Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Asset Plus (APL) / FY22

Borrowings up 493% to $55.7m to fund Munroe Lane development

Rental revenue fell 14.2% as 35 Graham Street emptied for redevelopment, and the 81.8% NPAT drop reflects a large FY21 base item rather than

Property / Property investment

APL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $6.6m, versus $3.2m in HY26.

APL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 59.4%, versus -5% in HY24.

APL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $3.1m, versus $1m in HY26.

APL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 APL: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-0.5m; 4-period range $-0.1m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.5m, unprecedented low; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.1m.
  • HY25 APL: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-104.3m; 3-period range $-2.2m to $-0.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-104.3m, below normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • HY26 APL: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $-0.2m; 3-period range $-104.3m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Release date
19 May 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$11.9m

-14.2% ↓ vs $13.9m

Net profit after tax

$2.9m

-81.8% ↓ vs $15.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$2.3m

-54.1% ↓ vs $5m

Final dividend per share

44.0c

n/m ↑ vs 0.5c

Operating profit

$4.5m

-36.8% ↓ vs $7.1m

Profit before tax

$3.5m

-78.0% ↓ vs $15.9m

Cash and cash equivalents

$4.4m

+41.1% ↑ vs $3.1m

Total assets

$224.7m

+25.5% ↑ vs $179m

What changed

Asset Plus's FY22 result was dominated by a step-change in balance-sheet scale

Gross borrowings climbed from $9.4m to $55.7m (+493%) and capex on investment properties rose from $15.0m to $40.4m, both reflecting the Munroe Lane development build. Total assets expanded 25.5% to $224.7m and net debt moved from $6.3m to $51.3m.

Rental revenue fell 14.2% to $11.9m, with 35 Graham Street's contribution to segmental rental income dropping from 27.9% to 13.9% as that asset transitions toward potential redevelopment. PBT fell 78.0% to $3.5m and NPAT fell 81.8% to $2.9m, which management attributes to a large item in the FY21 base. Operating cash flow halved to $2.3m, and pre-lease free cash flow widened to -$38.1m, the lower edge of the supplied historical range.

What matters

The headline NPAT collapse is largely a comparison-period effect, not operating deterioration

PBT dropped 78.0% and NPAT 81.8%, but FY21 included a disclosed large item that drove a 208.6% prior-year profit step-up. The cleaner operating signal is rental revenue down 14.2%, driven by 35 Graham Street vacating ahead of any redevelopment. This matters because the recurring rental base is shrinking, not just the valuation line.

The balance sheet has materially re-geared. Gross borrowings rose almost six-fold to $55.7m, lifting net debt from $6.3m to $51.3m to fund Munroe Lane. Against equity of $159.6m the absolute leverage is still moderate, but the trajectory matters: the development pipeline is being funded with debt while rental cash flow is contracting.

The development build is consuming all available cash. Capex of $40.4m against operating cash flow of $2.3m drove pre-lease FCF of -$38.1m. Operating earnings cover none of the capital commitment in this period, so the pre-leasing status and completion timing at Munroe Lane (now targeted April 2023) effectively determine when cash generation normalises.

Expectations

No FY23 targets are supplied

Release excerpts confirm Munroe Lane completion is now targeted April 2023, with management indicating the delays do not materially affect the project. The seasonal shape is uneven: HY22 delivered NPAT of $2.5m, leaving the implied second half at just $0.4m. That profile reflects when valuation and one-off items landed in the year rather than a steady run-rate.

With 35 Graham Street's contribution materially reduced and Munroe Lane not yet income-producing, FY23 rental revenue cannot be reliably extrapolated from FY22. The release also references AFFO as management's preferred earnings measure, but the specific AFFO figure is not in the supplied excerpts, which limits direct comparison against distributable-earnings expectations.

Quality of result

The reported PBT margin of 29.3% and NPAT margin of 24.3% screen above Annolyse's historical baseline (mean PBT margin of -131.6% across FY23-FY25), and ROE of 1.8% sits above the baseline mean of -5.9% on the same basis

The supplied interpretation hint is to frame durability, and durability here is limited: these margins reflect the absence of large valuation write-downs this year rather than improved operating cash earnings, and the recurring rental base fell 14.2%.

Operating cash flow of $2.3m, down 54.1%, is the more telling gauge: it must service rising debt and contribute to a development pipeline that has already consumed $40.4m of capex. Trade debtors at $0.549m are barely changed from $0.567m, so the rise in debtor days to 16.8 (above Annolyse's normal range of around 0.9 days) is largely a denominator effect from lower revenue rather than a receivables build. Working-capital movement of -$0.1m sits within the supplied historical range, so the cash-quality story is not working capital but development spend and leverage.

Unresolved

Open questions

What rental income is contractually committed at Munroe Lane post-April 2023, and what pre-leasing percentage has been achieved?
How will remaining Munroe Lane costs be funded, and what is the expected peak debt and gearing through completion?
What is the plan and timeline for 35 Graham Street's redevelopment or re-leasing now that its share of rental revenue has fallen from 27.9% to 13.9%?
Why did implied second-half NPAT fall to roughly $0.4m from $2.5m at HY22, and which line items drove that step-down?
What AFFO did the period generate, and how is it tracking against any distribution policy management uses to anchor dividends?

This briefing cannot assess development yield assumptions, cap-rate sensitivities, lease covenants, or the specific composition of the FY21 large item, since those disclosures are not in the supplied context.

Chat

Ask about APL FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Asset Plus's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about APL FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Asset Plus's FY22 result.

What rental income is contractually committed at Munroe Lane post-April 2023, and what pre-leasing percentage has been achieved?Why does "The headline NPAT collapse is largely a comparison-period effect, not operating deterioration" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for APL after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Asset Plus FY22 Annual Results Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Asset Plus FY22 Financial Statements

FY22 / financial report↗

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Asset Plus company filing

FY21 / results announcement↗

Asset Plus company filing

FY21 / results release↗

Asset Plus FY21 Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

Interim context

Asset Plus company filing

HY22 / results announcement↗

Asset Plus FY22 Interim Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

Asset Plus NZX Interim Results Release

HY22 / results release↗

Release context

Annual Financial Results and Conference Call - Updated Time

FY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 3.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -14.2% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 1.8%, -8.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Debtor days were 17 days for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when APL publishes next

Get the next Asset Plus briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.