Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Mercury NZ (MCY) / HY23

EBITDAF up 86% but PBT fell 40% on acquired-swap unwinds

Trustpower's full half and a $65m HY22 hedge exit make this non-comparable, though OCF/EBITDAF conversion at 76.5% is unprecedented in recent history.

Energy & Utilities / Integrated gentailer

MCY revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.7b, versus $3.5b in FY25.

MCY EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 MCY: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 34.7%; 4-period range 23.8% to 32.3%. EBITDA margin: 34.7%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 27.7%, range 23.8%-32.3%.
  • FY23 MCY: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 30.8%; 4-period range 22.5% to 26.6%. EBITDA margin: 30.8%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 24.3%, range 22.5%-26.6%.
  • HY25 MCY: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 23.8%; 4-period range 27% to 34.7%. EBITDA margin: 23.8%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 30.4%, range 27.0%-34.7%.
  • FY25 MCY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 22.5%; 4-period range 22.6% to 30.8%. EBITDA margin: 22.5%, below normal range; 4-period mean 26.4%, range 22.6%-30.8%.
EBITDA margin: 22.5%, below normal range; 4-period mean 26.4%, range 22.6%-30.8%.

MCY operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $351m, versus $483m in FY25.

MCY working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MCY: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $258m; 4-period range $-105m to $180m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$258.0m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$127.0m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-101.0m.
  • HY24 MCY: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $539m; 4-period range $-17m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$539.0m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-17.0m.
  • FY25 MCY: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-105m; 4-period range $-97m to $258m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-105.0m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$170.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-97.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-105.0m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$170.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-97.0m.
Release date
21 February 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$1.3m

+48.8% ↑ vs $0.87m

Net profit after tax

$0.2m

-50.0% ↓ vs $0.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$0.35m

+161.4% ↑ vs $0.13m

Interim dividend per share

8.7c

+8.7% ↑ vs 8.0c

EBITDAF

$0.45m

+86.4% ↑ vs $0.24m

Profit before tax

$0.3m

-40.0% ↓ vs $0.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.05m

+10.4% ↑ vs $0.05m

Total assets

$9.6m

+13.4% ↑ vs $8.5m

What changed

Revenue rose 48.8% to $1,299m and EBITDAF rose 86.4% to $451m, but PBT fell 40.0% to $306m and NPAT fell 50.0% to $230m

The HY22 base was depressed by a $65m revenue hit from the early exit of the Norske Skog long-term hedge, and HY23 includes the first full half of acquired Trustpower retail. Below EBITDAF, non-cash unwinds on acquired Norske Skog, Tilt and Trustpower swaps reduced PBT, while the effective tax rate normalised from 5.1% in HY22 to 24.8%. Operating cash flow rose 161% to $345m and OCF/EBITDAF conversion lifted to 76.5%, an unprecedented level versus the supplied historical baseline (mean 59.8%, range 54.3–65.4%). Net debt/EBITDAF improved from 6.7x to 3.91x and the interim dividend rose 8.7% to 8.7 cps.

What matters

Not a clean like-for-like

The Trustpower retail acquisition delivered its first full half of contribution and the HY22 base carried a $65m hedge-exit drag, so the +48.8% revenue and +86.4% EBITDAF prints overstate organic momentum. The reconfirmed FY23 EBITDAF guidance of $620m — or $795m normalised before the non-cash swap unwinds — is the more useful anchor than the headline growth rates.

Cash quality is the durable story. OCF rose 161% to $345m, conversion lifted to 76.5% versus a baseline mean of 59.8%, and FCF/NPAT reached 117.4% with working capital essentially flat. The cash generated reduced net debt/EBITDAF from 6.7x to 3.91x — the lowest reading in the supplied historical range — while capex was modest at 5.8% of revenue. This matters because the doubled EBITDAF translated into balance-sheet repair rather than working-capital build.

PBT is the cleaner operating read. PBT fell 40.0% and NPAT fell 50.0%; the 10pp gap is explained by the effective tax rate normalising from 5.1% to 24.8%. The PBT decline itself reflects the non-cash unwind of swaps acquired with Norske Skog, Tilt and Trustpower, not the underlying generation and retail businesses.

Expectations

Management reconfirmed FY23 EBITDAF guidance of $620m, with normalised guidance of $795m after the non-cash unwind of acquired swaps

HY23 EBITDAF of $451m sits at 72.7% of the reported $620m target, implying only $169m in H2 on the reported basis — well below the $339m H2 FY22 print. The gap reflects the back-loaded swap-unwind drag, which is why management points to the normalised $795m view; on that basis H2 implied EBITDAF is roughly $344m, close to the prior comparable H2. Hydrology was supportive in H1, with the largest generation volume in company history and a further 675GWh spilled to keep lakes within resource consents, so H2 hydrology is now the principal swing factor for delivery against guidance.

Quality of result

Two parts of this result look durable

The EBITDAF margin of 34.7% — unprecedented in the supplied baseline (mean 27.7%, range 23.8–32.3%) — is supported by the Trustpower retail mix and a hydrology-supported generation half rather than timing, because OCF/EBITDAF of 76.5% and a near-flat working-capital movement say cash followed earnings. Leverage falling from 6.7x to 3.91x net debt/EBITDAF is also a real balance-sheet outcome, not an accrual artefact.

What is not durable is the headline growth rate. Revenue +48.8% and EBITDAF +86.4% include the Trustpower step-up and the $65m hedge-exit reversal in the base, so neither annualises. The 50% NPAT decline is similarly mechanical: a low HY22 tax rate of 5.1% combined with non-cash swap unwinds dragging PBT. The economic read is closer to the normalised $795m FY23 EBITDAF guide than to either headline growth rate, and the cash-conversion and leverage progress are the lines most likely to carry forward.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of HY23 EBITDAF of $451m came from organic generation and retail versus the first full half of Trustpower contribution?
How long will the non-cash unwind of acquired Norske Skog, Tilt and Trustpower swaps continue to depress PBT, and what is the remaining schedule by year?
Why does the reported FY23 EBITDAF guide of $620m imply such a soft H2 against HY23 of $451m, and what hydrology and retail assumptions sit behind it?
Is 76.5% OCF/EBITDAF conversion sustainable once working-capital tailwinds normalise and acquired-business integration costs run through?
Can net debt/EBITDAF keep falling from 3.91x given gross borrowings still rose 8.9% and the payout ratio doubled to 51.5% of NPAT?

This briefing cannot assess the quarter-by-quarter schedule of the acquired swap fair-value unwind or the organic-versus-acquired split inside the integrated Trustpower retail book.

Chat

Ask about MCY HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Mercury NZ's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MCY HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Mercury NZ's HY23 result.

What share of HY23 EBITDAF of $451m came from organic generation and retail versus the first full half of Trustpower contribution?Why does "Not a clean like-for-like" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for MCY after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Financial Results Announcement HY2023

HY23 / results announcement↗

HY2023 Interim Report including unaudited financial statements

HY23 / financial report↗

HY2023 Results Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

News Release HY2023 Interim Results

HY23 / media release↗

Prior comparable period

2022 Interim Report including unaudited financial statements and Auditor's Review Report

HY22 / financial report↗

News Release

HY22 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY2022

HY22 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Annual report and financial statements FY2022

FY22 / financial report↗

News Release

FY22 / media release↗

Results Announcement FY2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Release context

FY2023 EBITDAF guidance confirmed

HY23 / commentary↗

Interim results webcast and teleconference

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 10.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.90x, -2.78x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 48.8% for this reporting period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 76.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +22.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MCY publishes next

Get the next Mercury NZ briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.