Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Pacific Edge (PEB) / FY25

Cash falls 67.6% to NZ$9.5M as revenue drops 8.6% on Medicare uncertainty

Pacific Edge burned NZ$24.7M in operating cash in FY25, leaving a closing balance of NZ$9.5M that raises immediate questions about runway without a

Healthcare / Diagnostics

PEB revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $5.9m, versus $21.8m in FY25.

PEB operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$19m, versus -$24.7m in FY25.

PEB working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $0.6m, versus $0.2m in FY25.

PEB NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$19.1m, versus -$29.9m in FY25.
Release date
30 May 2025
Published
22 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$21.8m

-8.6% ↓ vs $23.9m

Net profit after tax

−$29.9m

-1.4% ↓ vs −$29.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$24.7m

+3.9% ↑ vs −$25.8m

Cash and cash equivalents

$9.5m

-67.6% ↓ vs $29.3m

Total assets

$37m

-43.4% ↓ vs $65.4m

What changed

The most material development in FY25 is the accelerating erosion of the cash position: Pacific Edge closed the year with NZ$9.5M in cash and equivalents, down 67.6% from NZ$29.3M at the prior year end, entirely the product of a NZ$24.7M operating cash outflow against a minimal NZ$1.3M capex spend

Operating revenue fell 8.6% to NZ$21.8M, with management attributing the decline to Medicare uncertainty and a reduced US sales force. Net loss after tax widened modestly to NZ$29.9M from NZ$29.5M, a 1.4% deterioration.

The segment picture shows the Commercial division remains the core, contributing NZ$21.9M in revenue and narrowing its segment loss to NZ$14.9M from NZ$17.3M. A Research segment reported NZ$4.8M in revenue with no prior-year comparable, contributing a NZ$15.0M segment loss and explaining much of the gap between operating revenue (NZ$21.8M) and total revenue (NZ$24.6M). Receivable days extended to 47.2 days from 38.9 days, a deterioration that warrants watching given the already-stressed cash position.

What matters

Cash runway is the dominant constraint

At NZ$9.5M closing cash with NZ$24.7M consumed in FY25 operations, the implied runway — assuming no improvement in burn — is well under six months. The second-half operating cash outflow was NZ$12.3M versus NZ$12.5M in the first half, showing no material deceleration in burn rate. This is not a quality-of-earnings question; it is a question of whether the business can continue without new capital.

Medicare uncertainty is suppressing the business's primary revenue driver. The 8.6% operating revenue decline and a 15.0% fall in US total test volumes (per management commentary) reflect a "holding pattern" in demand linked to US reimbursement uncertainty. Until Medicare coverage is resolved, the revenue base is structurally constrained, which means cost discipline alone cannot close the gap between revenues and operating spend.

Receivable days expanded sharply. Debtor days rose 8.3 days to 47.2 days, which on a shrinking revenue base means collections slowed even as volumes fell. For a business with NZ$9.5M in cash, any slippage in cash collection directly affects the ability to fund operations, so this movement is operationally significant rather than a routine working-capital fluctuation.

Expectations

No formal financial guidance has been provided, so there is no numeric target against which to assess FY25

Management's stated framing — a "holding pattern" awaiting Medicare resolution — implies that FY25 results are not intended to represent a normalised run rate. The APAC contribution and sales force efficiency gains are cited as partial offsets, and US Tests/Sales FTE improved 6.4% in Q4 FY25 versus Q4 FY24, suggesting some operational recovery in the final quarter.

However, the absence of a clear Medicare resolution timeline means the path to cash-flow neutrality is undefined. The second-half revenue of NZ$10.9M being marginally below the first-half NZ$11.0M does not support a "sequential improvement" narrative, and the closing cash position means the company will need either a step-change in revenue or an external capital event in the near term.

Quality of result

The modest NZ$0.4M widening of the net loss understates the pressure building on the balance sheet

Equity fell NZ$28.5M to NZ$26.1M over the year, driven by accumulated losses rather than asset write-downs. The Commercial segment improved its loss by NZ$2.3M, which is a genuine operating efficiency signal; however, this was offset by the Research segment's NZ$15.0M loss with no prior-year baseline for comparison, making the year-on-year total loss movement difficult to interpret as an improving trend.

Operating cash outflow narrowed slightly from NZ$25.8M to NZ$24.7M, but the FCF-to-NPAT ratio of 86.9% (versus 91.8% in FY24) means the cash drain is nearly as large as the reported accounting loss. There is no timing benefit, deferred liability, or balance-sheet offset moderating the cash consumption — what is being reported is close to the underlying economic burn.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the specific timeline and probability of a Medicare coverage decision, and what revenue uplift does management model under a favourable outcome?
How does the board plan to fund operations beyond the near-term implied by the NZ$9.5M cash balance — is a capital raise, partnering transaction, or cost-reduction program under active consideration?
Why did receivable days extend to 47.2 days in a period when volume fell, and are there collection issues with specific payers or geographies?
What drove the NZ$15.0M Research segment loss, and is the NZ$4.8M in Research revenue contractually recurring or episodic?
Will the US sales force be rebuilt once Medicare uncertainty resolves, and what is the cost and time to restore peak sales coverage?

This briefing cannot assess whether Pacific Edge's cash position is sufficient to reach a Medicare decision, nor can it evaluate the probability or timing of that regulatory outcome.

Chat

Ask about PEB FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Pacific Edge's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PEB FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Pacific Edge's FY25 result.

What is the specific timeline and probability of a Medicare coverage decision, and what revenue uplift does management model under a favourable outcome?Why does "Cash runway is the dominant constraint" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for PEB after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Audited Results - Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

FY25 Audited Results - Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

FY25 Audited Results - Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Audited Results - Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Interim context

HY Result - Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

HY25 Results - Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

HY25 Results - Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

HY25 Results - Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -114.8%, -60.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -8.6% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 27 days, +1 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PEB publishes next

Get the next Pacific Edge briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.