Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Precinct Properties (PCT) / FY24

Operating cash fell 32.6% even as revenue grew 13.3%

The narrowing statutory loss reflects property valuation stabilisation; FCF pre-lease stayed at -$97.6m and gross borrowings rose 7.1%.

Property / Property investment

PCT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $135.4m, versus $266.1m in FY25.

PCT Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 54.4%, versus 57% in HY25.

PCT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $47.9m, versus $86.8m in FY25.

PCT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $52.2m, versus $1.4m in FY25.
Release date
28 August 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$248m

+13.3% ↑ vs $218.9m

Net profit after tax

−$22.1m

+85.6% ↑ vs −$153.1m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$79.6m

-32.6% ↓ vs $118.1m

Final dividend per share

1.7c

+1.6% ↑ vs 1.7c

Operating profit

$150.5m

+47.4% ↑ vs $102.1m

Profit before tax

−$23.3m

+85.9% ↑ vs −$164.7m

Cash and cash equivalents

$22.1m

+33.1% ↑ vs $16.6m

Total assets

$3.5b

-3.4% ↓ vs $3.6b

What changed

Revenue grew 13.3% to $248.0m on rental escalation, the Generator flexible-space business and a new investment-management line, but operating cash flow fell 32.6% to $79.6m

The statutory loss narrowed sharply — PBT improved 85.9% to -$23.3m and NPAT improved 85.6% to -$22.1m — but management attributes the swing to "stabilisation of property valuations in the second half", meaning less-negative revaluation rather than stronger cash earnings.

Capex moderated to $177.2m (from $264.1m) but still left free cash flow pre-lease at -$97.6m. Gross borrowings rose 7.1% to $1.3b while total equity fell 6.2% to $2b, taking net debt to approximately $1.3b. NTA per share is $1.29 and the final dividend component announced was 1.7 cps.

What matters

Cash earnings weakened despite revenue growth

OCF fell $38.5m even as gross operating revenue rose $29.1m. For a property issuer where distributable cash drives sustainable distributions, this gap is a more important read than the narrower statutory loss. The supplied materials do not explain the divergence, so the cause — incentives, interest cost timing, or working-capital movements — is unresolved.

Leverage moved against the balance sheet. Borrowings rose $87.9m while equity fell $135.8m. The newly refinanced $700m syndicated facilities provide capacity, but debt-funded capex against negative FCF erodes future flexibility if valuations soften again. Capex intensity remained elevated at 71.5% of revenue.

Dividend not covered by generated cash. The payout ratio versus FCF pre-lease is -27.7% (FCF was negative), meaning distributions are being funded from balance-sheet capacity rather than operating cash. ROE improved to -1.1% from -7.0%, but remains negative because revaluations still drag the bottom line.

Expectations

No quantitative FY25 target is supplied

HY24 NPAT was +$15.3m, implying second-half NPAT of approximately -$37.4m — the second half was materially weaker than the first, consistent with smaller but still-negative revaluations after the H1 stabilisation point. Revenue was distributed roughly evenly (48.8% H1, 51.2% H2).

Management cites capital-partner transactions with a total sales value of $431m and continued execution on the living strategy, but no AFFO or distribution target is provided. The release supports a qualitative read that valuations are stabilising; it does not support a clean quantitative read on FY25 cash earnings.

Quality of result

The headline NPAT improvement is low-quality: most of the swing reflects less-negative property revaluations rather than improvements in operating cash

The cleaner economic read is PBT (still a loss of -$23.3m, +85.9%) set against operating cash flow falling 32.6%. The combination — better statutory result, weaker cash result — argues against weighting the loss-narrowing as the headline.

Within the segments, investment properties (83.5% of revenue, result up to $141.6m from $133.0m) carries the result. Flexible space held flat at $8.2m, hotel and hospitality lost a slightly larger -$0.6m, and the new investment-management line contributed $7.9m of revenue and $1.3m of result — a higher-quality fee stream, but too small to move the dial. Receivable days remain modest at 11.3, suggesting the OCF deterioration is not driven by debtor stretch.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did operating cash flow fall 32.6% when gross operating revenue grew 13.3% — what working-capital, lease-incentive or interest-cost movements drove the gap?
How will Precinct sustain distributions when FCF pre-lease is -$97.6m and the dividend is not covered by generated cash?
What is the current gearing ratio, debt headroom under the new $700m syndicated facilities, and portfolio-level cap-rate sensitivity?
Why did implied H2 NPAT swing to approximately -$37.4m after a positive H1, and is the second-half valuation level now anchored?
What is the full-year AFFO outcome and how does it compare to the cash distribution declared?

This briefing cannot assess portfolio cap rates, weighted average lease term, occupancy, or the specific line-item drivers of the operating cash flow decline because they are not disclosed in the supplied materials.

Chat

Ask about PCT FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Precinct Properties's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PCT FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Precinct Properties's FY24 result.

Why did operating cash flow fall 32.6% when gross operating revenue grew 13.3% — what working-capital, lease-incentive or interest-cost movements drove the gap?Why does "Cash earnings weakened despite revenue growth" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for PCT after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY24 Annual Result Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

NZX Form - Results_Announcement - 30 June 2024

FY24 / results announcement↗

PCT Annual Report 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Strong portfolio performance and strategic growth progress

FY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

NZX Form – Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

NZX Form – Results Announcement

FY23 / results release↗

PCT Annual Report 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

Interim context

company filing

HY24 / results announcement↗

PCT FY24 Interim Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

Strategic transition advanced and 1H24 result announcement

HY24 / results release↗

Release context

Precinct FY24 Annual Results and Webcast Details

FY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 13.3% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -1.1%, +5.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Debtor days were 11 days for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PCT publishes next

Get the next Precinct Properties briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.