Revenue
$58.4m
-3.3% ↓ vs $60.4m
Operating profit and pre-lease FCF both improved, but fair-value losses dragged statutory equity down 11.5% to $1,287.8m.
Revenue context before the current result.
Operating profit margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY24 vs FY23
Revenue
$58.4m
-3.3% ↓ vs $60.4m
Net profit after tax
−$19.8m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$35.9m
-4.5% ↓ vs $37.6m
Final dividend per share
1.7c
flat vs 1.7c
Profit before tax
−$16.8m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Cash and cash equivalents
$2m
+29.2% ↑ vs $1.6m
Total assets
$2.2b
-5.7% ↓ vs $2.3b
What changed
PBT mirrored that at -$16.8m versus $17.1m prior (-197.8%, below the historical range). The driver is non-cash: operating profit before financial items and other gains/losses actually grew 6.4% to $52.9m, and revenue held at $58.4m (-3.3%, the lower edge of Annolyse's historical range), including a $3m receipt from non-settlement of the Albany Lifestyle disposal flagged in the release.
Operating cash flow fell only 4.5% to $35.9m. Capex stepped down to $19.3m from $30.0m, lifting pre-lease FCF to $16.6m – the upper edge of the 5-period range against a mean of $6.0m. Gross borrowings rose to $772.9m, total equity fell 11.5% to $1.3b, and gearing sits at 36.3%, mid the stated 30–40% target band.
What matters
Operating profit grew 6.4% to $52.9m and revenue held within $2m of prior, yet PBT turned to -$16.8m and NPAT to -$19.8m. The implication is that fair-value losses on investment properties (the "other gains/losses" line) are the swing factor, which means rental earnings are intact even though headline profitability has unprecedented_low classifications.
Pre-lease FCF strengthened, not weakened. FCF pre-lease of $16.6m is at the upper edge of the historical range versus the $6.0m mean, driven by a $10.8m capex reduction (capex/revenue at 32.9%, down from 49.7%). The dividend payout against pre-lease FCF of 84.1% sits within Annolyse's historical norm – a sharp improvement from the prior NPAT payout of 131.9%. Cash dividend cover is therefore healthier than the statutory loss implies.
Equity compressed; leverage drifted higher. Total equity fell $167.2m to $1.3b as revaluation losses flowed through, and gross borrowings rose $39.9m. Gearing at 36.3% remains mid-band, but further valuation pressure would push it toward the 40% upper bound and constrain headroom for the medium-term development pipeline the release references.
Expectations
No segment-level guidance for occupancy, WALT, or rent reversion direction is supplied in the excerpts.
Against the sector frame – which anchors on rental income, NTA, gearing, and cap-rate assumptions rather than statutory profit – the release supports continued dividend delivery on cash earnings but provides no quantified outlook for valuation stabilisation. NTA per share of $1.52 anchors the balance-sheet read, but the supplied disclosures do not include a like-for-like portfolio valuation movement or weighted average cap rate. The gap that matters: this release does not let an investor calibrate how much further revaluation pressure remains in the second half.
Quality of result
Pre-lease FCF of $16.6m is well above the historical $6.0m mean and is supported primarily by reduced capex rather than working-capital release. Debtor days fell to 5.3 from 18.0 (below normal range), trimming receivables by $2.1m, but this is small in absolute terms and partly reflects the $3m one-off Albany receipt cycling through. The cash conversion did deteriorate modestly (OCF -4.5%), but conversion-to-NPAT ratios are not meaningful when NPAT is negative for accounting reasons.
The statutory loss is non-cash and reflects investment property fair-value movements, which means ROE of -1.5% (versus 0.7% prior, below the historical range) is accounting-driven rather than a return-on-rental signal. The economic read is that distributable cash earnings and dividend cover are durable; however, reported equity is now moving with the cap-rate cycle, and a further leg of valuation pressure would tighten gearing toward the top of the 30–40% band.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess underlying like-for-like rental growth, cap-rate assumptions, or portfolio occupancy because the supplied excerpts do not disclose those metrics.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Argosy Property's FY24 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
FY24 interim financial statements
FY24 / financial reportFY24 interim market release
FY24 / results releaseFY24 Interim Results Announcement (Appendix 1)
FY24 / results announcementFY24 interim results presentation
FY24 / results presentationFY23 interim financial statements
FY23 / financial reportFY23 interim market release
FY23 / results releaseFY23 interim financial statements
HY24 / financial reportFY23 interim market release
HY24 / results releaseMarket update
FY24 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 116.2%, with NPAT payout at n/a.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was -3.3% for this reporting period.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was -1.5%, -2.2pp versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Argosy Property briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.