Revenue
$120.8m
+3.3% ↑ vs $116.9m
Operating cash flow rose 14.2% but a 22.5% capex lift pushed pre-lease free cash flow to a five-year low.
Revenue context before the current result.
Operating profit margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY26 vs FY25
Revenue
$120.8m
+3.3% ↑ vs $116.9m
Net profit after tax
$127.7m
+1.4% ↑ vs $125.9m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$67.4m
+14.2% ↑ vs $59m
Full-year dividend per share
6.7c
flat vs 6.7c
Cash and cash equivalents
$3.4m
+135.7% ↑ vs $1.4m
Total assets
$2.3b
+8.4% ↑ vs $2.2b
What changed
Pre-lease free cash flow swung to -NZ$2.9m from +NZ$1.5m, an unprecedented low against Annolyse's historical baseline of NZ$7.5m to NZ$19.6m and a five-year average of NZ$12.4m. Operating cash flow itself rose 14.2% to NZ$67.4m, but capital additions on investment properties lifted 22.5% to NZ$70.3m — 58.2% of revenue.
Revenue grew 3.3% to NZ$120.8m, profit before tax rose 1.7% to NZ$140.4m and net profit after tax rose 1.4% to NZ$127.7m. Gross borrowings rose NZ$99.5m to NZ$855.5m, lifting portfolio gearing to 37.2% from 35.7% — still inside the 30-40% target band but at the upper end. Total assets reached NZ$2.3b, NZ$162.0m above the five-year average, and NTA per share rose to NZ$1.60 from NZ$1.53.
What matters
Henderson Place and Lambton Quay sales add balance-sheet context, with NZ$139m disclosed value, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.
Operating cash flow's 14.2% rise was genuine progress, but the simultaneous 22.5% step-up in capex took capital additions to 58.2% of revenue and drove pre-lease free cash flow below zero. This matters because the development programme is currently being funded by debt rather than by cash earnings, and the FCF outcome sits outside the company's recent historical range.
Leverage is rising into a tighter band. Gross borrowings rose 13.2% and gearing moved from the middle of the target band toward its upper edge. The 30-40% target is intact, but headroom to the ceiling has narrowed during a year when development spend accelerated. The trajectory matters more than the level: if FY27 capex stays elevated, the next leg of the band will be tested without disposal support.
Earnings momentum lagged revenue. PBT growth of 1.7% and NPAT growth of 1.4% trailed the 3.3% revenue lift, and ROE drifted to 9.1% from 9.6%. The PBT margin of 116.3% sits within the supplied historical range (mean 107.9%), which confirms revaluation contribution remains within the normal pattern for the portfolio rather than flattering this year's result.
Expectations
The full-year dividend of 6.65cps matched FY25 and was in line with prior guidance.
The release flags a policy shift toward a 80-95% FFO-based payout, but the supplied material does not quantify what that translates to in dividend cents for FY27. No forward-work backlog or FY27 capex guidance is provided in the available context. This matters because the durability of FY26's NZ$70.3m capex run-rate cannot be tested against future operating cash flow, and the read on whether the FCF deficit is a one-year peak or a new baseline is unresolved.
Quality of result
Operating cash flow up 14.2% with debtor days at 9.0 — within Annolyse's historical baseline — points to clean underlying rental collection and cost control. NPAT growth, though modest, is not flattered by tax: the effective tax rate at 9.0% is in line with prior at 8.9%.
The negative-quality read sits below operating cash flow. Pre-lease FCF at -NZ$2.9m is the weakest in the supplied baseline and is structurally driven by development capex, not by working capital or one-offs. The 6.65cps dividend is comfortably covered by NPAT (44.9% payout, similar to FY25's 44.8%) but is not covered by pre-lease free cash flow this year, which means the distribution is being funded by a combination of operating cash flow and balance-sheet capacity rather than by cash earnings after capex. The PBT margin above 100% also reminds that statutory NPAT for a property issuer in a development cycle is not a pure cash-earnings read.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess occupancy, weighted average lease term, rent reversion, or the cap-rate assumptions embedded in the FY26 portfolio revaluation.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Argosy Property's FY26 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
Annual Report and Financial Statements
FY26 / financial reportAppendix 1
FY26 / results announcementMarket Release
FY26 / results releaseResults Presentation
FY26 / results presentationAnnual Report and Financial Statements
FY25 / financial reportAppendix 1
FY25 / results announcementMarket Release
FY25 / results releaseResults Presentation
FY25 / results presentationArgosy FY25 Interim Results Announcement (Appendix 1)
HY26 / results announcementArgosy FY26 Interim Financial Statements
HY26 / financial reportArgosy FY26 Interim Market Release
HY26 / results releaseArgosy FY26 Interim Results Presentation
HY26 / results presentationFY25 full year results announcement and webcast details
FY25 / commentaryFY26 full year results announcement and webcast details
FY26 / commentaryAnnual Meeting Results Announcement
HY26 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Company-disclosed payout ratio is 97.0% on an AFFO basis, with NPAT payout at 44.9%.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.3pp.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 3.3% for this reporting period.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was 9.1%, -0.5pp versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Argosy Property briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.