Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

PBT fell 68.2% but NPAT held flat on a zero-tax bridge

Operating earnings collapsed against the company's historical range while a 0.0% effective tax rate masked the deterioration in headline net profit.

MFB revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

Loading chart...
FY24 was $175.7m, versus $175.7m in FY23.

MFB EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFB FY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 17.6%; 3-period range 9.6% to 10.4%. EBITDA margin: 17.6%, above normal range; 3-period mean 10.0%, range 9.6%-10.4%.
  • HY23 MFB HY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 12.2%; 3-period range 8.4% to 9.5%. EBITDA margin: 12.2%, above normal range; 3-period mean 8.9%, range 8.4%-9.5%.
EBITDA margin: 12.2%, above normal range; 3-period mean 8.9%, range 8.4%-9.5%.

MFB operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

Loading chart...
FY23 was $9.8m, versus $29.5m in FY22.

MFB working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

Loading chart...
HY24 was -$0.7m, versus -$0.3m in FY23.

Market context

Valuation

These ratios pair a market close from around the result date with verified filing data. An unavailable metric means the required inputs were missing or unsuitable for comparison.

Prices as at close, 4 September 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$81.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

12.16x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.03

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

2.59x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

5.08x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

9.58x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.12x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and investment-company measures

Yield and investment-company valuation where supported.

Dividend yield

5.9%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
23 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$175.7m

flat vs $175.7m

EBITDA

— vs $18.2m

Net profit after tax

$7.9m

flat vs $7.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

— vs $9.8m

Profit before tax

$3.5m

-68.2% ↓ vs $11m

Total assets

$107.6m

-0.8% ↓ vs $108.6m

Analysis ofMFB FY24Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

Profit before tax fell 68.2% to NZ$3.5m from NZ$11.0m — classified below Annolyse's historical baseline for this company (3-period mean +98.4%, range -60.4% to +210.0%)

Net profit after tax was flat at NZ$7.9m, but only because the effective tax rate dropped to 0.0% from 28.7% in the prior comparable, absorbing the entire PBT decline.

The supplied release commentary covers an H1 disclosure (with an amendment flagged in the event overlays): revenue of $83.8m versus $94.4m in the prior H1, gross margin compressed 140bps to 47.9% from 49.3%, and Bargain Box volumes up 12% against an active-customer base of 61,600. Trade debtors rose 56.6% to NZ$0.6m, pushing debtor days to 1.2 — above the company's historical range of roughly 0.4 to 0.7 days. EBITDA and operating cash flow were not separately disclosed in the current-period structured extract.

What matters

The tax line is doing all the work

Operating profitability deteriorated sharply (PBT -68.2%, PBT margin 2.0% versus a historical mean of 8.6% and a range of 5.3%–14.3%), but NPAT prints flat because tax expense was zero. The headline net-profit figure therefore understates the operating decline; PBT is the cleaner read of this period and it sits below the company's recent normal range.

Gross-margin compression alongside volume growth signals unit-economics pressure. The 140bps slip in gross margin against a 12% lift in Bargain Box volumes implies mix shift toward the lower-priced offering is diluting per-unit profitability, not absorbing fixed costs. Operating leverage is going the wrong way.

Receivables are stretching off a small base. Trade debtors up 56.6% takes debtor days to 1.2 — flagged as above the historical range. The dollars are tiny in absolute terms, but with operating cash flow not disclosed in the extract, the directional move on collections is worth tracking rather than dismissing.

Expectations

No forward targets are supplied and the release does not include explicit guidance

The current disclosure is an H1 with an amendment flagged in the event overlays, so a clean full-year shape cannot be read directly from these numbers. Annolyse's supplied shape context shows H1 represented 47.7% of the prior full-year revenue base — meaning the second half typically carries marginally more — but applying that shape to a compressing margin profile is the central uncertainty the release does not resolve. What this release does support is that the cost-out work referenced in the prior comparable has not offset the demand and mix pressure visible in this half. It supports neither a stabilisation nor a recovery read.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is weak

NPAT is held flat purely by a 0.0% effective tax rate against 28.7% prior; on the PBT line, where the tax distortion is removed, the business contracted by more than two-thirds. PBT margin of 2.0% sits well below the historical mean of 8.6%, so this is not a step within the recent normal envelope — it is a deterioration against the company's own baseline.

Cash conversion cannot be properly assessed for this period: operating cash flow is not separately disclosed in the structured extract, where the prior comparable showed NZ$9.8m of OCF on NZ$18.2m of EBITDA (53.6% conversion). Combined with the 56.6% lift in trade debtors and unchanged inventory, working-capital direction is mildly negative. Equity rose to NZ$60.8m from NZ$58.0m, but NTA per share is calculated at negative $0.11, meaning intangibles materially exceed the tangible book base — any sustained earnings stress would press on a thin tangible cushion.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the effective tax rate fall to 0.0% from 28.7%, and is the benefit a one-off recognition or a continuing position?
What drove the 140bps gross margin compression — input costs, promotional intensity, or Bargain Box mix dilution against the higher-priced brands?
Why is operating cash flow not separately disclosed in the current-period extract, and what was actual cash conversion in the half?
How does management expect second-half revenue and margin to develop relative to the H1 print, particularly given active customers grew but revenue did not keep pace?
What is management's plan to rebuild tangible equity given NTA per share is negative?

This briefing cannot assess current-period cash conversion, full-year trajectory, or any management outlook because operating cash flow, current-period EBITDA, and forward guidance are not present in the supplied extract.

Ask about MFB FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about My Food Bag Group's FY24 result.

Why did the effective tax rate fall to 0.0% from 28.7%, and is the benefit a one-off recognition or a continuing position?Why does "The tax line is doing all the work" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for MFB after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Prior comparable period

Interim context

Release context

Results of 2023 Annual Meeting

FY24 / commentary

Results of 2023 Annual Meeting

HY24 / commentary

Get notified when MFB publishes next

Get the next My Food Bag Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.