Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
The Warehouse Group (WHS) / FY25

Operating profit halved to $19.5m as gross margin slid 110bps

Reported NPAT swung positive on a smaller discontinued-ops loss, but underlying retail earnings deteriorated as inventories swelled $61.2m.

Consumer / Retail general

WHS revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $1.6b, versus $3b in FY24.

WHS Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 2.4%, versus 1.9% in FY24.

WHS operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $122.9m, versus $185.9m in FY24.

WHS working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $65.3m, versus -$17.5m in FY24.
Release date
21 March 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$1.6b

-47.1% ↓ vs $3b

Net profit after tax

$11.8m

+121.8% ↑ vs −$54.2m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$122.9m

-33.9% ↓ vs $185.9m

Declared dividend per share

—

— vs 5.0c

Operating profit

$38.9m

-42.7% ↓ vs $67.8m

Profit before tax

$16.9m

-18.0% ↓ vs $20.6m

Cash and cash equivalents

$44.3m

+37.6% ↑ vs $32.2m

Total assets

$1.7b

+2.9% ↑ vs $1.7b

What changed

The HY25 result shows underlying operating profit of $19.5m versus $43.0m in HY24 on the company's own disclosure, despite sales holding broadly flat at $1.607b (down 1.6% on HY24)

Gross margin compressed 110 basis points to 32.5%, more than offsetting a 2.8% reduction in cost of doing business. Reported NPAT of $11.8m flipped positive from a $23.7m HY24 loss, but the swing reflects a smaller discontinued-operations loss ($55.5m versus $60.3m for the Torpedo7-related operations) rather than continuing-operations strength.

Inventories rose $61.2m (13.0%) to $533.3m against the FY24 year-end balance, lengthening inventory days materially. Gross borrowings fell $134.0m to $25.4m and the group ended the half in a small net cash position of $19.0m, versus net debt of $127.1m at FY24 year-end.

What matters

Gross margin compression is doing the damage

The 110bp margin contraction takes roughly $18m off gross profit at HY25 sales levels — almost the entire gap to HY24 operating profit. Cost-of-doing-business reductions have not been deep enough to absorb the margin shift, leaving continuing-operations profitability exposed unless promotional intensity eases.

Inventory has run ahead of trading. Stock is up 13.0% versus the FY24 balance with sales down 1.6%, and the implied inventory-days build is significant. This matters because it raises the probability of further markdown activity into the peak trading period, which would prolong gross-margin pressure rather than relieve it.

The discontinued operation is still bleeding. A $55.5m post-tax loss from Torpedo7-related activities in a single half is large relative to continuing-operations profit of $12.0m, and means reported NPAT is not yet a clean read on the retained business. Until the discontinued-operations tail is closed out, headline earnings will continue to under-represent the retail platform.

Expectations

No forward targets, guidance, or seasonality framework are provided in this release

The Warehouse, Warehouse Stationery and Noel Leeming are structurally second-half-weighted around Christmas, so a broadly flat first-half sales line and an inventory build are not by themselves directional for the full year. What this release does support is that gross-margin defence and inventory clearance — not top-line growth — are the operating issues management has to evidence progress on at FY25. The absence of an interim dividend (5.0 cents was declared at HY24) signals capital is being preserved while those issues play out.

Quality of result

The headline NPAT improvement is largely a presentation effect

Continuing-operations PBT of $16.9m generated $12.0m of continuing-operations profit at a more normal 29.0% effective tax rate (versus 68.2% in the prior reference period), and the swing to a positive reported NPAT is driven almost entirely by the smaller Torpedo7 discontinued-operations loss. The retail business itself is less profitable than at HY24.

Cash flow looks strong on first read — operating cash flow of $122.9m, capex of just $5.1m and FCF before lease payments of $117.8m supported the $134.0m gross-borrowings reduction. But capex is down 87% on the comparable run-rate (capex/revenue of just 0.3%) and the inventory build has not yet been absorbed by peak trading. The cleaner durable signal is the balance-sheet improvement to a small net cash position; underlying cash conversion needs to be re-tested at the full year before the half's apparent cash strength can be relied on.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did inventory grow 13.0% against the FY24 year-end balance when sales were down 1.6%, and what proportion is at risk of markdown into the second half?
What management actions are in train to recover the 110 basis points of gross margin lost, and is the gap structural or cyclical?
When does the Torpedo7 discontinued-operations earnings and cash drag end, and what residual exit costs remain?
Why was no interim dividend declared after 5.0 cents per share at HY24, and what conditions would re-establish distributions?
How much of the 87% capex reduction is timing versus a sustained lower investment run-rate, and what does that imply for store and digital refresh?

This briefing cannot assess full-year cash conversion or whether gross-margin recovery has begun in the peak trading period on this half-year disclosure alone.

Chat

Ask about WHS FY25

Ask follow-up questions about The Warehouse Group's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about WHS FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about The Warehouse Group's FY25 result.

Why did inventory grow 13.0% against the FY24 year-end balance when sales were down 1.6%, and what proportion is at risk of markdown into the second half?Why does "Gross margin compression is doing the damage" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for WHS after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

WHS HY25 Interim Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

WHS HY25 Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

WHS HY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

WHS HY25 Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

1. WHS FY24 Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

3. WHS FY24 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

4. WHS FY24 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Interim context

WHS HY 24 Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

WHS HY24 Interim Results Media Release

HY25 / media release↗

WHS HY24 Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

The Warehouse Group - FY25 Q1 Trading Update

FY25 / commentary↗

The Warehouse Group provides trading update

FY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 139.7pp.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 121 days, +64 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -47.1% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 3.7%, +21.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when WHS publishes next

Get the next The Warehouse Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.