Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
The New Zealand Refining Company (CHI) / FY21

Transition impairments drove NPAT to -$552.6m despite 44.5% EBITDA lift

Refinery simplification raised EBITDA to $72.8m and cut net debt, but conversion to a fuels import terminal triggered large non-cash charges.

Transport & Infrastructure / Fuel infrastructure

CHI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $140.2m, versus $70.2m in HY25.

CHI EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 31.5%; 4-period range 65.1% to 68%. EBITDA margin: 31.5%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 66.6%, range 65.1%-68.0%.
  • FY24 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 68%; 4-period range 31.5% to 66.7%. EBITDA margin: 68.0%, above normal range; 4-period mean 57.5%, range 31.5%-66.7%.
  • HY25 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 69%; 3-period range 65.9% to 68.9%. EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.
EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.

CHI operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $74.4m, versus $39.7m in HY25.

CHI working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-12.8m; 4-period range $-4.4m to $0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-12.8m, unprecedented low; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-2.5m.
  • HY22 CHI: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-11.4m; 3-period range $-5.5m to $21.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-11.4m, below normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$21.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY23 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $21.5m; 3-period range $-11.4m to $-1.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$21.5m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-6.2m.
  • FY25 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $0.5m; 4-period range $-12.8m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Release date
23 February 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY21 vs FY20

Revenue

$231.7m

-0.9% ↓ vs $233.9m

EBITDA

$72.8m

+44.5% ↑ vs $50.4m

Net profit after tax

−$552.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$34.7m

+9.7% ↑ vs $31.6m

Declared dividend per share

0.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

−$765.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$16.1m

-62.9% ↓ vs $43.3m

Total assets

$1.2b

-0.9% ↓ vs $1.2b

What changed

NZR's planned conversion to a fuels import terminal drove an unprecedented PBT loss of -$765.1m (FY20: -$271.4m), a -181.9% movement that reflects the strategic asset reset rather than operational collapse

NPAT fell to -$552.6m (-178.7%). Headline revenue was effectively flat at $231.7m (-0.9%).

Underneath the impairments, the operating business improved materially: EBITDA rose 44.5% to $72.8m on refinery simplification and balance-sheet optimisation. Operating cash flow grew 9.7% to $34.7m, helped by a -$12.8m working-capital release (Annolyse's historical baseline classifies this as an unprecedented inventory drawdown versus a typical -$1.7m release). Net debt fell to $183.6m from $231.3m, taking net debt / EBITDA to 2.52x (FY20: 4.59x). No final dividend was declared.

What matters

Asset reset, not operational failure

  1. Management has confirmed transition to a fuels import terminal is imminent, with conversion cost estimates being finalised. The -$765.1m PBT and -$552.6m NPAT predominantly reflect non-cash impairment of refining assets being retired, not a deterioration in trading. The implied H2 NPAT of -$547.7m against -$4.9m at HY21 confirms the loss is event-driven and concentrated in the conversion decision.

  2. Operating earnings improved as the refinery was simplified. EBITDA growth of 44.5% on a 0.9% revenue decline reflects simplification benefits and lower operating costs. This matters because the run-down business is generating better cash margins than in FY20, supporting cash flow through the transition window.

  3. Leverage materially de-risked ahead of conversion. Gross borrowings fell 27.3% to $199.7m, and cash conversion of 47.6% (down from 62.7% but within Annolyse's historical normal range of -24.6% to 79.6%) supported a 21% net debt reduction. The lower leverage matters because it provides headroom for terminal conversion capex without immediate refinancing pressure.

Expectations

No FY22 targets were provided

Management framed FY21 as "a fundamental reset of asset base to provide earnings stability and a focus on dividends" but did not quantify post-conversion earnings or dividend timing. Conversion cost estimates remain pending.

Seasonality is uninformative given the H2 impairment recognition: H1 EBITDA was $41.5m versus an implied H2 of $31.3m. The relevant question for FY22+ is the terminal run-rate after conversion completes, which this release does not support an answer to.

Quality of result

EBITDA growth looks durable to the extent it reflects structural simplification, but FY21 OCF of $34.7m was inflated by a -$12.8m working-capital release as inventory ran down from $18.6m to $5.7m (-69.2%)

Annolyse's historical baseline shows typical working-capital movements of around -$1.7m, so this release is unprecedented and largely non-repeating as the refinery winds down feedstock.

Strip out that release and underlying operating cash generation is closer to $22m. Pre-lease FCF of just $3.2m after $33.4m capex (14.4% of revenue) confirms a thin underlying cash margin behind the headline. The decision to pay no dividend is consistent with that picture and with the funding need for terminal conversion. Net debt reduction was real, but partly enabled by the inventory unwind; sustained deleveraging depends on terminal economics rather than continued working-capital tailwinds.

Unresolved

Open questions

What are the final estimated conversion costs to complete the terminal transition, and how will they be funded?
What is the expected EBITDA run-rate of the fuels import terminal once conversion is complete?
When does management expect dividends to resume, and what payout policy will apply under the terminal model?
How much further inventory release is available before the working-capital tailwind ends?
Will operating EBITDA hold up through the transition period, or step down as refining throughput declines?

This briefing cannot assess the post-conversion terminal economics, the final conversion capex, or the contracted fee structure that will drive the earnings stability management has signalled for the new business model.

Chat

Ask about CHI FY21

Ask follow-up questions about The New Zealand Refining Company's FY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CHI FY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about The New Zealand Refining Company's FY21 result.

What are the final estimated conversion costs to complete the terminal transition, and how will they be funded?Why does "Asset reset, not operational failure" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY21?What should I watch next for CHI after FY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZR FY21 Financial Statements

FY21 / financial report↗

NZR FY21 Results Announcement

FY21 / results announcement↗

NZR FY21 Results Commentary

FY21 / results release↗

NZR FY21 Results Investor Presentation

FY21 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

2020 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

Interim context

HY2021 Financial Statements

HY21 / financial report↗

HY2021 Results announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

HY2021 Results Commentary

HY21 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 47.6% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -15.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 2.52x, -2.07x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -0.9% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CHI publishes next

Get the next The New Zealand Refining Company briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.