Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Kiwi Property Group (KPG) / FY24

Working capital absorbed NZ$72.0m, driving pre-lease FCF to NZ$-72.7m

Headline NPAT loss narrowed on smaller revaluation hits, but operating profit fell 37.7% and gearing rose with capex at 71.5% of revenue.

Property / Property investment

KPG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $271.4m, versus $136.7m in HY26.

KPG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 46%, versus 43.9% in HY25.

KPG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $81.8m, versus $47.9m in HY26.

KPG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-5m; 5-period range $0m to $82.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.0m, below normal range; 4/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$30.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.4m; 4-period range $4.2m to $72m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.4m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$25.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $72m; 4-period range $-2.4m to $17.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$72.0m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$9.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY25 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $82.4m; 5-period range $-5m to $17.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Release date
27 May 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$240.5m

-6.2% ↓ vs $256.5m

Net profit after tax

−$2.1m

+99.1% ↑ vs −$227.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$99.3m

-12.1% ↓ vs $113m

Final dividend per share

1.4c

flat vs 1.4c

Operating profit

$108.2m

-37.7% ↓ vs $173.6m

Profit before tax

$24.7m

+111.5% ↑ vs −$214.8m

Total assets

$3.2b

-0.1% ↓ vs $3.2b

What changed

Operating working capital absorbed NZ$72.0m in FY24, an unprecedented high against Annolyse's historical baseline (mean build of NZ$7.1m, range NZ$-2.4m to NZ$17.5m), driven principally by an NZ$73.5m inventories balance that did not previously sit on the face of the receivables/payables comparison

That, combined with capex of NZ$172.0m (71.5% of revenue), pushed pre-lease free cash flow to NZ$-72.7m, also unprecedented low versus the historical mean of NZ$-2.8m and prior trough of NZ$-49.4m.

Revenue fell 6.2% to NZ$240.5m. The headline NPAT loss narrowed from NZ$-227.7m to NZ$-2.1m (+99.1%) and PBT swung from NZ$-214.8m to NZ$24.7m (+111.5%), but both growth rates are within the historical range for a portfolio whose result is dominated by valuation movements. Operating profit, which strips revaluations, fell 37.7% to NZ$108.2m.

Gross borrowings rose 5.7% to NZ$1.2b while equity slipped 3.8% to NZ$1.9b, so leverage moved in the wrong direction.

What matters

Cash quality is the headline issue

  • OCF fell 12.1% to NZ$99.3m while capex of NZ$172.0m and an NZ$72.0m working-capital absorption produced the worst pre-lease FCF on record in the supplied baseline. For a property issuer, that means the development pipeline (inventories appear consistent with build-to-sell residential at Sylvia Park) is being funded by drawing debt rather than by recurring rental cash, which directly pressures distributable earnings cover.
  • Gearing is rising into a softer asset base. Total assets at NZ$3.2b sit below the historical range (mean NZ$3.4b, low NZ$3.2b), gross debt is up NZ$64.0m and equity is down NZ$73.5m. The combination signals reduced balance-sheet headroom going into further committed capex, even though debtor days at 12.1 remain at the low end of the historical range.
  • Segment mix shifted sharply. Office revenue more than halved from NZ$64.1m to NZ$31.1m (share from 25.0% to 12.9%) and office gross margin compressed from 80.1% to 69.9%, while Mixed-use grew its share from 53.9% to 62.0%. The headline -6.2% revenue figure understates the underlying repositioning of the portfolio toward Mixed-use and away from standalone office, which is the key strategic read.

Expectations

No forward targets, gearing limits, or distributable earnings guidance were supplied with this release, so the result must be read against shape rather than guidance

The HY24 NPAT loss of NZ$36.5m versus the full-year NZ$-2.1m implies a positive H2 NPAT swing of roughly NZ$34.4m, consistent with smaller revaluation losses in the second half rather than an operational acceleration (revenue split was 48.9% / 51.1%, broadly even).

The final dividend held at 1.425 cents per share, matching FY23. With pre-lease FCF deeply negative, that distribution is not covered by free cash flow on the current capex profile and depends on continued debt capacity and any recycling of office assets.

Quality of result

The PBT and NPAT improvements are almost entirely a base-effect: FY23 absorbed a large property revaluation loss, FY24 absorbed a smaller one

Operating profit, which is the cleaner read on the property platform, fell 37.7%. The current effective tax rate of 108.6% is unprecedented in the supplied baseline (mean 26.0%, range 6.0%–58.6%) and reflects tax on a near-breakeven post-revaluation result, so it tells you little about underlying tax economics.

The cash side is where durability is weakest. Operating cash flow declined faster than revenue, working capital absorbed an outsized NZ$72.0m, and capex stepped up to 71.5% of revenue. This means a meaningful share of FY24's reported result is balance-sheet-funded development activity rather than recurring rental cash, and the dividend at 1.425 cents is being paid alongside a record pre-lease FCF deficit.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the NZ$73.5m inventories balance, and what is its expected sale timing and margin profile?
How does management reconcile holding the dividend at 1.425 cps with pre-lease FCF of NZ$-72.7m and rising gross debt?
Why did office revenue more than halve, and how much reflects disposals versus reclassification into Mixed-use?
What is the remaining committed capex on the development pipeline and the expected peak gearing through completion?
How does the operating profit decline of 37.7% reconcile with stable mixed-use rental income, and what is the recurring run-rate?

This briefing cannot assess like-for-like net rental growth, occupancy, weighted average lease term, cap-rate movements, or covenant headroom, none of which were supplied in the structured data.

Chat

Ask about KPG FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about KPG FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY24 result.

What is driving the NZ$73.5m inventories balance, and what is its expected sale timing and margin profile?Why does "Cash quality is the headline issue" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for KPG after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Kiwi Property Annual Report 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Annual Results Presentation 2024

FY24 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement Notice 2024

FY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Kiwi Property Annual Report 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement Notice 2023

FY23 / results announcement↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement Notice 2023

FY23 / results release↗

Interim context

Kiwi Property Interim Report 1H24

HY24 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property NZX Results Announcement Notice 1H24

HY24 / results announcement↗

Kiwi Property NZX Results Announcement Notice 1H24

HY24 / results release↗

Release context

Annual meeting date, closing date for director nominations

FY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 12.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -0.1%, +11.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -6.2% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 112 days.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when KPG publishes next

Get the next Kiwi Property Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.