Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Savor (SVR) / HY21

Result released27 November 2020·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

Revenue down 45%; $8m working-capital release flatters cash

An issuer transition and prior-period acquisition leave the HY20 comparison non-comparable, while the working-capital release reflects contraction

Consumer / Hospitality

SVR metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 20 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$11.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

8.86x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.02

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

2.23x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

2.49x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

0.62x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
27 November 2020
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY21 vs HY20

Revenue

$9.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$0.69m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

−$0.4m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$0.14m

— vs —

Interim dividend per share

16.0c

-48.4% ↓ vs 31.0c

Cash and cash equivalents

$3.7m

+840.1% ↑ vs $0.39m

Total assets

$42.1m

-8.9% ↓ vs $46.3m

Analysis ofSVR HY21·Result released27 November 2020·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Revenue from continuing operations fell 45.0% to NZ$9.9m, but the comparison is structurally distorted: HY20 captured the Hospitality business acquisition that lifted the prior-period revenue base to NZ$18.0m, and HY21 trading was constrained by COVID-19 restrictions on hospitality footfall

Group EBITDA roughly doubled to NZ$0.7m from NZ$0.3m and the NPAT loss narrowed 74.1% to NZ$0.4m from NZ$1.6m.

The cash-flow story is dominated by a NZ$8.0m operating working-capital release. Annolyse's historical baseline shows a mean working-capital movement of NZ$-0.3m across the supplied range, so the release sits well outside the company's normal pattern. Trade debtors collapsed from NZ$4.1m to NZ$0.2m and inventory fell from NZ$4.0m to NZ$1.5m — consistent with the business shrinking rather than collecting faster or destocking by design.

Total equity strengthened to NZ$18.6m, cash rose to NZ$3.7m from NZ$0.4m, and the interim dividend was cut 48.4% to 16c per share.

What matters

The HY20 base is not like-for-like

Both reporting period definitions sit inside corporate events: HY20 included the Hospitality acquisition partway through, and HY21 reflects the issuer transition from Moa to Savor alongside COVID disruption. The headline -45.0% revenue movement therefore overstates underlying decline and the -3 percentage-point shift in NPAT margin (now -4.0%, within the historical -10.1% to -1.4% range) is the cleaner read on the operating result.

The working-capital release is contraction, not efficiency. Inventory days reached 28.1 versus a historical mean of 6.4 days — flagged above the company's normal range — but the days ratio is inflated by the revenue collapse rather than a balance-sheet build. Trade debtors falling 94.7% is the dominant driver, which means most of the NZ$8.0m release is mechanically reversible as trading normalises.

Operating cash conversion was negative despite the release. Net operating cash flow was NZ$-0.1m and OCF/EBITDA of -20.8% sits below the supplied historical 53.5%–117.3% range. Pre-lease FCF of NZ$-0.6m landed at the lower edge of the historical range, and the 48.4% dividend cut to 16c per share is consistent with management protecting cash rather than a signal of earnings quality.

Expectations

No forward targets are disclosed

The supplied second-half shape from FY20 shows HY20 contributed 47.1% of FY20 revenue but -17.0% of FY20 EBITDA, implying an H2 EBITDA loss of NZ$2.3m last year as summer trading deepened the result. Management commentary that "trading has continued to improve heading into the Christmas period, with sales above expectations" supports near-term recovery, but the prior H2 EBITDA swing is a useful benchmark for how much hospitality-driven volatility the second half can absorb. The release does not support a quantified FY21 expectation.

Quality of result

The NPAT loss narrowing is real on the income statement but rests on a much smaller revenue base, and the NZ$0.4m EBITDA improvement is the cleaner gauge of operating progress through COVID

None of that translated into operating cash: OCF/EBITDA of -20.8% sits below the company's supplied historical range, and the NZ$8.0m working-capital release was contraction-driven liquidity rather than earnings-quality validation. Capex of NZ$0.4m (4.2% of revenue) was scaled back from the prior period, helping the cash position but reinforcing that the business is conserving rather than investing.

Capital structure is the more durable element. Equity at NZ$18.6m and cash at NZ$3.7m, against gross borrowings of NZ$8.9m, leave net debt/EBITDA at 7.55x — within the supplied historical 4.40x–9.80x range. Leverage is high in absolute terms but the cash buffer looks adequate to absorb the working-capital reversal that the elevated inventory-days reading implies as trade recovers.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of HY20 revenue sat in continuing operations after the issuer transition to Savor, and how does HY21 compare on a like-for-like footprint?
How much of the NZ$8.0m working-capital release does management expect to reverse in H2 as debtors rebuild with trading?
Why did inventory fall to NZ$1.5m from NZ$4.0m — planned destocking, write-downs, or supply constraints?
What drove the equity strengthening to NZ$18.6m, and was new capital issued during the period?
Is the 16c interim the new run-rate dividend, or will it be restored toward HY20 levels once trading normalises?

This briefing cannot assess the underlying like-for-like operating trajectory because the prior-period Hospitality acquisition, current-period COVID disruption, and Moa-to-Savor issuer transition all sit inside the comparison window.

Chat

Ask about SVR HY21

Ask follow-up questions about Savor's HY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SVR HY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Savor's HY21 result.

What share of HY20 revenue sat in continuing operations after the issuer transition to Savor, and how does HY21 compare on a like-for-like footprint?Why does "The HY20 base is not like-for-like" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY21?What should I watch next for SVR after HY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim financial statements

HY21 / financial report↗

Interim results announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

Interim results market announcement

HY21 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Moa Group Limited: FY20 Interim Financial Statements

HY20 / financial report↗

Moa Group Limited: Media release

HY20 / media release↗

Moa Group Limited: Results Announcement

HY20 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Moa Group: Annual Report 2020

FY20 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 7.55x for this result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -45.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -2.6% for this result.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 28 days, -12 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SVR publishes next

Get the next Savor briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.