Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Argosy Property (ARG) / FY24

Property revaluations push NPAT to -$19.8m while operating profit grew 6.4%

Operating profit and pre-lease FCF both improved, but fair-value losses dragged statutory equity down 11.5% to $1,287.8m.

Property / Property investment

ARG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $120.8m, versus $58.4m in FY25.

ARG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 90.5%, versus 71.2% in FY23.

ARG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $67.4m, versus $32.1m in FY25.

ARG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 ARG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $1.8m; 5-period range $-2.1m to $1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.8m, above normal range; 2/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.0m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-1.2m.
  • FY24 ARG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-2.1m; 5-period range $-0.3m to $1.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.1m, unprecedented low; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.1m, unprecedented low; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Release date
29 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$58.4m

-3.3% ↓ vs $60.4m

Net profit after tax

−$19.8m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$35.9m

-4.5% ↓ vs $37.6m

Final dividend per share

1.7c

flat vs 1.7c

Profit before tax

−$16.8m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$2m

+29.2% ↑ vs $1.6m

Total assets

$2.2b

-5.7% ↓ vs $2.3b

What changed

Statutory NPAT swung to a $19.8m loss from a $10.7m profit (-285.1%), an unprecedented low against the supplied historical mean of 71.6%

PBT mirrored that at -$16.8m versus $17.1m prior (-197.8%, below the historical range). The driver is non-cash: operating profit before financial items and other gains/losses actually grew 6.4% to $52.9m, and revenue held at $58.4m (-3.3%, the lower edge of Annolyse's historical range), including a $3m receipt from non-settlement of the Albany Lifestyle disposal flagged in the release.

Operating cash flow fell only 4.5% to $35.9m. Capex stepped down to $19.3m from $30.0m, lifting pre-lease FCF to $16.6m – the upper edge of the 5-period range against a mean of $6.0m. Gross borrowings rose to $772.9m, total equity fell 11.5% to $1.3b, and gearing sits at 36.3%, mid the stated 30–40% target band.

What matters

Property revaluations are doing all the damage

  1. Operating profit grew 6.4% to $52.9m and revenue held within $2m of prior, yet PBT turned to -$16.8m and NPAT to -$19.8m. The implication is that fair-value losses on investment properties (the "other gains/losses" line) are the swing factor, which means rental earnings are intact even though headline profitability has unprecedented_low classifications.

  2. Pre-lease FCF strengthened, not weakened. FCF pre-lease of $16.6m is at the upper edge of the historical range versus the $6.0m mean, driven by a $10.8m capex reduction (capex/revenue at 32.9%, down from 49.7%). The dividend payout against pre-lease FCF of 84.1% sits within Annolyse's historical norm – a sharp improvement from the prior NPAT payout of 131.9%. Cash dividend cover is therefore healthier than the statutory loss implies.

  3. Equity compressed; leverage drifted higher. Total equity fell $167.2m to $1.3b as revaluation losses flowed through, and gross borrowings rose $39.9m. Gearing at 36.3% remains mid-band, but further valuation pressure would push it toward the 40% upper bound and constrain headroom for the medium-term development pipeline the release references.

Expectations

FY24 dividend guidance of 6.65 cents per share is reaffirmed, and the interim declaration of 1.6625cps is flat versus prior

No segment-level guidance for occupancy, WALT, or rent reversion direction is supplied in the excerpts.

Against the sector frame – which anchors on rental income, NTA, gearing, and cap-rate assumptions rather than statutory profit – the release supports continued dividend delivery on cash earnings but provides no quantified outlook for valuation stabilisation. NTA per share of $1.52 anchors the balance-sheet read, but the supplied disclosures do not include a like-for-like portfolio valuation movement or weighted average cap rate. The gap that matters: this release does not let an investor calibrate how much further revaluation pressure remains in the second half.

Quality of result

The cash side of the result is genuinely more durable than the statutory loss suggests

Pre-lease FCF of $16.6m is well above the historical $6.0m mean and is supported primarily by reduced capex rather than working-capital release. Debtor days fell to 5.3 from 18.0 (below normal range), trimming receivables by $2.1m, but this is small in absolute terms and partly reflects the $3m one-off Albany receipt cycling through. The cash conversion did deteriorate modestly (OCF -4.5%), but conversion-to-NPAT ratios are not meaningful when NPAT is negative for accounting reasons.

The statutory loss is non-cash and reflects investment property fair-value movements, which means ROE of -1.5% (versus 0.7% prior, below the historical range) is accounting-driven rather than a return-on-rental signal. The economic read is that distributable cash earnings and dividend cover are durable; however, reported equity is now moving with the cap-rate cycle, and a further leg of valuation pressure would tighten gearing toward the top of the 30–40% band.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the like-for-like portfolio valuation movement and weighted average cap rate at HY24 compared with the prior period?
How much further valuation downside is the Board stress-testing before gearing approaches the 40% upper bound?
What are current portfolio occupancy and WALT, and how have rent reversions trended across the Industrial, Office, and Large Format Retail segments?
Will the FY24 dividend continue to be covered by recurring cash earnings if revaluation losses persist into the second half?
What is the funded status and timing of the medium-term development pipeline the Board referenced as having sufficient funding capacity?

This briefing cannot assess underlying like-for-like rental growth, cap-rate assumptions, or portfolio occupancy because the supplied excerpts do not disclose those metrics.

Chat

Ask about ARG FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Argosy Property's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about ARG FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Argosy Property's FY24 result.

What is the like-for-like portfolio valuation movement and weighted average cap rate at HY24 compared with the prior period?Why does "Property revaluations are doing all the damage" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for ARG after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY24 interim financial statements

FY24 / financial report↗

FY24 interim market release

FY24 / results release↗

FY24 Interim Results Announcement (Appendix 1)

FY24 / results announcement↗

FY24 interim results presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

FY23 interim financial statements

FY23 / financial report↗

FY23 interim market release

FY23 / results release↗

Interim context

FY23 interim financial statements

HY24 / financial report↗

FY23 interim market release

HY24 / results release↗

Release context

Market update

FY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 116.2%, with NPAT payout at n/a.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -3.3% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -1.5%, -2.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when ARG publishes next

Get the next Argosy Property briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.