Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
The Warehouse Group (WHS) / FY24

Result released26 September 2024·Annolyse analysis published23 April 2026

Continuing PBT halved as all three retail segments compressed

A $60.3m Torpedo7 exit pushed group NPAT to a $54.2m loss, while capex cut to a third propped up free cash flow.

Consumer / Retail general

WHS metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 22 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$211.6m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

17.93x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.03

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

4.96x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

1.8x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

0.66x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
26 September 2024
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$3b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

−$54.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$185.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

5.0c

-37.5% ↓ vs 8.0c

Operating profit

$58.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$20.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$32.2m

+13.7% ↑ vs $28.3m

Total assets

$1.7b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofWHS FY24·Result released26 September 2024·Annolyse analysis published23 April 2026

What changed

Continuing-operations profit before tax fell 52.8% to $20.6m on revenue down 10.6% to $3,037.6m, and a disclosed $60.3m after-tax loss on the Torpedo7 discontinued operation pushed reported NPAT to a $54.2m loss from a $29.8m profit a year earlier

The earnings compression was broad: The Warehouse segment result dropped to $17.7m (from $71.6m), Warehouse Stationery to $12.9m (from $23.0m) and Noel Leeming to $17.3m (from $27.3m), even though group gross margin held flat at 33.6%.

The board declared no final dividend, leaving the FY24 distribution at the 5.0c interim (already 37.5% below the prior interim of 8.0c). Net debt edged up to $50.7m, gross borrowings rose 8.5% to $82.9m, and equity fell 22.9% to $310.7m, lifting ROE to a negative 15.2% from a positive 8.3%.

What matters

Underlying operating performance is the real story, not the discontinued operation

  • Stripping out Torpedo7, segment earnings still fell sharply across The Warehouse (-75%), Warehouse Stationery (-44%) and Noel Leeming (-37%). With group gross margin flat, the squeeze is operating deleverage on a 10.6% sales decline, which means recovery hinges on top-line stabilisation rather than margin self-help.
  • Cash flow is being supported by a sharp capex cut. Operating cash flow fell 13.2% to $185.9m, but capex was slashed 65.9% to $39.3m (1.3% of revenue versus 3.4% prior), so FCF pre-lease actually rose to $146.6m. That comfortably covered the reduced dividend (11.8% payout) but the underlying cash quality is weaker than the FCF figure suggests.
  • The tax line magnifies the headline. Continuing-operations NPAT was just $6.5m because the effective tax rate jumped to 68.2% from 31.3%. PBT growth (-52.8%) is the cleaner read on operating performance; the $84.0m swing in reported NPAT is mostly the Torpedo7 exit and elevated tax.

Expectations

No forward targets were supplied with this release, so the result is judged against the half-year shape

H1 contributed 53.8% of full-year revenue and 43.7% of the full-year NPAT loss, implying an H2 revenue run-rate of $1.4b and an H2 loss of around $30.5m. Management commentary that H2 sales fell 7.6% versus H1's 4.9% decline points to a worsening sales trajectory into year-end, which matters because segment earnings are now highly geared to any further volume fall.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is poor on multiple measures

Operating cash flow fell 13.2% even as inventories were drawn down $21.2m, and the rise in FCF pre-lease to $146.6m is almost entirely an under-investment story rather than an operating improvement. Capex at 1.3% of revenue is well below the prior-year 3.4% and is unlikely to be sustainable across a multi-store, multi-format retail footprint without affecting future productivity.

The working-capital picture is mixed: inventories fell 4.3% in dollar terms, but inventory days rose to 56.8 from 53.0 because revenue fell faster than stock, and trade debtor days lifted to 4.2 from 3.4. The dividend reset (no final, lower interim) and the 22.9% drop in equity confirm the board is treating this as a year that requires retained capital, not a timing blip.

Unresolved

Open questions

What concrete actions are planned to rebuild The Warehouse segment result from $17.7m, given the -75% fall is not explained by the disposed operations?
Why was capex cut by 65.9%, and at what level does the board view capex as adequate to maintain the store network and digital platforms?
When does the board expect to resume a final dividend, and what coverage threshold needs to be met?
Why did the effective tax rate rise to 68.2%, and is that a one-year distortion or a recurring drag on continuing-ops NPAT?
How is H2's 7.6% sales decline tracking into early FY25, and what assumptions underpin internal forecasts?

This briefing cannot assess management's internal turnaround plan, the underlying drivers of the Torpedo7 exit loss, or the trajectory of trading post-balance-date.

Chat

Ask about WHS FY24

Ask follow-up questions about The Warehouse Group's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about WHS FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about The Warehouse Group's FY24 result.

What concrete actions are planned to rebuild The Warehouse segment result from $17.7m, given the -75% fall is not explained by the disposed operations?Why does "Underlying operating performance is the real story, not the discontinued operation" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for WHS after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

1. WHS FY24 Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

2. WHS FY24 Investor Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

3. WHS FY24 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

4. WHS FY24 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

1. WHS FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

3. WHS FY23 Media Release

FY23 / media release↗

4. WHS FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

Interim context

WHS HY 24 Interim Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

WHS HY24 Interim Results Media Release

HY24 / media release↗

WHS HY24 Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Release context

The Warehouse Group – FY24 EBIT guidance

FY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 228.9pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -15.2%, -23.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -10.6% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 57 days, +4 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when WHS publishes next

Get the next The Warehouse Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.