Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Wellington Drive Technologies (AOF) / HY20

Revenue fell 38.5% and NPAT swung to a $0.8m loss in H1 2020

A $4.8m equity uplift lifted total equity 64% but operating cash fell, the business swung from net cash to net debt, and both segments lost money.

Industrials / Refrigeration technology

AOF revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $74.3m, versus $64.2m in FY21.

AOF EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY19 AOF: Outside range high ebitda margin. 6.8%; 3-period range 2.2% to 4.1%. EBITDA margin: 6.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 3.2%, range 2.2%-4.1%.
  • FY22 AOF: Outside range low ebitda margin. 2.2%; 3-period range 3.2% to 6.8%. EBITDA margin: 2.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 4.7%, range 3.2%-6.8%.
EBITDA margin: 2.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 4.7%, range 3.2%-6.8%.

AOF operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was -$4.4m, versus $3.9m in FY21.

AOF working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY20 AOF: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-11.7m; 3-period range $-7.6m to $9.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-11.7m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$6.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-7.6m.
  • FY22 AOF: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $9.8m; 3-period range $-11.7m to $3.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$9.8m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-9.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$9.8m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-9.6m.
Release date
27 August 2020
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY20 vs HY19

Revenue

$20.5m

-38.5% ↓ vs $33.3m

EBITDA

$1.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net profit after tax

−$0.8m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$0.72m

-34.8% ↓ vs $1.1m

Operating profit

−$0.55m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

−$0.8m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$3.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$33.2m

-17.0% ↓ vs $40m

What changed

Revenue fell 38.5% to $20.5m in the six months to 30 June 2020, with the high-margin Wellington Connect IoT line down 40.6% to $8.0m

EBITDA more than halved to $1.1m (from $2.45m) and the group swung from a $0.7m NPAT in HY19 to a $0.8m loss, a -209.0% movement; PBT growth was -201.2%. Operating cash inflow fell to $0.7m from $1.1m, and after $1.8m of capex (largely intangibles) free cash flow was -$1.0m versus -$0.5m. Total equity rose 64% to $12.3m, indicating a recapitalisation, while gross borrowings fell 46% to $3.6m. Even so, the cash balance shrank and net debt swung from -$0.4m (net cash) to $0.5m. This release also bridges the WDT-to-AOF issuer transition.

What matters

Both segments are now loss-making at the result line

Motors (61% of revenue, gross margin 21.5%) posted a $1.3m segment loss, and IoT (39% of revenue, gross margin 44.1%) posted a $1.0m loss. The IoT line was supposed to be the strategic growth engine — its 40.6% revenue decline in the half undercuts the FY19 narrative of "year on year revenue growth and improved profitability" and means margin mix can no longer offset Motors' low-teens gross margin.

The balance sheet was rebuilt, not earned. Equity rose $4.8m while gross borrowings fell $3.0m — a clean recapitalisation that traded leverage for share count. This is what is funding the business through a demand shock, not operating cash generation.

Tax does not distort the read. The effective tax rate moved from +5.2% to -2.1%, but the loss is small enough that PBT growth (-201.2%) and NPAT growth (-209.0%) tell the same story. The 7.8pp gap between them is immaterial here.

Expectations

No stated FY20 target or forward-work disclosure is provided

The supplied second-half shape shows HY19 contributed about 54% of FY19 revenue, so the underlying business has been roughly balanced across halves. Annualising the current half gives a $41.0m run-rate, well below FY19's $61.7m, but COVID-period demand disruption makes any straight-line extrapolation unreliable. The release does not commit to a recovery profile, so investors are left to monitor order intake into H2 without a management benchmark.

Quality of result

The reported EBITDA surplus and the optically higher OCF/EBITDA ratio (63.5% versus 45.2%) overstate underlying resilience

Operating cash of $0.7m was supported by a $9m collapse in trade debtors (from $18.1m to $9.5m) as activity fell — receivable days actually rose from 76 to 84, so this is volume-driven cash release, not faster collections. That tailwind does not repeat unless revenue contracts further.

Working against that, inventories rose to $4.8m and inventory days nearly doubled from 24 to 43, suggesting demand softened faster than build plans. Capex held at $1.8m (8.6% of revenue, up from 4.8%) and was directed mostly to intangibles, keeping FCF pre-lease at -$1.0m. ROE moved from +9.7% to -6.4%. Net debt is small but the direction is what matters: the business is now consuming the cash buffer the equity raise provided.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the $4.8m equity uplift — capital raise, instrument conversion, or settlement — and at what dilution?
Why did Wellington Connect IoT revenue fall 40.6% when it is positioned as the structural growth segment, and how much of that is COVID timing versus customer-program deferral?
What does the $4.8m contract-liability balance imply about deliveries and revenue recognition in H2?
How will working capital behave if revenue stabilises — does the $9m receivables release reverse and pressure operating cash?
Why did inventory days nearly double, and is there obsolescence risk attached to the build-up?

This briefing cannot assess H2 order-book visibility, the terms of the equity uplift, or the durability of customer demand beyond what the interim disclosures contain.

Chat

Ask about AOF HY20

Ask follow-up questions about Wellington Drive Technologies's HY20 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about AOF HY20

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Wellington Drive Technologies's HY20 result.

What drove the $4.8m equity uplift — capital raise, instrument conversion, or settlement — and at what dilution?Why does "Both segments are now loss-making at the result line" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY20?What should I watch next for AOF after HY20?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

company filing

HY20 / results announcement↗

Wellington Drive Technologies 2020 Interim Report

HY20 / financial report↗

WT9440 - Wellington Interim Result

HY20 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

WDT interim report June 2019

HY19 / financial report↗

Full-year context

NZX Announcement

FY19 / results release↗

Wellington Annual Report 2019

FY19 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 63.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +18.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.44x, +0.60x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -38.5% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when AOF publishes next

Get the next Wellington Drive Technologies briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.