Revenue
$175.7m
flat vs $175.7m
Operating earnings collapsed against the company's historical range while a 0.0% effective tax rate masked the deterioration in headline net profit.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY24 vs FY23
Revenue
$175.7m
flat vs $175.7m
EBITDA
—
— vs $18.2m
Net profit after tax
$7.9m
flat vs $7.9m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
—
— vs $9.8m
Profit before tax
$3.5m
-68.2% ↓ vs $11m
Total assets
$107.6m
-0.8% ↓ vs $108.6m
What changed
Net profit after tax was flat at NZ$7.9m, but only because the effective tax rate dropped to 0.0% from 28.7% in the prior comparable, absorbing the entire PBT decline.
The supplied release commentary covers an H1 disclosure (with an amendment flagged in the event overlays): revenue of $83.8m versus $94.4m in the prior H1, gross margin compressed 140bps to 47.9% from 49.3%, and Bargain Box volumes up 12% against an active-customer base of 61,600. Trade debtors rose 56.6% to NZ$0.6m, pushing debtor days to 1.2 — above the company's historical range of roughly 0.4 to 0.7 days. EBITDA and operating cash flow were not separately disclosed in the current-period structured extract.
What matters
Operating profitability deteriorated sharply (PBT -68.2%, PBT margin 2.0% versus a historical mean of 8.6% and a range of 5.3%–14.3%), but NPAT prints flat because tax expense was zero. The headline net-profit figure therefore understates the operating decline; PBT is the cleaner read of this period and it sits below the company's recent normal range.
Gross-margin compression alongside volume growth signals unit-economics pressure. The 140bps slip in gross margin against a 12% lift in Bargain Box volumes implies mix shift toward the lower-priced offering is diluting per-unit profitability, not absorbing fixed costs. Operating leverage is going the wrong way.
Receivables are stretching off a small base. Trade debtors up 56.6% takes debtor days to 1.2 — flagged as above the historical range. The dollars are tiny in absolute terms, but with operating cash flow not disclosed in the extract, the directional move on collections is worth tracking rather than dismissing.
Expectations
The current disclosure is an H1 with an amendment flagged in the event overlays, so a clean full-year shape cannot be read directly from these numbers. Annolyse's supplied shape context shows H1 represented 47.7% of the prior full-year revenue base — meaning the second half typically carries marginally more — but applying that shape to a compressing margin profile is the central uncertainty the release does not resolve. What this release does support is that the cost-out work referenced in the prior comparable has not offset the demand and mix pressure visible in this half. It supports neither a stabilisation nor a recovery read.
Quality of result
NPAT is held flat purely by a 0.0% effective tax rate against 28.7% prior; on the PBT line, where the tax distortion is removed, the business contracted by more than two-thirds. PBT margin of 2.0% sits well below the historical mean of 8.6%, so this is not a step within the recent normal envelope — it is a deterioration against the company's own baseline.
Cash conversion cannot be properly assessed for this period: operating cash flow is not separately disclosed in the structured extract, where the prior comparable showed NZ$9.8m of OCF on NZ$18.2m of EBITDA (53.6% conversion). Combined with the 56.6% lift in trade debtors and unchanged inventory, working-capital direction is mildly negative. Equity rose to NZ$60.8m from NZ$58.0m, but NTA per share is calculated at negative $0.11, meaning intangibles materially exceed the tangible book base — any sustained earnings stress would press on a thin tangible cushion.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess current-period cash conversion, full-year trajectory, or any management outlook because operating cash flow, current-period EBITDA, and forward guidance are not present in the supplied extract.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about My Food Bag Group's FY24 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
company filing
FY24 / results announcementInterim Report
FY24 / financial reportMedia Release
FY24 / media releaseResults Presentation
FY24 / results presentationAnnual Report
FY23 / financial reportcompany filing
FY23 / results announcementMedia Release
FY23 / media releasecompany filing
HY24 / results announcementInterim Report
HY24 / financial reportMedia Release
HY24 / media releaseResults Presentation
HY24 / results presentationResults of 2023 Annual Meeting
FY24 / commentaryResults of 2023 Annual Meeting
HY24 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 68.2pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was 12.9%, -0.6pp versus the prior comparable period.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 0.0% for this reporting period.
Working-capital pressure
Inventory days were 5 days, 0 days versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next My Food Bag Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.