Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Bremworth (BRW) / HY24

Operating cash burn widened to NZD 15.8m as revenue fell 20.0%

A 20.0% revenue decline pushed Bremworth to a NZD 1.7m loss while inventory days climbed roughly 20 days, draining cash before a capital injection.

Consumer / Home furnishings

BRW revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $44.7m, versus $88.9m in FY25.

BRW EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 20.7%, versus -19.2% in HY25.

BRW operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was -$1.9m, versus $15.7m in FY25.

BRW working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 BRW: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $7.7m; 4-period range $-2.9m to $6.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$7.7m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.1m.
  • FY26 BRW: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.9m; 4-period range $-1.3m to $7.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.9m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$5.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.9m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$5.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.3m.
Release date
29 February 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$39m

-20.0% ↓ vs $48.7m

EBITDA

—

— vs $2.5m

Net profit after tax

−$1.7m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$15.8m

n/m ↓ vs −$1.4m

Operating profit

−$2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

−$1.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$85m

+12.0% ↑ vs $75.9m

What changed

Bremworth's HY24 result is dominated by a sharp deterioration in cash generation

Net operating cash outflow widened to NZD 15.8m from NZD 1.4m in HY23, an absolute deterioration of NZD 14.5m. The cash balance only held steady at NZD 18.8m (versus NZD 18.5m prior) because total equity rose 31.5% to NZD 48.7m, indicating a capital injection during the period.

Revenue fell 20.0% to NZD 39.0m. The business swung from a NZD 1.3m profit before tax to a NZD 1.6m loss (PBT growth of -222.8%), and NPAT moved to a NZD 1.7m loss (-267.5%). Capex stepped up to NZD 2.0m from NZD 1.6m, taking pre-lease free cash flow to roughly -NZD 17.8m.

On the balance sheet, inventory days extended to 98.6 from 78.6 (+20.0 days) and receivable days to 51.1 from 45.7. Trade debtors actually fell 10.3%, so the working-capital absorption is concentrated in inventory.

What matters

Cash deterioration is the headline

  • A NZD 14.5m widening of operating cash outflow against a NZD 2.7m swing in NPAT means the loss substantially understates the cash impact. This matters because the operation consumed the large majority of pre-existing liquidity in a single half, and only a share-issue-sized lift in equity kept the cash line flat.
  • Inventory build sits behind the cash drain. Inventory days rose by roughly 20 days while revenue fell 20.0%, so absolute stock holdings (NZD 21.1m) are now disproportionate to current run-rate sales. Combined with management's commentary about supply constraints affecting "ability to grow revenue," this looks like product mix and availability problems rather than over-ordering — but it ties up working capital regardless.
  • The reported loss flatters the operating picture. The current effective tax rate of -5.8% (versus +22.5% prior) means the tax line did not provide its usual cushion; PBT growth of -222.8% is the cleaner read than NPAT growth of -267.5%, but both confirm the operation is unprofitable at this revenue level. ROE moved to -3.4% from +2.7%.

Expectations

No forward targets, guidance, or order-book disclosures accompany this release, so there is no quantitative benchmark to test the result against

Management commentary points to "pending near-term return of full production volumes" and a "corresponding lift in revenue," and references a stated goal to return to dividends by FY26 — but no dated revenue, margin, or cash target is supplied.

The HY23 share of FY23 revenue was 103.3%, indicating FY23 was first-half-weighted because of cyclone-related disruption in the second half. That makes HY24 a poor like-for-like base for projecting FY24, and the release does not provide enough information to model second-half recovery beyond management's qualitative statements.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is weak on multiple axes

The headline loss is real, but the cash result is materially worse than the P&L suggests: pre-lease free cash flow of -NZD 17.8m against an NPAT of -NZD 1.7m gives an FCF/NPAT ratio of roughly 1,063.8% (i.e., cash outflow ten times the accounting loss). The driver is balance-sheet absorption rather than non-cash charges reversing favourably.

Capex at 5.1% of revenue is up from 3.3%, so investing cash demand is also rising as revenue contracts. The equity-funded liquidity position is the single reason this result does not show up as an acute cash problem; durability of the business model now depends on (a) production volumes returning as management asserts, and (b) the inventory position converting to revenue rather than requiring write-downs. Neither is demonstrated in this release.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the NZD 14.5m operating cash deterioration is timing-related inventory build that will reverse in HY25, versus structural absorption tied to slower turnover?
How much equity was raised during the period, on what terms, and is further capital expected if production normalisation slips?
Why did inventory days rise by roughly 20 days when management cites supply constraints — is the issue raw-material mix, finished-goods stocking ahead of new ranges, or slower sell-through?
When does management expect operating cash flow to turn positive, and what revenue run-rate is required given the current cost base?
How does the FY26 dividend ambition reconcile with current losses, negative ROE of -3.4%, and ongoing cash consumption?

This briefing cannot assess production-volume recovery timing, inventory saleability, or the sufficiency of the current cash balance against forward operating needs because the release does not quantify forward orders, capacity restoration, or working-capital normalisation.

Chat

Ask about BRW HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Bremworth's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BRW HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Bremworth's HY24 result.

What share of the NZD 14.5m operating cash deterioration is timing-related inventory build that will reverse in HY25, versus structural absorption tied to slower turnover?Why does "Cash deterioration is the headline" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for BRW after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

1H24ChairAndCEOCommentary

HY24 / results release↗

1H24FinancialResultsAnnouncement

HY24 / results announcement↗

1H24HalfYearReport

HY24 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

1H22MarketRelease

HY23 / results release↗

1H22ResultsAnnouncement

HY23 / results announcement↗

FY22HalfYearReport

HY23 / financial report↗

Full-year context

1H23ResultsAnnouncement

FY23 / results announcement↗

1H23ResultsAnnouncement

FY23 / results release↗

FY23HalfYearReport

FY23 / financial report↗

Release context

AGM Presentation

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 99 days, +20 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -20.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -3.4%, -6.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BRW publishes next

Get the next Bremworth briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.