Revenue
$1.5b
-12.9% ↓ vs $1.8b
Earnings and cash strengthened sharply, but a NZ$160.7m working-capital build sits well above Annolyse's historical baseline.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDAF margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY26 vs HY25
Revenue
$1.5b
-12.9% ↓ vs $1.8b
Net profit after tax
$95.1m
+35.3% ↑ vs $70.3m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$264m
+109.0% ↑ vs $126.3m
Interim dividend per share
7.3c
+2.4% ↑ vs 7.1c
EBITDAF
$303.2m
+40.0% ↑ vs $216.5m
Operating profit
$170.9m
+28.2% ↑ vs $133.3m
Profit before tax
$135.2m
+44.3% ↑ vs $93.7m
Total assets
$6.3b
+4.4% ↑ vs $6b
What changed
Headline revenue moved lower year-on-year, but commentary from the release flags a basis change affecting comparability, so the revenue line is best treated qualitatively rather than as a clean like-for-like decline.
Underneath the result, operating working capital absorbed NZ$160.7m of cash this half — above Annolyse's historical baseline, where one of the three prior comparable halves built NZ$29.5m and the other two released an average of NZ$392.3m. Inventories drove most of the swing, rising 79.4% to NZ$317.9m, with inventory days at 37.7 versus a 25.9-day historical mean. Net debt eased to NZ$1.4b and net debt / EBITDA fell to 4.6x from 6.6x.
What matters
Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$100m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.
EBITDAF of NZ$303.2m and PBT of NZ$135.2m sit well above the prior half (PBT margin of 8.8% versus a 1.8% historical mean). Segment data shows the electricity gross margin lifting from 21.0% to 31.3% and gas from 10.8% to 21.7%, indicating that portfolio flexibility and pricing — not volume — drove the uplift. For an integrated gentailer this matters because it suggests hedge book and generation-mix management, rather than a structurally larger customer base, is doing the work.
Working-capital absorption is the standout balance-sheet pressure. The NZ$160.7m build is NZ$412.4m above the historical mean and is concentrated in inventories (+NZ$140.7m, 19.4 more inventory days than the prior comparable). For a gentailer this is typically fuel and coal stockpiling ahead of winter generation requirements, but the scale is unusual against Annolyse's recent baseline and is the single largest call on cash this half.
Leverage improved while capex stepped up. Net debt / EBITDA at 4.6x is at the lower edge of the recent 4.4x–6.6x range. At the same time, capex rose 70.4% to NZ$111.6m (7.3% of revenue versus 3.7%), reflecting investment in renewable and firming projects. The combination — stronger earnings funding higher growth capex while leverage falls — is the more durable read on capital allocation than either metric in isolation.
Expectations
Against historical seasonality, FY25 was second-half-weighted on cash (HY25 represented only 40.5% of full-year operating cash flow) but more evenly split on EBITDAF (HY25 was 47.7% of FY25). HY26 EBITDAF of NZ$303.2m already represents two-thirds of the FY25 EBITDAF total of NZ$454.3m, which sets a high bar for second-half comparability and raises the question of whether the first-half strength reflects portfolio conditions that will normalise.
Management commentary references active gas-position management into Q3 FY26 and winter expectations under the Gen35 strategy, but the supplied excerpts do not quantify a full-year EBITDAF or NPAT outlook.
Quality of result
Pre-lease FCF of NZ$183.0m converts to 192.4% of NPAT, and OCF / EBITDA cash conversion of 87.2% sits inside Annolyse's historical 58.3%–104.3% range and above its 79.3% mean, which argues against the result being a non-cash or accounting artefact. Gross margin expansion in electricity and gas is consistent with the EBITDAF lift, so the operating signal looks genuine rather than one-off.
The qualifications are mix and working capital. Inventory days at 37.7 are above the historical 18.3–37.2 range and debtor days at 29.4 are at the upper edge of the 23.6–29.6 range — both consistent with pre-winter fuel build and seasonal billing, but worth confirming as timing rather than structural. The effective tax rate of 29.7% is above the 25.0% prior comparable and the 27.2% historical mean, so reported NPAT understates the underlying operating improvement visible in PBT and EBITDAF. The Kupe segment also contributed nil revenue this half versus NZ$54m prior, which is the basis change behind the comparability caveats on headline growth metrics.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess the durability of hedge-cycle and generation-mix tailwinds into the second half without disclosed forward hedge positions, hydrology assumptions, or quantified FY26 guidance.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Genesis Energy's HY26 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
H1 FY26 company filing
HY26 / results announcementH1 FY26 Interim Report
HY26 / financial reportH1 FY26 Results Presentation
HY26 / results presentationMarket Release - Record H1 FY26 earnings. Strategic momentum. Equity raise
HY26 / results release2025 Interim Report
HY25 / financial reportH1 FY25 - NZX Results Announcement
HY25 / results announcementH1 FY25 Market Statement
HY25 / results releaseH1 FY25 Results Presentation
HY25 / results presentationcompany filing FY25
FY25 / results announcementGenesis FY25 Integrated Report
FY25 / financial reportGenesis FY25 Market Release
FY25 / results releaseGenesis FY25 Results Presentation
FY25 / results presentationConference Call Details - Full Year
FY25 / commentaryGenesis Energy H1 FY25 Conference Call Details
HY25 / commentaryMarket Announcement - Genesis Energy Investor Day 2025
HY26 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 9.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is 4.60x, -2.00x versus the prior comparable period.
Working-capital pressure
Inventory days were 38 days, +19 days versus the prior comparable period.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 87.2% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +28.9pp versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Genesis Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.