Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

Compare covered companies

Tower (TWR)Heartland Group Holdings (HGH)General Capital (GEN)

Showing 3 companies.

← Swipe to view more
Company comparison table
MetricTWR · HY26HGH · HY26GEN · HY26
Revenue$291.2m$172.3m$12.9m
Revenue growth %

Get updates for TWR vs HGH vs GEN

Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.

-1.6%
11.1%Outside range highOutside range high revenue growth. 11.1%; 4-period range -2% to 10.2%. Revenue growth: 11.1%, above normal range; 4-period mean 6.8%, range -2.0%-10.2%.
19.0%Outside range lowOutside range low revenue growth. 19%; 3-period range 29.7% to 94.7%. Revenue growth: 19.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 54.3%, range 29.7%-94.7%.
EBITDA—$77.9m—
EBITDA margin %—45.2%—
PBT$32.2m$68.1m$1.5m
PBT growth %-54.1%n/m-31.8%
NPAT$22.9m$48.8m$1m
NPAT growth %-53.9%n/m-37.5%
Operating cash flow$33m$299.5m$2.8m
OCF / EBITDA %—384.7%—
FCF pre-lease$32.3m$297.2m$2.8m
FCF post-lease$32.3m——
DPS5.0c3.5c0.3c
Payout ratio vs NPAT %96.2%67.3%Outside range lowOutside range low payout ratio versus npat. 67.3%; 4-period range 68.1% to 500%. Payout ratio versus NPAT: 67.3%, below normal range; 4-period mean 179.7%, range 68.1%-500.0%.19.2%

Source: latest published result for each selected company.

TWR vs HGH vs GEN comparison

Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.