Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Genesis Energy (GNE) / HY23

EBITDAF margin lifted to 25.8% despite a 16.4% revenue decline

Gentailer margin and cash generation ran well above historical range, cutting leverage to 4.4x and lifting free cash flow to $214.7m.

Energy & Utilities / Integrated gentailer

GNE revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.5b, versus $3.7b in FY25.

GNE EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 GNE: Outside range high ebitda margin. 25.8%; 3-period range 12.3% to 19.7%. EBITDA margin: 25.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 15.6%, range 12.3%-19.7%.
  • HY25 GNE: Outside range low ebitda margin. 12.3%; 3-period range 14.8% to 25.8%. EBITDA margin: 12.3%, below normal range; 3-period mean 20.1%, range 14.8%-25.8%.
EBITDA margin: 12.3%, below normal range; 3-period mean 20.1%, range 14.8%-25.8%.

GNE operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $264m, versus $311.7m in FY25.

GNE working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 GNE: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-424.2m; 3-period range $-360.4m to $160.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-424.2m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$95.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-360.4m.
  • HY26 GNE: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $160.7m; 3-period range $-424.2m to $29.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$160.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$29.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-392.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$160.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$29.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-392.3m.
Release date
27 February 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$1.2b

-16.4% ↓ vs $1.4b

Net profit after tax

$0.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$224.5m

+81.8% ↑ vs $123.5m

Interim dividend per share

8.8c

+1.1% ↑ vs 8.7c

EBITDAF

$0.3m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

$0.24m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

$0.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.11m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

What changed

Revenue fell 16.4% to $1,155.1m, well below the historical range (3-period mean +11.4%, range -12.9% to +28.9%), yet EBITDAF rose 42% to $298.3m

That pushed EBITDAF margin to 25.8%, materially above the historical baseline (3-period mean 15.6%, range 12.3%-19.7%). NPAT printed at $145.3m (vs $84.7m) and operating cash flow nearly doubled to $224.5m. Pre-lease free cash flow reached $214.7m, above the historical mean of $118.1m. Net debt/EBITDA improved to 4.4x from 6.5x at the prior comparable. The interim dividend lifted 1.1% to 8.8 cents.

What matters

Margin expansion is the central read, not the revenue line

  • EBITDAF margin of 25.8% sits 10.2 percentage points above the historical mean and outside the recent range, while revenue contracted 16.4%. For a gentailer this pattern is typical of a favourable wholesale and hedge-cycle period rather than volume-driven growth, so the implication is that earnings durability depends on hydrology, generation mix and contract positions remaining supportive into H2.
  • Leverage and payout headroom both improved sharply. Net debt/EBITDA at 4.4x is 1.48x below the historical mean (5.88x), and the NPAT payout ratio of 63.6% is well below the historical mean of 129.5% — both classified as favourable versus the recent baseline. This means dividend sustainability has materially improved versus a recent history in which payout repeatedly exceeded earnings.
  • Working-capital balance-sheet position is the soft spot. Debtor days at 29.6 are above the historical range (mean 26.9) and inventory days at 37.2 sit at the upper edge of the recent range (mean 26.1). For a utility with seasonal stock build, the elevation is not yet alarming, but it tempers the strong reported cash result and warrants watching into the second half.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance are supplied with this release, so the read has to come from shape

The supplied seasonality context shows HY22 contributed 48.8% of FY22 revenue and 47.7% of FY22 EBITDAF, meaning the business is roughly balanced first-half/second-half on operating earnings but second-half-weighted on NPAT (HY22 was only 38.2% of FY22). On that template, the H1 FY23 EBITDAF print annualises well above the FY22 base, but the gap matters because gentailer first-half outcomes can be flattered by hedge timing and hydrology that does not repeat. The release does not support a clean extrapolation; it supports a stronger run-rate that needs H2 confirmation.

Quality of result

The cash result looks largely real

Operating cash flow of $224.5m converted at 75.2% of EBITDAF — within the historical range (mean 83.3%, range 58.3%-104.3%), so conversion is normal rather than flattered. Pre-lease free cash flow of $214.7m exceeded NPAT (FCF/NPAT 147.8%), and capex stayed light at $23.6m (2.0% of revenue), which means the cash strength is not engineered through capex deferral on any unusual scale but it is being captured at a low-investment point in the cycle.

The earnings quality caveat is mix: with revenue down 16.4% while EBITDAF rose 42%, the result is being driven by price/margin rather than volume. That is a perfectly valid gentailer outcome but it is by nature more cyclical than customer-volume-led growth. The working-capital movement of -$360.4m is within the historical range (mean -$266.4m), so the cash inflow is not a one-off receivables/inventory release relative to recent patterns — but elevated debtor and inventory days suggest some pressure is being absorbed on the balance sheet rather than released.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the EBITDAF margin uplift to 25.8% is attributable to hydrology and hedge positioning that will not repeat in H2 or FY24?
Why are debtor days at 29.6 and inventory days at 37.2 running above the recent historical range, and is any of the elevation related to customer-arrears stress?
How sustainable is the 63.6% NPAT payout ratio if wholesale conditions normalise back toward the 15.6% historical EBITDAF margin baseline?
What capex profile should investors expect in H2, given the 2.0% capex/revenue ratio looks low for an integrated gentailer?
Does management view the 4.4x net debt/EBITDA outcome as a new working level or a cyclical low?

This briefing cannot assess hydrology assumptions, hedge book positioning, or wholesale-price scenarios underpinning the second half.

Chat

Ask about GNE HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Genesis Energy's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about GNE HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Genesis Energy's HY23 result.

What share of the EBITDAF margin uplift to 25.8% is attributable to hydrology and hedge positioning that will not repeat in H2 or FY24?Why does "Margin expansion is the central read, not the revenue line" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for GNE after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

2023 Interim Report

HY23 / financial report↗

H1 FY23 - NZX Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

H1 FY23 Investor Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

H1 FY23 Market Release

HY23 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Genesis Energy - Interim Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

Genesis Energy - Interim Results Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

Interim Report 2022

HY22 / financial report↗

Full-year context

Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

Market Release

FY22 / results release↗

Release context

Genesis Energy H1 FY23 Conference Call

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 4.40x, -2.10x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 37 days, +13 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 75.2% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +16.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -16.4% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when GNE publishes next

Get the next Genesis Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.