Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
SkyCity Entertainment Group (SKC) / FY25

SkyCity operating cash flow fell 77.8% as conversion dropped to 20.9%

Reported EBITDA rose 56.4% off a depressed prior period, but underlying EBITDA fell 15.9% and free cash flow stayed deeply negative.

Consumer / Gaming and tourism

SKC revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $406.5m, versus $821.3m in FY25.

SKC EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 17.7%, versus 26.3% in FY25.

SKC operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $56.1m, versus $45.2m in FY25.

SKC working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$0.1m, versus -$4m in FY25.
Release date
21 August 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$821.3m

-4.6% ↓ vs $861m

EBITDA

$216.1m

+56.4% ↑ vs $138.2m

Net profit after tax

$29.2m

+120.4% ↑ vs −$143.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$45.2m

-77.8% ↓ vs $203.6m

Operating profit

$121.9m

+164.2% ↑ vs $46.1m

Profit before tax

$68.2m

+126.6% ↑ vs $30.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$51.5m

-14.9% ↓ vs $60.5m

Total assets

$2.8b

-0.8% ↓ vs $2.8b

What changed

Operating cash flow fell to $45.2m from $203.6m, a 77.8% decline that took cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) from 147.3% to 20.9%

That is the dominant movement in the result, because it severs the link between the headline earnings recovery and the cash actually generated by the business.

Reported EBITDA rose 56.4% to $216.1m, but the company's own commentary frames underlying EBITDA at $233.7m — 15.9% below the prior period — once $17.6m of "Building a Better Business" (B3) programme costs and prior-period non-recurring items are normalised. Revenue fell 4.6% to $821.3m. Reported NPAT swung to $29.2m from a $143.3m loss, but PBT growth of 126.6% on a much smaller base is the cleaner read because the prior year carried large impairments.

Gross borrowings rose 9.3% to $666.5m and net debt rose to $615.0m, while capex moderated to $161.6m from $303.7m.

What matters

Cash conversion collapsed to 20.9%

EBITDA grew on the reported line, but only one-fifth of it reached operating cash flow versus a prior period where OCF actually exceeded EBITDA. This matters because SkyCity remains in a heavy capex cycle: even with capex nearly halved, free cash flow before leases stayed deeply negative at -$116.4m. The reported earnings improvement does not yet translate into self-funding capacity.

Underlying EBITDA fell 15.9%. Stripped of B3 costs and the prior-year impairment base, operating earnings went backwards on a 4.6% revenue decline, implying negative operating leverage. Auckland (62.3% of revenue, 40.8% segment margin) is still carrying the group, while Adelaide's result dropped to $28.5m from $39.6m at a thin 13.4% margin and Online lost $1.8m on $4.1m of revenue. The mix is becoming more concentrated on a single property.

Balance sheet under active management. Net debt rose by $66m, but net debt/EBITDA improved to 2.8x from 4.0x because reported EBITDA recovered. The release flags new "balance sheet initiatives" and the prior-period commentary references suspension of dividends, indicating the board is treating leverage as a constraint despite the improved ratio.

Expectations

No formal FY26 EBITDA or revenue targets are supplied in the release excerpts, so the result has to be judged against shape rather than guidance

HY25 produced only $1.9m of operating cash flow and $6.1m of NPAT, meaning the second half delivered roughly $43.2m of OCF and $23.2m of NPAT — a meaningful sequential improvement, but off a very weak first half rather than a sustained run-rate.

The release excerpts indicate dividends remain suspended at least through the current period and that capital initiatives are being launched to bolster resilience. That is consistent with a company that does not yet expect operating cash to fund both capex and distributions, and the gap between underlying EBITDA decline and reported EBITDA growth is what matters here.

Quality of result

The reported NPAT swing is heavily flattered by the prior-year impairment base; the 57.1% current effective tax rate (against a meaningless 575.6% prior rate on a near-zero PBT) further confirms that headline earnings are noisy

PBT growth of 126.6% is the cleaner operating read, and even that is on a $30.1m comparable that itself was depressed.

The cash side is where durability is weakest. OCF/EBITDA at 20.9% means only $0.21 of every reported EBITDA dollar reached cash, and FCF pre-lease was -$116.4m versus -$100.1m prior. Working capital was a modest tailwind (operating working capital fell $4.0m, debtor days dropped to 2.0 from 3.5), so the cash gap is not a receivables build — it sits in items below EBITDA such as interest, tax, and other operating outflows. The capex step-down to 19.7% of revenue is real, but the business still consumed cash at the free-cash-flow line.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove the $158m fall in operating cash flow when EBITDA rose, and how much was tax, interest, or other below-EBITDA items?
What are the new balance sheet initiatives, and do they involve equity, hybrid, or asset-level funding?
Why did the Adelaide segment result fall to $28.5m from $39.6m at a 13.4% margin, and what is the recovery path?
When does the board expect dividends to resume, and against what leverage or cash-flow test?
Is the $17.6m B3 programme cost a one-off or recurring through FY26, and what quantified savings does it target?

This briefing cannot assess regulatory and licensing risk, the timing of New Zealand International Convention Centre (NZICC) earnings contribution, or the terms of the announced balance sheet initiatives.

Chat

Ask about SKC FY25

Ask follow-up questions about SkyCity Entertainment Group's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKC FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about SkyCity Entertainment Group's FY25 result.

What specifically drove the $158m fall in operating cash flow when EBITDA rose, and how much was tax, interest, or other below-EBITDA items?Why does "Cash conversion collapsed to 20.9%" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for SKC after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Results Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Market Release

FY25 / results release↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Market Release

FY24 / results release↗

Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Interim context

Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Market Release

HY25 / results release↗

Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 20.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -126.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 5.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 2.80x, -1.20x versus the prior comparable period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 2.2%, +13.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKC publishes next

Get the next SkyCity Entertainment Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.