Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Infratil (IFT) / HY25

Revenue +33.3% but NPAT swung -118.1% against HY24 one-off gain

Underlying proportionate EBITDAF rose 7%, while operating cash conversion fell from 41.6% to 18.4% as capex stepped up 25.9%.

Transport & Infrastructure / Infrastructure investment

IFT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.5b, versus $3.3b in FY25.

IFT Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 45.1%, versus 11.9% in FY25.

IFT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $32.7m, versus $386.4m in FY25.

IFT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY25 IFT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-56.9m; 3-period range $-2.4m to $47.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-56.9m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$23.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY26 IFT: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $47.3m; 3-period range $-56.9m to $0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$47.3m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-29.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$47.3m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-29.6m.
Release date
14 November 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$1.7b

+33.3% ↑ vs $1.3b

EBITDA

—

— vs $400m

Net profit after tax

−$212.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$93.1m

-44.1% ↓ vs $166.4m

Interim dividend per share

7.2c

+3.6% ↑ vs 7.0c

Operating profit

$136.4m

-54.8% ↓ vs $301.7m

Profit before tax

−$128.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$496.3m

+238.8% ↑ vs $146.5m

What changed

Reported NPAT swung from $1,174.9m to -$212.2m (-118.1%) and PBT from $1,274.7m to -$128.6m (-110.1%), but the year-on-year comparison is structurally polluted: HY24 continuing-operations profit of $1,215.1m sat above the full-year FY24 figure of $854.0m, implying a one-off uplift in the prior first half that was not repeated and partially reversed in 2H FY24

The economic comparison is revenue up 33.3% to $1.7b and proportionate operational EBITDAF (management's preferred non-GAAP measure) of $506m, described as 7% higher on a like-for-like basis. Operating cash flow fell 44.1% to $93.1m, capex stepped up 25.9% to $207.9m, and pre-lease free cash flow was -$114.8m. The interim dividend rose 3.6% to 7.25 cents per share, and cash on hand climbed to $496.3m from $146.5m.

What matters

The headline earnings collapse is a comparability artefact, not an operational reversal

Annolyse's historical baseline shows PBT growth of -110.1% as an unprecedented low against a 237.5% four-period mean, with NPAT growth of -118.1% and ROE of -2.6% similarly outside recent ranges; however, that prior baseline was itself distorted by acquisition accounting. The economically meaningful read is revenue +33.3% with proportionate EBITDAF +7% on the like-for-like measure.

Cash conversion deteriorated materially. OCF/EBITDA fell from 41.6% to 18.4% as operating cash flow declined 44.1% while revenue rose 33.3%. With capex at 12.1% of revenue, pre-lease FCF of -$114.8m sits within the supplied historical range of -$286.5m to $1.3m but leaves the dividend uncovered: payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF was -52.5%, meaning the cash dividend is being funded from balance-sheet capacity rather than current-period generation.

Leverage trended favourably despite the cash gap. Net debt fell to $4.3b from $5.2b, with net debt to EBITDA improving to 8.4x from 13.1x. This remains high for a diversified infrastructure portfolio and reflects the heavy capex profile, but the direction is supportive of ongoing investment commitments at CDC and One NZ.

Expectations

The supplied excerpts state guidance is "on track" but no FY25 proportionate EBITDAF range is reproduced

Second-half shape from HY24 is not a clean template: HY24 contributed 42.9% of FY24 revenue but 139% of FY24 NPAT, with implied 2H FY24 NPAT of -$329.8m. That asymmetry reflects the prior-period one-off, not an operating seasonality pattern, so it cannot be used to extrapolate FY25.

What the release supports is a 33.3% revenue lift, 7% LFL EBITDAF growth, and a step-up in capex intensity. What it does not provide is a quantified FY25 EBITDAF range, segment-level prior-period comparatives, or a dividend coverage path against forward free cash flow.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is mixed once prior-period accounting noise is removed

The 7% LFL proportionate EBITDAF growth is the relevant durable measure but is non-GAAP and excludes revaluations and transaction costs; the supplied data does not split the growth across CDC, One NZ, and the medical-imaging businesses. CDC's 75% disclosed gross margin and One NZ's 32% margin (54.8% revenue share) anchor the operating story, but with no prior-period segment splits and a current-period acquisition overlay, organic versus inorganic contribution to the 33.3% revenue lift is not separable in the supplied data.

Cash quality weakened in a way that matters for valuation. OCF/EBITDA at 18.4% is less than half HY24's 41.6%, FCF/NPAT at 54.1% is mechanical given the negative NPAT denominator, and capex remained heavy at 12.1% of revenue. The cash balance rose to $496.3m, but that reflects financing activity rather than operational generation, so dividend coverage is weaker than the headline cash position suggests.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did operating cash flow fall 44.1% while revenue rose 33.3%, and which businesses drove the working-capital absorption?
What specifically drove the $1,215.1m HY24 continuing-operations profit that has unwound this period, and is any further normalisation expected?
What is the FY25 proportionate EBITDAF guidance range, and how is the 7% LFL growth split across CDC, One NZ, and the imaging businesses?
How much of the 33.3% revenue lift is organic versus the disclosed current-period acquisition?
Will the dividend remain on its progressive path if pre-lease free cash flow stays negative through FY25?

This briefing cannot assess segment-level year-on-year performance because prior-period segment splits and forward EBITDAF guidance ranges are not present in the supplied extracts.

Chat

Ask about IFT HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Infratil's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about IFT HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Infratil's HY25 result.

Why did operating cash flow fall 44.1% while revenue rose 33.3%, and which businesses drove the working-capital absorption?Why does "The headline earnings collapse is a comparability artefact, not an operational reversal" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for IFT after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Infratil company filing - HY25

HY25 / results announcement↗

Infratil FY2025 Interim Report (including Infratil Group FY2025 Interim Financial Statements)

HY25 / financial report↗

Infratil FY2025 Interim Results Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Infratil Interim Results for the period ended 30 September 2024

HY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Infratil company filing

HY24 / results announcement↗

Infratil FY2024 Interim Report (including Infratil Group FY2024 Interim Financial Statements)

HY24 / financial report↗

Infratil Interim Results Media Release

HY24 / media release↗

Full-year context

Infratil FY2024 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Infratil FY2024 Full Year Result Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Release context

Infratil 2024 Annual Meeting

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 18.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -23.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 8.40x, -4.70x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 33.3% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when IFT publishes next

Get the next Infratil briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.