Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Asset Plus (APL) / FY23

Stoddard Road sale sharpens Asset Plus' cash-flow test

The NZ$36.8m disclosed value from the Stoddard Road sale adds cash-context, while operating cash, capex and working capital remain the direct evidence.

Property / Property investment

APL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $6.6m, versus $3.2m in HY26.

APL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 59.4%, versus -5% in HY24.

APL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $3.1m, versus $1m in HY26.

APL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 APL: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-0.5m; 4-period range $-0.1m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.5m, unprecedented low; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.1m.
  • HY25 APL: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-104.3m; 3-period range $-2.2m to $-0.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-104.3m, below normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • HY26 APL: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $-0.2m; 3-period range $-104.3m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Release date
29 May 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$6.4m

-46.6% ↓ vs $11.9m

Net profit after tax

−$13m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$2.7m

+20.7% ↑ vs $2.3m

Final dividend per share

40.4c

-8.2% ↓ vs 44.0c

Operating profit

−$0.47m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

−$13.5m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$4.9m

+10.9% ↑ vs $4.4m

Total assets

$229.5m

+2.1% ↑ vs $224.7m

What changed

FY23 swung from a NZ$2.9m profit to a NZ$13.0m net loss, with PBT down 489.9% to NZ$13.5m negative and NPAT down 545.3%

Rental revenue fell 46.6% to NZ$6.4m as divestments and a key tenancy vacancy stripped out income that the prior year still carried. Both the revenue contraction and the PBT swing sit materially below Annolyse's historical baseline for Asset Plus (3-period mean revenue growth -0.9%, range -16.4% to 27.9%; PBT growth mean -8.2%).

Gross borrowings rose 28.1% to NZ$71.4m and total liabilities rose 27.4% to NZ$83.0m, while equity fell 8.2% to NZ$146.5m on the loss. Total assets edged up 2.1% to NZ$229.5m, above the company's historical range (mean NZ$177.7m), reflecting capex of NZ$58.2m poured into development. The declared final dividend was 4.04 cents per share, down from 4.40 cents.

What matters

Earnings are dominated by non-cash valuation and disposal losses

  • Management attributes NZ$13.04m of the result to revaluation and disposal losses on top of reduced rental income from divestments and the 35 Graham Street vacancy. This means the headline loss is largely a mark-to-market and exit story rather than an operating cash deterioration, but it has nonetheless erased reported equity at the rate of roughly NZ$13.0m in one year.
  • Leverage stepped up materially while the income base shrank. Gross borrowings climbed NZ$15.7m to NZ$71.4m to fund development capex, even as rental revenue halved. Net debt of NZ$66.5m now sits against a smaller, more concentrated income stream, which raises the importance of development delivery and lease-up timing for debt servicing capacity.
  • ROE turned sharply negative at -8.9% versus +1.8% prior, below the company's historical range. With NTA per share at NZ$0.404 (down 8.2% from NZ$0.440), the asset base is being reshaped faster than it is earning, and the dividend cut signals the board recognises that.

Expectations

No quantitative FY24 targets are supplied in the release excerpts, so this briefing cannot test the result against management guidance

The available forward context is qualitative: practical completion of the Munroe Lane development was targeted for late April 2023, and debt facilities are renewed to 31 March 2025. Both items matter because the FY23 result is essentially a transition-year print, and the FY24 income line depends on Munroe Lane stabilising and on whether redeployed capital from disposals is reinvested or used to retire debt.

The HY23 interim showed NZ$0.29m of profit on NZ$4.3m of revenue, meaning the second half implies a NZ$13.3m loss on just NZ$2.1m of revenue. That is consistent with revaluation losses crystallising at year-end rather than a clean operational run-rate.

Quality of result

Stoddard Road sale adds cash-flow context, with NZ$36.8m disclosed value, but the filing does not separately reconcile the transaction to the financial movement

Operating cash flow actually rose 20.7% to NZ$2.7m, and receivable days improved to 1.5 from 16.8, so the cash-collection side of the rental book held up despite the income decline. The NZ$13.0m loss is therefore not a cash-quality event; it is a fair-value and disposal-loss event sitting in the income statement.

That said, the FCF picture is poor on an absolute basis. Pre-lease free cash flow was negative NZ$55.5m, below the company's historical range (mean NZ$-14.8m), driven by NZ$58.2m of investment-property capex. The capex-to-revenue ratio of 912.8% reflects that FY23 is a build year with the income base not yet rebuilt. The working-capital release of NZ$0.5m is favourable versus history but small and likely not repeatable. Investors should not read the OCF improvement as underlying earnings strength; it reflects timing of collections on a shrinking rental footprint.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected stabilised rental run-rate from Munroe Lane once practical completion and lease-up are achieved, and over what timeframe?
How does management intend to balance debt reduction against further development or acquisition, given gross borrowings rose 28.1%?
What are the covenant headroom and LVR levels under the renewed facilities, and how sensitive are they to further cap-rate expansion?
Why was the dividend set at 4.04 cents per share, and what is the payout policy now that NPAT is negative and AFFO is the stated reference metric?
Is further revaluation downside expected in FY24, and on what cap-rate assumptions?

This briefing cannot assess the durability of FY24 rental income, the realisable value of remaining non-core assets, or covenant headroom, because none of those are quantified in the supplied disclosures.

Chat

Ask about APL FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Asset Plus's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about APL FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Asset Plus's FY23 result.

What is the expected stabilised rental run-rate from Munroe Lane once practical completion and lease-up are achieved, and over what timeframe?Why does "Earnings are dominated by non-cash valuation and disposal losses" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for APL after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Asset Plus FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

Asset Plus FY23 Annual Results Presentation

FY23 / results presentation↗

company filing

FY23 / results announcement↗

NZX Release - Annual Financial Result

FY23 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Asset Plus FY22 Annual Results Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Asset Plus FY22 Financial Statements

FY22 / financial report↗

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

Interim context

Asset Plus company filing

HY23 / results announcement↗

Asset Plus FY23 Interim Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

Asset Plus FY23 Interim Results Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

Asset Plus NZX Interim Results Release

HY23 / results release↗

Release context

Annual Financial Results and Conference Call - Updated Time

FY22 / commentary↗

Annual results date & conference call details

FY23 / commentary↗

Portfolio revaluation & Sale of Stoddard Road

FY23 / commentary↗

Interim results date & conference call details

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -46.6% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -8.9%, -10.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Debtor days were 2 days for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when APL publishes next

Get the next Asset Plus briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.