Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • Developers

© 2026 Annolyse. Analytical briefings for NZX company announcements.

Table of contents

  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Analytical metrics
  8. Metric context
  9. Reference material
←Back to briefings
Being AI (BAI) / HY22

BAI loss widens 19.5% to NZD 83.4m with equity deficit now NZD 547.5m

A pre-revenue shell funded by NZD 379.9m of related-party advances flags an RTO proposal while cash falls to NZD 8.0m.

Release date
26 November 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Table of Contents⌄
  1. What changed
  2. What matters
  3. Expectations
  4. Quality of result
  5. Unresolved
  6. Key metrics
  7. Analytical metrics
  8. Metric context
  9. Reference material

What changed

BAI reported no operating revenue in either half, consistent with the prior comparable period. The statutory loss widened to NZD 83.4m from NZD 69.8m, a 19.5% deterioration at both the PBT and NPAT lines (no tax expense was recognised in either period, so PBT and NPAT are identical). Operating cash outflow narrowed to NZD 61.1m from NZD 83.3m, a 26.7% improvement, but cash on hand still fell to NZD 8.0m from NZD 15.6m. On the balance sheet, total liabilities rose 19.3% to NZD 589.5m, the equity deficit widened by NZD 101.9m to negative NZD 547.5m, and related-party unsecured advances of NZD 379.9m are the dominant funding source. Trade and other receivables climbed to NZD 12.3m from NZD 4.8m despite nil revenue.

What matters

  • Solvency structure, not operating earnings, is the story. With no revenue and NZD 379.9m of unsecured related-party borrowings funding a NZD 547.5m equity deficit, the company is functionally a shell dependent on continued related-party support. The 19.5% wider loss is a secondary issue alongside that dependency.
  • The RTO proposal is the only forward-looking catalyst disclosed. The release flags that an RTO (reverse takeover) transaction proposal will be put forward in H1 calendar 2022. No terms, counterparty, or valuation were disclosed. Absent this, there is no operating plan to evaluate.
  • Cash runway is tight against the outflow rate. NZD 8.0m of cash against a NZD 61.1m half-year operating outflow implies near-total reliance on incremental related-party funding to continue as a going concern through the next reporting cycle.

Expectations

No stated targets, guidance, forward work, or second-half shape context were provided, and no FY21 anchor metrics were supplied to frame annualised comparisons. The release does not support any assessment of revenue trajectory because revenue is nil in both halves. What it does support is a binary read: the business has no operating cash generation, and its ability to deliver any return to equity holders is wholly contingent on the flagged RTO transaction being consummated on terms that create value above the equity deficit.

Quality of result

Nothing in this result looks operationally durable because there is no operating business generating cash. The headline narrowing of operating cash outflow (NZD 22.3m improvement) is not attributable to disclosed trading performance and could reflect timing of costs or working-capital movements that are not broken out. The rise in trade and other receivables to NZD 12.3m with nil revenue is notable and unexplained in the extracted text. The widening loss with flat (nil) revenue indicates cost accretion — plausibly interest on the related-party advances — rather than a deteriorating margin on sales. No non-GAAP adjustments, non-recurring items, or reconciliations were provided to reframe the statutory numbers.

Unresolved

  • What are the terms, counterparty, and indicative valuation of the RTO transaction flagged for H1 calendar 2022?
  • What is the composition of the loss — specifically, how much is interest accruing on the NZD 379.9m related-party advances versus other operating costs?
  • What drove trade and other receivables to NZD 12.3m from NZD 4.8m in the absence of any revenue?
  • Is there a formal commitment from related parties to continue funding operations and, if so, on what terms and for how long?
  • What is the going-concern assessment given NZD 8.0m of cash against a half-year cash burn of NZD 61.1m?

This briefing cannot assess the economic substance or likely outcome of the flagged RTO transaction, because no terms or counterparty information were disclosed in the extracted materials.

Key metrics

← Swipe to view more
Key metrics table for Being AI HY22
Metric HY22 HY21 Change
Revenue $0m $0m flat
Net profit after tax −$83.4m −$69.8m -19.5% ↓
Net cash inflow from operating activities −$61.1m −$83.3m +26.7% ↑
Profit before tax −$83.4m −$69.8m -19.5% ↓
Cash and cash equivalents $8m $15.6m -48.7% ↓
Total assets $42m $0.01m +600342.9% ↑

Analytical metrics

← Swipe to view more
Analytical metrics table for Being AI HY22
Metric HY22 HY21 Context
Trade debtors $12.3m — —
Net debt $371.9m — —
Gross borrowings $379.9m — —
Profit from continuing operations −$83.4m — —

This analysis was generated using Annolyse, an AI-powered tool that analyses NZX company announcements. The analysis is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. This is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Source-backed analysis from the filing set attached to this briefing.

Metric context

Trajectory before this result

A compact view of the company's recent revenue and margin path, derived from the same metrics history that powers the company page.

BAI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

← Swipe to view more
BAI revenue trajectory preview table
PeriodBAI
HY24$0.41m
HY23$0.14m
HY22$0m

BAI EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.

← Swipe to view more
BAI EBITDA margin preview table
PeriodBAI
HY24-20.9%
HY23n/a
HY22n/a

Appendix

Reference material

Company materials considered in this briefing.

Current period

Half Year financial statements

HY22 / financial report↗

Results for announcement to the market

HY22 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Half Year Report

HY21 / financial report↗

Half Year Results Announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

Half Year Results Announcement

HY21 / results release↗

Related insight

See how earnings quality compares across covered companies

→

Email updates

Want briefings like this for the next reporting season?

Get the next Annolyse briefing by email when it is published.

BAI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

BAI EBITDA margin

Earnings margin across covered periods.