - Wellington Interim Result

HY20 / results release

Prior comparable period

WDT interim report June 2019

HY19 / financial report

Full-year context

Wellington Annual Report 2019

FY19 / financial report

Get notified when AOF publishes next

Get the next Wellington Drive Technologies briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.