Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
EROAD (ERD) / HY24

Normalised revenue up 13%, EBITDA up 23.8% as net debt/EBITDA falls to 1.4x

Reported revenue growth of 4.7% understates the underlying 13% pace because HY23 carried a $7.0m one-off Coretex acquisition accounting credit.

Technology / Transport software

ERD revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $195.2m, versus $99.1m in HY26.

ERD EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY25 ERD: Outside range high ebitda margin. 30.7%; 3-period range 20% to 29.3%. EBITDA margin: 30.7%, above normal range; 3-period mean 25.0%, range 20.0%-29.3%.
  • FY26 ERD: Outside range low ebitda margin. 20%; 3-period range 25.8% to 30.7%. EBITDA margin: 20.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 28.6%, range 25.8%-30.7%.
EBITDA margin: 20.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 28.6%, range 25.8%-30.7%.

ERD operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $30.3m, versus $25.7m in HY26.

ERD working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 ERD: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-7.4m; 3-period range $0m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-7.4m, below normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-7.4m, below normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
29 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$0.09m

+4.7% ↑ vs $0.09m

EBITDA

$0.03m

+23.8% ↑ vs $0.02m

Net profit after tax

$0m

flat vs $0m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$0.02m

+75.0% ↑ vs $0.01m

Operating profit

$0m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

$0m

flat vs $0m

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.02m

+325.0% ↑ vs $0m

Total assets

$0.43m

+10.3% ↑ vs $0.39m

What changed

Reported revenue of $88.9m was up 4.7% on HY23's $85.4m, but management discloses that the prior comparable included a $7.0m one-off acquisition accounting adjustment relating to the Coretex merger

On a normalised basis the underlying revenue line grew roughly 13%, which is the more meaningful read.

EBITDA rose 23.8% to $25.6m and operating cash flow jumped 75% to $20.7m. Capex eased to $12.8m, taking free cash flow to a near-breakeven $0.2m outflow versus a $2m outflow a year earlier. Net debt fell to $36m from $44m, so net debt to EBITDA dropped to 1.4x from 2.1x.

The earnings line moved the other way. PBT loss widened 33.3% to $4.3m and NPAT swung from a $0.6m profit to a $1.2m loss, a -200.0% move. Cash sits at $17m, up from $4m.

What matters

- The 4.7% headline revenue figure overstates how flat growth was

Once the HY23 acquisition revenue credit is removed, the underlying business grew about 13% and EBITDA grew 23.8% on top of that. Operating cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) lifted to 80.8% from 57.1%, so the EBITDA expansion is showing up in cash rather than only on paper. This matters because it is the first clean period since the Coretex deal where post-merger cash economics can be read without the accounting overlay.

  • Net debt to EBITDA falling to 1.4x from 2.1x materially improves financial flexibility. The deleveraging is being driven by stronger operating cash flow and steady capex discipline (capex/revenue 14.6% versus 16.5%), not asset disposals or equity. This matters for the company's ability to keep investing in the integrated platform without further drawing on debt.

  • The NPAT swing to a $1.2m loss is mostly tax-driven rather than operating. PBT widened 33.3% on higher depreciation, amortisation and interest from the merger, but the gap between PBT growth (-33.3%) and NPAT growth (-200.0%) of 166.7pp reflects a smaller tax credit this period (effective rate 75.0% versus 100.0% prior). The cleaner operating read is PBT.

Expectations

No FY24 guidance is supplied in the release excerpts and there are no stated targets to test against

The shape context shows HY23 was 50.9% of FY23 revenue and 57.8% of FY23 EBITDA, so first-half weighting on EBITDA is modest and there is no implied second-half drop-off built into normal phasing.

Annualising the HY24 result gives roughly $178m of revenue, ahead of FY23's $174.9m reported and the $165.3m normalised base. Whether that pace holds depends on commentary on forward work and pipeline that is not in the supplied excerpts, which means the read on full-year delivery is light at this stage.

Quality of result

The EBITDA and cash improvements look durable

Operating cash flow growth of 75% outpaced EBITDA growth of 23.8%, so cash conversion is the genuine source of strength rather than an accounting boost. Capex fell in absolute terms even as revenue grew, which suggests post-merger investment intensity is normalising rather than being deferred — capex/revenue 14.6% is below the prior period's 16.5%.

The main quality caveat is working capital. Receivable days stretched to 70.4 from 58.2, a 12-day extension. The cash result still came through strongly, which implies other working capital lines (likely contract liabilities at $22m and payables timing) absorbed the receivables drag this period. That offset may not repeat, so debtor extension is a forward cash watch item rather than an immediate problem.

The NPAT loss should be discounted against the cash and EBITDA improvement: it reflects merger-related D&A and interest plus tax-credit timing, not a deterioration in trading. ROE of -0.4% versus 0.4% is too small to anchor a return story until the bottom line clears post-merger amortisation.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why have receivable days extended from 58.2 to 70.4, and is the lengthening concentrated in any geography or customer cohort?
What is the underlying organic growth rate by segment once the Coretex normalisation and FX are stripped out?
How should investors think about the pace of D&A and interest run-off, which is the main reason EBITDA strength is not yet reaching NPAT?
What is the FY24 expectation for capex intensity now that it has dropped to 14.6% of revenue?
Whether the contract liability balance of $22m signals pulled-forward billings that could moderate the cash result in H2.

This briefing cannot assess forward work, pipeline conversion or any management guidance for FY24, because none is provided in the supplied release materials.

Chat

Ask about ERD HY24

Ask follow-up questions about EROAD's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about ERD HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about EROAD's HY24 result.

Why have receivable days extended from 58.2 to 70.4, and is the lengthening concentrated in any geography or customer cohort?Why does "- The 4.7% headline revenue figure overstates how flat growth was" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for ERD after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

EROAD H1 FY24 Interim Report

HY24 / financial report↗

EROAD H1 FY24 Investor Presentation

HY24 / results presentation↗

EROAD H1 FY24 Market Release

HY24 / results release↗

EROAD H1 FY24 Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

EROAD Interim Report H1 FY23

HY23 / financial report↗

EROAD Market Release H1 FY23

HY23 / results release↗

EROAD Results Announcement H1 FY23

HY23 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

EROAD FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

EROAD FY23 Market Release

FY23 / results release↗

EROAD FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 80.8% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +23.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 1.40x, -0.70x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 4.7% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when ERD publishes next

Get the next EROAD briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.