Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Tower (TWR) / HY23

Weather drove $5.1m reported loss; ex-events underlying NPAT rose 30%

Catastrophic claims and reserve strengthening obscured a stronger underlying book and prompted Tower to skip the interim dividend.

Financials / Insurance

TWR revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $291.2m, versus $594.3m in FY25.

TWR EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was -1.6%, versus 5.4% in FY22.

TWR operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $33m, versus $143.8m in FY25.

TWR working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $0m, versus $0m in FY25.
Release date
25 May 2023
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$501.4m

+134.2% ↑ vs $214.1m

Net profit after tax

−$5.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$18.2m

-27.5% ↓ vs $25.1m

Declared dividend per share

—

— vs 2.5c

Profit before tax

−$8.3m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$1.1b

+39.4% ↑ vs $762.5m

What changed

Tower's reported loss of $5.1m (HY22: profit of $2.9m) was driven by catastrophic weather event costs, masking a stronger underlying book where management's ex-large-events underlying NPAT measure improved to $23.6m from $18.2m, a 30% uplift

Underlying loss including large events was $3.3m versus a $5.4m profit in HY22, and the reported result also reflects strengthening of residual prior-period claims reserves.

The balance sheet expanded materially. Total assets reached $1.1b versus $762.5m, an unprecedented level against Annolyse's historical baseline mean of $675.8m, with total liabilities up 68.4% to $767.0m and equity down 3.7% to $295.6m. Operating cash inflow was $18.2m versus $25.1m. Tower did not declare an interim dividend (HY22 paid 2.5c per share). The Papua New Guinea subsidiary sale and Suva building disposal were classified as discontinued operations, contributing $2.3m after tax.

What matters

Large events drove the reported result, not core deterioration

Underlying NPAT excluding large events rose from $18.2m to $23.6m, supported by premium-rate increases, underwriting changes and expense control. The $5.1m reported loss reflects catastrophic claims and reserve strengthening rather than premium-rate or expense issues, which means this is a claims-volatility story rather than a structural margin story.

The skipped interim dividend changes the capital-return signal. HY22 paid a 2.5c interim, and total FY22 dividends were 6.5c. The release uses "prudent" language without specifying when interim distributions resume, so the shareholder cash-return profile is materially less visible than at HY22.

Balance-sheet expansion outpaces business growth on any reasonable basis. Liabilities rose 68.4% while equity slipped 3.7%, suggesting outstanding claims liabilities and offsetting reinsurance recoveries have both inflated. For an insurer this raises questions about solvency margin and reinsurance counterparty exposure that the supplied excerpts do not directly answer.

Expectations

No formal HY23 target was supplied

Management has flagged the Auckland storm of 9 May as expected to be a large event of $4m to $6m, which will land in H2. Annolyse's historical baseline shows HY normally represents 48.5% of full-year revenue and only 15.6% of full-year NPAT, so the business is structurally second-half-weighted; on that pattern an H2 carrying further catastrophe costs becomes unusually sensitive to weather frequency. The supplied materials do not provide an updated FY23 underlying NPAT range, so the gap between the strengthened ex-events run-rate and any full-year landing point is not directly bridgeable from this release.

Quality of result

The underlying improvement looks operationally driven

The $5.4m uplift in ex-large-events underlying NPAT is consistent with the commentary on rate increases and expense control, and revenue grew across the New Zealand segment ($217.5m vs $189.6m), which supports a real core-book improvement rather than a presentation effect.

Two items reduce confidence in the reported number. Reserve strengthening on residual prior-period claims is a balance-sheet judgement that has weakened P&L without a clear forward-looking driver in the supplied text, so it could recur. The effective tax rate of 10.3% is unprecedented low versus a historical baseline mean of 35.3%, and on a near-break-even pre-tax position that distortion swings the optics; PBT (a loss of $8.3m vs $5.6m profit) is the cleaner read on operating performance. Headline revenue is shown rising materially, but Annolyse's historical baseline flags this as a basis discontinuity rather than a comparable trend, which means top-line growth should not be treated as a like-for-like signal. Cash conversion fell but is less decision-relevant for an insurer than claims and solvency.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the HY23 BAU claims ratio and combined operating ratio, and how do they compare to HY22's 94.8%?
How much of the reported loss is reserve strengthening on prior-period residual claims versus current-period catastrophe claims?
Why does the effective tax rate sit at 10.3% versus the historical 35.3% mean, and is the differential durable?
When does the board expect to resume interim dividends, and what is the threshold under the "prudent" policy?
What is the current solvency margin after the balance-sheet expansion, and how does it compare to regulatory minimums?

This briefing cannot assess Tower's regulatory solvency position, reinsurance recoverability, or detailed claims-cohort development from the supplied materials.

Chat

Ask about TWR HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Tower's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TWR HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Tower's HY23 result.

What is the HY23 BAU claims ratio and combined operating ratio, and how do they compare to HY22's 94.8%?Why does "Large events drove the reported result, not core deterioration" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for TWR after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Tower HY23 Financial Statements (including auditor's report)

HY23 / financial report↗

Tower HY23 Media Release

HY23 / media release↗

Tower HY23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

Tower HY23 Results Announcement Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Tower HY22 Investor Presentation

HY22 / results presentation↗

Tower HY22 Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

Tower HY22 Results Release

HY22 / results release↗

Tower HY22 Signed Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

Full-year context

Tower FY22 Financial Statements (including auditor's report)

FY22 / financial report↗

Tower FY22 Investor Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Tower FY22 Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

Tower FY22 Results Announcement Script

FY22 / results release↗

Release context

Tower Limited - Annual Meeting Address

HY22 / commentary↗

Annual Meeting Address

HY23 / commentary↗

Tower Updates Guidance, Provides Update on Large Events

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 134.2% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TWR publishes next

Get the next Tower briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.