Revenue
$3.1m
-15.4% ↓ vs $3.7m
Reported profit barely moved but cash generation evaporated, even as the balance sheet flipped from negative to positive equity.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY23 vs HY22
Revenue
$3.1m
-15.4% ↓ vs $3.7m
Net profit after tax
$0.1m
flat vs $0.1m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
−$0.03m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Operating profit
$0.49m
-22.0% ↓ vs $0.63m
Profit before tax
$0.1m
flat vs $0.1m
Cash and cash equivalents
$0.78m
-36.7% ↓ vs $1.2m
Total assets
$36.9m
-17.1% ↓ vs $44.6m
What changed
Net cash from operating activities swung from a $1.4m inflow in HY22 to a $0.0m outflow in HY23, a $1.4m deterioration, even though profit before tax was effectively flat at $0.1m ($0.146m versus $0.128m) and reported NPAT was similarly flat at $0.1m ($0.086m versus $0.059m).
Revenue fell 15.4% to $3.1m, which management attributes to the timing of capital revenue on store openings rather than underlying trading. Management notes operational trading revenue rose 37% to $1.93m within that total.
The balance sheet repaired meaningfully: total equity moved from negative $2.0m to positive $2.5m, total liabilities fell 25.9% to $34.5m, and total assets fell 17.1% to $36.9m. Cash on hand, however, fell to $0.8m from $1.2m.
What matters
Operating cash flow fell by $1.4m while reported profit barely moved. That divergence matters because the HY22 cash result was flattered by a roughly $1.0m release from receivables collection, whereas HY23 saw a small working-capital build. The implication is that headline profit stability overstates the operational cash trajectory: at this scale, a half-year that converts essentially none of its reported earnings into cash cannot fund growth or service obligations from operations.
Revenue decline is timing-flagged but not yet confirmed. Management explains the 15.4% revenue decline as deferred capital-revenue recognition tied to store openings, expected in H2. If that explanation holds, underlying franchising trading (up 37% on management's commentary) is the more relevant read. If it does not, the second half has to absorb both the H1 shortfall and its own seasonal weighting.
Balance sheet flipped positive but cash fell. Equity moved from negative $2.0m to positive $2.5m, and ROE moved from -3.0% to 3.5%. The repair is real, but cash dropped to $0.8m alongside negative operating cash flow, so liquidity headroom is now thinner than the equity line suggests.
Expectations
Annualising current HY23 revenue gives $6.2m, below FY22's $6.6m, so the company needs H2 to outperform HY23 to match last year on revenue alone.
No quantified forward target is supplied. Management has flagged that capital revenues from store openings should be recognised in H2, but the release does not quantify the expected H2 contribution, the number of openings, or any FY23 revenue or earnings goal. The result therefore supports a directional H2 recovery thesis only if the deferred capital revenue actually lands.
Quality of result
PBT was effectively unchanged but operating cash flow deteriorated by $1.4m, driven by the absence of the receivables collection that boosted HY22. Receivable days fell from 176.7 to 80.7 across the comparison, which means the prior period included an unusually large receivables-release tailwind that has now normalised. Reading HY22 cash generation as a baseline overstates the underlying run-rate.
Capex was negligible (-$0.1% of revenue), so reported free cash flow effectively mirrors operating cash flow at -$0.0m, and FCF covered only -32.6% of NPAT. The balance-sheet improvement appears to come from liability reduction (down $12.1m) rather than cash retention, and cash itself fell 36.7%. Discontinued operations remain present in both periods per the disclosed overlays and contributed a $0.1m loss in HY23, but they do not explain the cash gap. The durable read is that core franchising profit is small, positive, and stable in dollars, but the business is not yet self-funding on a cash basis.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess store-economics, unit-count progression, or franchisee health, none of which are quantified in the supplied disclosures.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Cooks Coffee Company's HY23 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
Interim report
HY23 / financial reportInterim results
HY23 / results announcementCGF Preliminary Half Year Results
HY22 / financial reportResults Announcement
HY22 / results announcementResults Announcement
HY22 / results releaseCommentary on Financial Results
FY22 / results releaseFinancial Results
FY22 / financial reportAGM Results
HY23 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was -15.4% for this reporting period.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was 3.5%, +6.5pp versus the prior comparable period.
Working-capital pressure
Debtor days were 81 days for this result.
Get the next Cooks Coffee Company briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.