Revenue
$244.1m
+14.2% ↑ vs $213.8m
Cash earnings and a 22.9% lift in operating cash flow sit underneath a statutory result dominated by property devaluations and rising gearing.
Revenue context before the current result.
Operating profit margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.
Key metrics
FY24 vs FY23
Revenue
$244.1m
+14.2% ↑ vs $213.8m
Net profit after tax
−$564.9m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$112.1m
+22.9% ↑ vs $91.2m
Final dividend per share
1.6c
+5.1% ↑ vs 1.5c
Cash and cash equivalents
$9.4m
+42.4% ↑ vs $6.6m
Total assets
$4.7b
-2.8% ↓ vs $4.9b
What changed
Revenue rose 14.2% to $244.1m, driven by rental income (rental revenue cited in the release as up 14.7%), and net cash from operating activities rose 22.9% to $112.1m. Against that, the statutory net loss widened to $564.9m from $135.4m a year earlier, with profit before tax at -$626.5m. The release attributes the swing to non-cash effects "impacting statutory profit" — consistent with portfolio devaluations in a higher cap-rate environment.
The balance sheet moved with the revaluation. Total equity fell 9.9% to $3.1b, total assets fell 2.8% to $4.7b, and gross borrowings rose 15.8% to $1.5b, taking net debt to $1.4b from $1.3b. The final dividend per unit lifted 5.1% to 1.55 cents. Note this release also marks the issuer transition from GMT to GNZ.
What matters
Property income of $244.1m and a 22.9% rise in operating cash flow show the underlying portfolio is collecting more rent and converting it to cash, which is the metric that sustains distributions for a property trust. The reported -317.2% NPAT move is a statutory artefact of property revaluations rather than a deterioration in rent collection.
Revaluation losses are now compounding into the balance sheet. Equity fell $341.6m and assets fell $137.0m even as borrowings grew $198.9m, so the loss is being absorbed by both lower asset carrying values and higher debt. For a property vehicle, the read-through is that gearing direction has weakened materially this year and will increasingly determine headroom against debt covenants.
Capex is funding the growth but is ahead of cash generation. Investment-property capex of $191.0m equals 78.2% of revenue and exceeds OCF of $112.1m by ~$78.9m, leaving free cash flow before leases at -$78.9m. Development completions are the source of next year's rental uplift, but they are being funded with debt while valuations are falling.
Expectations
The supplied half-year shape shows the statutory loss was concentrated in H2 — implied H2 NPAT of -$401.7m versus H1's -$163.2m — which means revaluation pressure intensified through the second half rather than easing. Revenue split was roughly even (49% in H1), confirming rental momentum is steady while the valuation overlay deepened.
The release flags continued customer demand for warehouse and logistics space and additional revenue from completed developments, supporting top-line momentum into FY25. What the release does not yet support is a view on whether cap-rate movements have stabilised, which is the swing factor for next year's reported result and equity base.
Quality of result
Operating cash flow grew faster than revenue (22.9% vs 14.2%), there is no flag of working-capital benefit driving the gap, and the rental base is contractual. The 5.1% lift in distribution per unit is consistent with that operating reality rather than the statutory loss.
The statutory result is a different question. The -$564.9m NPAT is not an operating earnings collapse; it reflects non-cash property revaluation effects, with a low effective tax rate of 9.8% reflecting the deferred-tax mechanics of revaluation accounting rather than a normalised tax line. Two quality caveats nonetheless attach to the cash result. First, FCF pre-lease was -$78.9m, so the distribution and incremental development spend are partly debt-funded this year. Second, with equity down ~$342m and debt up ~$199m in a single period, debt headroom rather than rent collection is becoming the binding constraint on capital allocation.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess occupancy, weighted average lease term, like-for-like rent reversions, or the specific cap-rate movement underlying the revaluation, because those disclosures are not present in the supplied excerpts.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Goodman Property Trust's FY24 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
GMT and GMT Bond Issuer Limited Annual Report 2024
FY24 / financial reportGMT Annual Result presentation 2024
FY24 / results presentationNZX GMT Result Announcement
FY24 / results announcementNZX GMT Result Announcement
FY24 / results releaseGoodman Property Trust and GMT Bond Issuer Limited Annual Report 2023
FY23 / financial reportNZX GMT Result Announcement
FY23 / results releaseGMT and GMT Bond Issuer Interim Report 2024
HY24 / financial reportNZX GMT Result Announcement
HY24 / results releaseRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Get the next Goodman Property Trust briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.