Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Burger Fuel Group (BFG) / FY26

Result released29 May 2026·Annolyse analysis published29 May 2026

EBITDA margin hit 18.4% — nearly 5 points above BFG's historical mean

A one-off store-sale gain and lower legal costs flattered all earnings lines, so the durability of record-high margins is the key question for FY27.

Consumer / Quick-service restaurants

BFG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $12.2m, versus $12.3m in HY25.

BFG EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY25 BFG HY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 12.6%; 3-period range 14.7% to 17.5%. EBITDA margin: 12.6%, below normal range; 3-period mean 15.8%, range 14.7%-17.5%.
  • HY26 BFG HY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 17.5%; 3-period range 12.6% to 15.3%. EBITDA margin: 17.5%, above normal range; 3-period mean 14.2%, range 12.6%-15.3%.
  • FY24 BFG FY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 13.2%; 3-period range 13.3% to 18.4%. EBITDA margin: 13.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 15.1%, range 13.3%-18.4%.
  • FY26 BFG FY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 18.4%; 3-period range 13.2% to 13.7%. EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.
EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.

BFG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.9m, versus $0.33m in HY25.

BFG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $0.1m, versus $0m in FY25.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 17 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$12.3m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

6.17x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.06

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

0.06x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

1.04x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
29 May 2026
Published
29 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$25.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$4.7m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$3.5m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Operating profit

$2.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$2.7m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$6.1m

+27.0% ↑ vs $4.8m

Total assets

$33.4m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofBFG FY26·Result released29 May 2026·Annolyse analysis published29 May 2026

What changed

BFG's FY26 EBITDA margin reached 18.4%, nearly 5 percentage points above the company's historical average of 13.4% and well outside the prior three-year range of 13.2%–13.7% — a structural-looking uplift that, on closer examination, carries identifiable one-off components

Revenue grew 7.4% to NZ$25.6m, below the historical mean rate of 10.0% but directionally sound after FY25's 8.4% decline. EBITDA rose 41.6% to NZ$4.7m on that 7.4% revenue increase, driving PBT up 80.0% to NZ$2.7m. NPAT doubled (up 100.0% to NZ$2.0m), though that headline partly reflects the effective tax rate falling to 25.9% from 33.2% in FY25 — PBT growth is the cleaner 80.0% read. Management attributed the uplift to three factors: higher sales, the absence of significant legal costs incurred in FY24–FY25, and a one-off NZ$0.3m gain from the sale of the company-owned Ponsonby store. Total system sales across all brands rose 2.9% to NZ$111.4m.

What matters

Margin expansion is real but partially one-off

The EBITDA margin of 18.4% is a genuine step up from prior years, but two of the three disclosed drivers — lapsing legal costs and the store-sale gain — are non-recurring. The underlying margin improvement from sales growth and operating leverage is present, but a 5-percentage-point gap above the historical mean is unlikely to be fully sustained without further system-sales growth or permanent cost reduction.

Tax rate distortion inflates NPAT growth. The 25.9% effective tax rate is 4.5 percentage points below the historical mean of 30.4% and outside the prior three-year range of 28.5%–33.2%. That gap amplified NPAT growth to 100.0% relative to PBT growth of 80.0%. Without knowing whether the lower rate reflects timing items or a permanent change, NPAT is a less reliable run-rate measure than PBT this period.

Cash generation is the strongest outcome. Operating cash flow more than doubled to NZ$3.5m, with pre-lease FCF of NZ$2.9m exceeding the historical range of NZ$0.3m–NZ$2.4m. Cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) of 74.5% is within the company's normal range and a marked improvement on the prior year's 50.0%, which means the improved earnings quality is backed by real cash. Working-capital absorption of NZ$0.1m was a modest drag versus prior-year releases averaging approximately NZ$2.6m, but the absolute amount is small and did not impair cash generation.

Expectations

No stated financial targets are on record for BFG, so there is no formal guidance against which to measure this result

The FY26 outcome represents a clear recovery from FY25's decline: system sales had fallen 7.6% at the half-year and the full year recovered to +2.9%, suggesting H2 system sales improved meaningfully. The second half contributed approximately 53% of operating cash flow, consistent with a business that recovered momentum through the year.

The key uncertainty for FY27 is whether recurring cost savings and volume growth can fill the margin gap left by lapsing legal costs and the Ponsonby gain. System sales growth of 2.9% — while an improvement — is still below the NZ$100m-plus BurgerFuel NZ peak reached in FY24, and international revenue remains marginal at NZ$0.1m.

Quality of result

The improvement in cash generation is the most durable element of FY26

Pre-lease FCF of NZ$2.9m, FCF/NPAT of 149.2%, and cash on hand rising to NZ$6.1m all point to a business generating meaningfully more cash than it reports as earnings, which is a positive quality indicator. ROE strengthened to 16.6% against a historical mean of 8.9%, driven by the earnings uplift and reduced liabilities.

The less durable elements are the margin levels themselves. Legal cost normalisation is a genuine permanent saving if prior-year disputes are resolved, but that requires confirmation. The NZ$0.3m store-sale gain is by definition non-recurring. And the below-historical effective tax rate — 25.9% versus a 28.5%–33.2% prior range — has not been explained, meaning FY27 earnings could face a tax headwind if the rate reverts. Capex doubled year-on-year to NZ$0.6m, though at 2.2% of revenue it remains modest and does not signal a material capital-allocation shift.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the effective tax rate to 25.9% — a specific deferred tax credit, timing item, or permanent rate reduction — and will it normalise in FY27?
Is the absence of significant legal costs a permanent feature, or are any disputes ongoing that could reinstate that cost line?
What is the organic same-store or comparable-store sales trajectory within the 7.4% total revenue growth, separating volume from price and franchise mix?
How does management assess the pace of BurgerFuel system-sales recovery toward the FY24 NZ$100m-plus peak, and what store-count or channel investments are planned?
Whether the international segment's return to marginal profitability (NZ$0.02m versus a NZ$0.06m loss in FY25) reflects a structural stabilisation or simply a lower cost base following Middle East closures.

This briefing cannot assess the sustainability of the legal-cost saving, the tax rate outlook, or the underlying same-store sales trajectory without further management disclosure.

Chat

Ask about BFG FY26

Ask follow-up questions about Burger Fuel Group's FY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BFG FY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Burger Fuel Group's FY26 result.

What drove the effective tax rate to 25.9% — a specific deferred tax credit, timing item, or permanent rate reduction — and will it normalise in FY27?Why does "Margin expansion is real but partially one-off" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY26?What should I watch next for BFG after FY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BFG Preliminary announcement of full year results FY26

FY26 / financial report↗

Results for announcement to the market FY26

FY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Burger Fuel Group Limited FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Interim context

BFG Half Year Results - 30 September 2025

HY26 / financial report↗

BFG Half year Results 30.09.25 NZX Summary

HY26 / results announcement↗

Release context

Chairman and CEO Address

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 20.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 74.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +24.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 7.4% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 16.6%, +6.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BFG publishes next

Get the next Burger Fuel Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.