Net profit after tax
−$17.3m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
A strong $56.9m H1 profit was more than reversed in H2, leaving a $17.3m full-year loss and active return barely ahead of the benchmark.
Net tangible asset or net asset value per share, shown in per-share cents for chart readability.
Recurring investment-income or revenue-return proxy, excluding fair-value movement where disclosed.
Total income or return including fair-value or capital movement where disclosed.
Net asset base attributable to shareholders or unitholders.
Key metrics
FY22 vs FY21
Net profit after tax
−$17.3m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$3.2m
+106.6% ↑ vs −$48.3m
Final dividend per share
3.2c
-12.2% ↓ vs 3.6c
Investment income
−$10.7m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Operating profit
−$17.3m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Profit before tax
−$17.3m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Cash and cash equivalents
$8m
-76.1% ↓ vs $33.5m
Total assets
$506.4m
-9.6% ↓ vs $560.4m
What changed
The shape sits entirely in the second half: H1 NPAT of $56.9m was more than reversed by an implied H2 loss of approximately $74.2m, producing a full-year net loss of $17.3m versus a $142.7m profit in FY21.
Active return collapsed to +0.1pp over the -3.6% benchmark, against +12.9pp in FY21, so the headline weakness reflects market drawdown more than poor relative performance. Net assets attributable contracted 8.3% to $505.4m. Investment income from dividends and interest, which excludes fair-value movements, rose 44.4% to $7.9m. The full-year distribution lifted to 14.34cps (+6.4%), although the final-quarter component fell to 3.16cps from 3.6cps.
What matters
The manager beat its benchmark by just 0.1pp this year, against 12.9pp in FY21. The company's value proposition rests on active stock selection; one year of benchmark-matching is not thesis-breaking, but it removes a historical differentiator and warrants attention if it persists.
Distributions are growing while NTA is shrinking. Full-year distributions rose 6.4% to 14.34cps even as NTA per share fell 10.7%. Prior-year distribution coverage was already only 25.4% of NPAT, and the current loss removes earnings coverage entirely, so payments are being funded from accumulated capital. That is consistent with the investment-company structure but accelerates NAV erosion in a drawdown year.
Cash income from the portfolio strengthened. Dividend and interest receipts of $7.9m (+44.4%) show the underlying holdings continued to generate growing distributable income. The $17.3m loss is a mark-to-market outcome, not an erosion of the recurring income stream that ultimately backs distributions.
Expectations
The release frames FY22 as a year of two halves, with gains through 30 September 2021 reversing as markets weakened into March 2022. Total shareholder return for the year was +0.02%, essentially flat, despite the reported NPAT loss.
The HY22 result of $56.9m NPAT and $63.2m revenue, set against the FY22 outcome, implies the second half delivered approximately -$74.2m NPAT and -$73.8m of investment return, so the reversal accelerated rather than stabilised through the period. Without forward guidance the release does not support a view on FY23 trajectory; it does establish that the H2 weakness is fully captured in the closing NTA of $1.58.
Quality of result
Dividend and interest income rose 44.4% to $7.9m, indicating that the underlying portfolio's distributable income strengthened even as marks fell. That distinction matters: the $17.3m net loss is portfolio remeasurement, not impairment of recurring income.
Capital position remains constructive in a multi-year context. NTA per share at $1.58 still sits at the upper edge of Annolyse's historical baseline (mean $1.47, range $1.34-$1.77), and net assets of $505.4m sit above the historical mean of $485.1m. The balance sheet carries no borrowings, with cash of $8.0m down from $33.5m as positions were redeployed into the portfolio. ROE of -3.4% is at the lower edge of the historical range (mean 8.7%); that is mechanically expected given a loss year and should not be extrapolated forward.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess forward portfolio positioning or whether the March 2022 NTA marked a cyclical low for the underlying holdings.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Kingfish's FY22 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
KFL - Commentary for the year ended 31 March 2022
FY22 / results releaseKFL - Financial Statements for year ended 31 March 2022 incl audit report
FY22 / financial reportKFL - Preliminary year end announcement - 31 March 2022
FY22 / results announcementKFL - Commentary for the year ended 31 March 2021
FY21 / results releaseKFL - Financial Statements for year ended 31 March 2021 incl audit report
FY21 / financial reportKFL - Preliminary year end announcement - 31 March 2021
FY21 / results announcementKFL - Commentary for the interim period 2022
HY22 / results releaseKFL - Interim Financial Statements for period 30 Sep 21 incl review report
HY22 / financial reportKFL - Preliminary half year announcement
HY22 / results announcementRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Get the next Kingfish briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.