Revenue
$652.9m
-15.2% ↓ vs $769.8m
EBITDA margin collapsed to an unprecedented 3.0% on a 15.2% revenue decline, leaving the balance sheet under acute refinancing pressure.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY24 vs HY23
Revenue
$652.9m
-15.2% ↓ vs $769.8m
EBITDA
$19.9m
— vs —
Net profit after tax
−$96.2m
n/m ↓ vs $4.8m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
−$98.1m
+21.3% ↑ vs −$124.7m
Operating profit
−$70.4m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Profit before tax
−$94.9m
n/m ↓ vs $6.1m
Cash and cash equivalents
$30.5m
+145.5% ↑ vs $12.4m
Total assets
$1.7b
-9.8% ↓ vs $1.9b
What changed
Net debt / EBITDA reached 28.1x against a four-period mean of 8.9x and prior range of 5.7x–13.6x, with $514.0m of the $589.8m gross borrowings classified as repayable within 12 months. This sits alongside an operating collapse: EBITDA margin of 3.0% is below the prior range of 4.5%–8.7%, also classified as unprecedented.
Revenue fell 15.2% to $652.9m, the weakest reading in the supplied five-period window (range -15.2% to +40.4%). PBT swung from $6.1m to -$94.9m (n/m) and NPAT from $4.8m to -$96.2m (n/m), of which a disclosed -$26.2m relates to discontinued operations; continuing-operations NPAT was -$70.0m. Total equity contracted 14.2% to $698.9m.
What matters
With $514.0m current and total gross borrowings up 11.4% to $589.8m, the company is operating under a balance-sheet review and an explicit deleveraging plan, including a stated intent to consider divestments. Lenders remain supportive per disclosure, but the gap between current EBITDA run-rate and current debt service load is what makes leverage at 28.1x economically meaningful rather than just a denominator effect.
Operating economics, not one-offs, are the bigger problem. Even excluding the -$26.2m discontinued-operations loss, continuing-operations NPAT was still -$70.0m. The Ingredients segment — 36.9% of revenue — generated only $1.4m of result on $293.0m of sales (a derived 0.5% margin), so segment mix is doing little to support consolidated profitability while Advanced Nutrition (14.3% derived margin) and Consumer (10.0%) absorb fixed costs.
Tax distortion widens the headline gap but does not change the read. The PBT-to-NPAT growth gap of 444.1pp reflects an effective tax rate of 26.3% (above the historical range of -35.9% to 24.7%) plus the discontinued-operations loss; PBT growth of n/m is the cleaner operating measure and is itself classified as unprecedented low.
Expectations
The historical shape data shows HY23 was 58.3% of FY23 revenue and HY23 NPAT was -112.1% of FY23 NPAT, so a like-for-like seasonality read for the current half is unreliable. Annualised current revenue of $1.3b would sit roughly in line with FY23's $1.3b of continuing-operations revenue, but that assumes no further demand attrition.
What the release does support is direction, not magnitude: a strategy refresh, a refreshed executive team, narrowed balance-sheet options, and a multi-month strategic review whose outcome is explicitly uncertain. The gap matters because the timing of any divestment or recapitalisation is the binding variable on the 12-month debt classification.
Quality of result
OCF / EBITDA of -493.1% sits at the lower edge of the supplied four-period range. Inventories fell 32.4% to $316.3m, releasing roughly $151.5m of operating working capital — that release is what narrowed the cash outflow. Inventory days at 88.2 are within the historical range of 68.9–123.7 days, so the working-capital position has normalised rather than gone abnormally tight, which limits any further inventory-driven cash benefit in the second half. Pre-lease free cash flow of -$114.8m is within the supplied historical range (-$195.0m to +$71.2m).
Capex was cut 39.2% to $16.7m (2.6% of revenue versus 3.6% prior). FCF / NPAT of 119.3% is mathematically a function of two negatives and should not be read as cash strength. On balance, the cash improvement is balance-sheet-assisted rather than operational, which matters because it cannot be repeated at the same scale next half.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess covenant headroom, the probability of a successful divestment, or any post-balance-date refinancing developments, because those are not contained in the supplied disclosures.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Synlait Milk's HY24 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
NZX Results Template
HY24 / results announcementSynlait Half Year 2024 Announcement
HY24 / results releaseSynlait Half Year 2024 Financial Statements
HY24 / financial reportSynlait Half Year 2024 Investor Presentation
HY24 / results presentationNZX Results Template
HY23 / results announcementSynlait H1 23 Announcement
HY23 / results releaseSynlait H1 23 Financial Statements
HY23 / financial reportNZX Results Template
FY23 / results announcementSynlait Full Year 2023 Annual Report
FY23 / financial reportSynlait Full Year 2023 Media Release
FY23 / media releaseMarket Update
HY24 / commentarySynlait Annual Meeting 2023 Poll Results
HY24 / commentarySynlait HY24 results date and conference call details
HY24 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is 28.11x for this result.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was -15.2% for this reporting period.
Working-capital pressure
Inventory days were 88 days, -22 days versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Synlait Milk briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.