Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

Compare

Compare covered companies

Select two or three covered companies to compare the latest source-backed filing metrics side by side.

Scott Technology (SCT)Blackwell Global Holdings (RTO)AoFrio (AOF)

Showing 3 companies.

← Swipe to view more
Company comparison table
MetricSCT · HY26RTO · HY26AOF · FY22
Revenue$128.2m$0m$74.3m
Revenue growth %

Get updates for SCT vs RTO vs AOF

Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.

5.3%
—
15.7%
EBITDA$13m—$1.6m
EBITDA margin %10.2%—2.2%Outside range lowOutside range low ebitda margin. 2.2%; 3-period range 3.2% to 6.8%. EBITDA margin: 2.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 4.7%, range 3.2%-6.8%.
PBT$5.9m—-$1.2m
PBT growth %18.0%——
NPAT$4.3m—$3.3m
NPAT growth %0.0%—-38.9%
Operating cash flow$6.1m-$0.07m-$4.4m
OCF / EBITDA %46.9%—-270.6%
FCF pre-lease$4.4m—-$4.8m
DPS4.0c——
Payout ratio vs NPAT %76.9%——
ROE %3.3%—13.7%

Source: latest published result for each selected company.

SCT vs RTO vs AOF comparison

Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.