Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Pacific Edge (PEB) / HY25

Revenue fell 16.3% with under a year of cash at current burn rate

Loss narrowed just 4.9% despite a smaller cost base, leaving $21.9m of cash against a $12.5m half-year operating burn.

Healthcare / Diagnostics

PEB working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY25 was -$0.4m, versus $0.1m in FY24.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$372.6m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.03

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

13.85x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
26 November 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$11m

-16.3% ↓ vs $13.1m

Net profit after tax

−$14.5m

+5.2% ↑ vs −$15.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$12.5m

+16.8% ↑ vs −$15m

Total assets

$50.9m

-33.3% ↓ vs $76.3m

What changed

Operating revenue fell 16.3% to $10.96m as a smaller US sales force and Medicare reimbursement uncertainty weighed on test demand

The pre-tax and after-tax loss of $14.5m was only 4.9% better than HY24's $15.3m loss, so cost reductions did not keep pace with the revenue decline.

Operating cash outflow improved to $12.5m from $15.0m (16.8% better), and capex stepped down to $0.5m from $0.8m. Cash on hand rose modestly to $21.9m from $20.5m a year earlier, but total equity fell 40.5% to $40.7m as accumulated losses eroded reserves. Gross borrowings of $0.3m were drawn for the first time, though the group remains in a net cash position of $21.6m.

What matters

Runway is the central question

  • At a half-year operating cash burn of $12.5m plus $0.5m capex, the implied annualised pre-lease free cash outflow is around $26.0m against $21.9m of cash. On a like-for-like burn rate, available liquidity covers materially less than twelve months unless revenue accelerates, costs fall further, or fresh capital is raised. The release does not quantify a stated runway in the supplied excerpts.
  • Revenue trajectory has reversed. HY24 was described in the prior release as a "strong rise" with operating revenue up 50% on the comparable half; HY25 reverses that, down 16.3%. Management attributes this to Medicare uncertainty and a deliberately smaller sales team. This matters because the recovery thesis now rests on assumptions about reimbursement clarity and APAC volume offsetting US weakness, neither of which is quantified in the supplied materials.
  • Loss narrowed despite a $2.1m revenue drop, implying cost discipline rather than operating leverage. Without a disclosed gross margin or segment split, it is not possible to separate genuine cost-base reduction from one-off timing. The improvement is real but small relative to the revenue decline, suggesting the cost base is still meaningfully above current revenue.

Expectations

No forward target, full-year guidance, or forward-work order book was supplied, so this release cannot be benchmarked against management commitments

The HY24 / FY24 shape shows roughly even halves (HY24 was 54.8% of FY24 revenue and 51.6% of FY24 NPAT), so HY25 annualised at $21.9m would imply a full-year revenue print materially below FY24's $23.9m if current run-rate holds.

Management commentary in the supplied excerpts points to operating revenue running 1.4% above 2H24, suggesting sequential stabilisation rather than a return to year-on-year growth. The gap between this and a recovery scenario is what the next disclosure will need to address.

Quality of result

The headline improvement in loss is low-quality in the sense that it was achieved on a smaller revenue base, not through operating leverage

With FCF pre-lease at -$13.0m versus NPAT of -$14.5m (89.7% conversion), the cash result tracks the income statement closely; there is no working-capital tailwind flattering the cash burn, and conversely no obvious receivables build hiding pressure.

Capex of 4.8% of revenue is modest and capex spend declined 32.8% year-on-year, which preserves cash but is also consistent with a company conserving resources rather than investing into growth. Inventories fell 20.3% to $1.3m, a small absolute movement but indicative of tighter operating posture. The 40.5% decline in equity is mechanical – it reflects the accumulated loss working through reserves – but it shrinks the balance-sheet cushion available to absorb future cash burn before further dilution.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is management's current estimate of cash runway from $21.9m given the present burn profile, and at what point would a capital raise be triggered?
How much of the 16.3% revenue decline is attributable to Medicare reimbursement timing versus the structurally smaller sales force, and which portion is recoverable?
Will the cost base be reduced further, or is the current loss level the floor until revenue recovers?
How are APAC volumes expected to scale, and what revenue contribution is plausible inside the current cash window?
Why did gross borrowings of $0.3m appear this period, and does this signal early use of debt facilities?

This briefing cannot assess the probability of Medicare reimbursement resolution or the company's access to additional equity capital, both of which are central to the going-concern read.

Chat

Ask about PEB HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Pacific Edge's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PEB HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Pacific Edge's HY25 result.

What is management's current estimate of cash runway from $21.9m given the present burn profile, and at what point would a capital raise be triggered?Why does "Runway is the central question" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for PEB after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

HY Result - Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

HY25 Results - Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

HY25 Results - Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

HY25 Results - Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

HY Interim Results - Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

HY Interim Results - Announcement

HY24 / results release↗

HY Interim Results - Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

Full-year context

FY24 Audited Results - Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

FY24 Audited Results - Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

FY24 Audited Results - Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -16.3% for this reporting period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PEB publishes next

Get the next Pacific Edge briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.