Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Asset Plus (APL) / HY26

Debt fully repaid and FFO turned positive as NPAT fell 30.4%

Graham Street disposal left Asset Plus with NZ$10.3m cash and zero borrowings, but the smaller portfolio means headline profit is not comparable.

Property / Property investment

APL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $6.6m, versus $3.2m in HY26.

APL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 59.4%, versus -5% in HY24.

APL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $3.1m, versus $1m in HY26.

APL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 APL: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-0.5m; 4-period range $-0.1m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.5m, unprecedented low; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.1m.
  • HY25 APL: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-104.3m; 3-period range $-2.2m to $-0.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-104.3m, below normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • HY26 APL: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $-0.2m; 3-period range $-104.3m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.2m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-35.8m.
Release date
19 November 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$3.2m

-1.2% ↓ vs $3.2m

Net profit after tax

$1.6m

-30.4% ↓ vs $2.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$1m

+188.4% ↑ vs −$1.2m

Interim dividend per share

0.2c

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

$1.9m

n/m ↑ vs $0.06m

Profit before tax

$1.6m

-30.4% ↓ vs $2.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$10.3m

+316.1% ↑ vs $2.5m

Total assets

$118.3m

-38.0% ↓ vs $190.8m

What changed

The dominant change is balance-sheet transformation, not operating performance

Following the November 2024 settlement of 35 Graham Street, all bank debt has been extinguished and the asset base reshaped. Total liabilities fell 98.3% to NZ$0.8m as gross borrowings of NZ$33.0m disappeared, total assets contracted 38% to NZ$118.3m, and cash rose to NZ$10.3m from NZ$2.5m. That puts total assets below Annolyse's historical baseline (mean NZ$201.6m, range NZ$190.8m–NZ$221.8m).

Headline metrics moved off a non-comparable base. Revenue eased 1.2% to NZ$3.2m, NPAT fell 30.4% to NZ$1.6m (PBT also -30.4%), and operating cash flow swung to a NZ$1.0m inflow from a NZ$1.2m outflow. Funds from operations, the more relevant property metric, turned to a NZ$1.6m profit versus a NZ$0.4m deficit. The interim dividend stepped down 99.5% to 0.2 cents per share off a prior period that included a special distribution.

What matters

The 30.4% NPAT decline is largely a comparability artefact

The prior comparable included Graham Street earnings since divested, while the current period reflects the residual portfolio operating without interest cost. FFO improving from a NZ$0.4m deficit to a NZ$1.6m profit is the cleaner read on recurring property economics, and revenue at -1.2% sits at the upper edge of the company's recent range (3-period mean -16.3%).

The portfolio is smaller and the capital base is under-deployed. Total assets are below Annolyse's historical range and roughly NZ$83m below the mean. Equity fell 18.1% to NZ$117.5m, and ROE is just 1.4% versus 1.6% in the prior period. For a property investor with NZ$10.3m of unencumbered cash, the question is how that capital is put to work, not whether the income statement grew.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

Expectations

The release does not provide FY26 guidance, and the prior-year shape is a poor anchor: HY25 carried 47.5% of FY25 revenue but FY25 NPAT was a NZ$5.7m loss, implying a NZ$8.0m second-half loss likely driven by valuation effects rather than operating performance

That asymmetry makes any like-for-like 2H projection unreliable.

The disclosed forward catalyst is completion of works at Munroe Lane, expected February 2026. That is the leasing trigger required to lift recurring rental income off the smaller asset base, but no leasing-progress detail is supplied. The release supports an underlying-FFO read; it does not support a quantified FY26 earnings expectation.

Quality of result

The recurring property earnings look durable rather than timing-driven

Pre-lease free cash flow of NZ$0.8m is above Annolyse's historical baseline (3-period mean -NZ$15.8m), reflecting the post-disposal cost base with no interest charge. Operating cash flow converts to 52.2% of NPAT, and FFO turning positive shows the rental engine — separated from disposal gains and finance costs — now generates cash.

The offsetting issues are around capital intensity and deployment. Capex rose 173% to NZ$0.2m (6.4% of revenue) on a smaller portfolio. Receivable days extended to 14.5 from 5.9 — small in absolute terms but worth watching against the reduced revenue base. ROE at 1.4% confirms that NZ$117.5m of equity is currently under-earning while cash sits idle and Munroe Lane is still in works. The result reads as a clean operating period inside a transitional balance sheet, not a steady-state earnings snapshot.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the leasing progress and target tenant economics for Munroe Lane once February 2026 works are complete?
How and over what timeframe does management intend to deploy the NZ$10.3m cash balance?
Will 0.2c per quarter become the steady-state distribution, or is the policy linked to FFO once Munroe Lane stabilises?
Why did capex rise 173% on a smaller portfolio, and what is the maintenance run-rate post-completion?
What rent reversion, occupancy, or weighted-average-lease-term trajectory underpins second-half rental growth assumptions?

This briefing cannot assess the cap-rate, NTA-coverage, or valuation assumptions underlying the property carrying values.

Chat

Ask about APL HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Asset Plus's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about APL HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Asset Plus's HY26 result.

What is the leasing progress and target tenant economics for Munroe Lane once February 2026 works are complete?Why does "The 30.4% NPAT decline is largely a comparability artefact" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for APL after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Asset Plus FY26 Interim Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report↗

Asset Plus FY26 Interim Results Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Asset Plus FY26 NZX Interim company filing

HY26 / results announcement↗

Asset Plus FY26 NZX Interim Results Release

HY26 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Asset Plus FY25 Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Asset Plus FY25 NZX Interim company filing

HY25 / results announcement↗

Asset Plus FY25 NZX Interim Results Release

HY25 / results release↗

Full-year context

Asset Plus FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

company filing

FY25 / results announcement↗

company filing

FY25 / results release↗

Release context

2025 AGM Presentation

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 45.5%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -1.2% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 1.4%, -0.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when APL publishes next

Get the next Asset Plus briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.