Revenue
$9.4m
+16.0% ↑ vs $8.1m
Strong system-sales growth failed to translate into cash, with inventory days hitting an unprecedented 13.3 days against a historical mean of 9.7
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY22 vs HY21
Revenue
$9.4m
+16.0% ↑ vs $8.1m
EBITDA
$1.4m
+7.6% ↑ vs $1.3m
Net profit after tax
$0.4m
flat vs $0.4m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
−$0.18m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Total assets
$42.6m
-6.6% ↓ vs $45.6m
What changed
The cash reversal matters because pre-lease free cash flow fell to –NZ$0.3m from +NZ$1.3m in the prior half.
Reported NPAT of NZ$0.4m was up 12.8% in dollar terms versus HY21, but the PBT improvement was only 3.7% on rounded figures — effectively flat at 0.0% on the canonical measure — meaning the NPAT uplift was largely driven by a lower effective tax rate of 23.1%, well below the 29.3% prior comparable and the company's historical range of 26.0%–34.7%.
The PBT margin of 5.3% is below the company's historical range of 5.5%–9.6% (four-period mean: 7.1%), indicating that operating leverage did not follow the revenue acceleration.
What matters
Inventory days reached 13.3 days, an unprecedented high against a four-period mean of 9.7 days and a prior range of 7.7–12.1 days. For a quick-service restaurant franchisor, elevated stock on hand is unusual and, if not explained by deliberate supply-chain pre-positioning, implies either demand softness within the supplied network or a change in procurement timing. Working-capital movement was NZ$–0.9m — above the historical average release of approximately NZ$–1.0m — driven in part by the inventory build and a sharp reduction in contract liabilities (from NZ$1.9m to NZ$1.2m). This is the primary reason OCF turned negative despite profitable operations.
Revenue growth is real but margin did not keep pace. The 16.0% top-line gain reflects increased royalty income and system sales, consistent with the NZX commentary attributing growth to wider network activity. However, the PBT margin of 5.3% sits below the historical floor of 5.5%, suggesting cost growth — likely labour, occupancy, or overhead — absorbed most of the volume benefit. The NPAT margin of 4.2% is at the lower edge of the company's four-period range of 3.6%–7.0%.
Tax rate flatters NPAT. The 23.1% effective rate is 6.7 percentage points below the historical mean of 29.8%. The lower rate partially explains why NPAT grew 12.8% while PBT was essentially flat. Investors relying on the headline NPAT uplift should use PBT as the cleaner operating read for this period.
Expectations
The 16.0% revenue result is above the historical half-year mean and represents the top of the observed range, which sets a high base for the second half of FY22.
The key question is whether the inventory build and contract-liability drawdown are a timing shift that will normalise in H2, or whether they signal softer franchise activity ahead. Without management commentary on pipeline openings or system sales trajectory, the cash-flow position creates uncertainty around whether the second half can recover to positive operating cash flow.
Quality of result
However, the margin compression — with PBT margin below the company's historical floor — indicates that cost growth was meaningful and that the top-line gain did not drop through to earnings at a normal rate.
The cash quality is weaker. OCF was negative and pre-lease FCF was –NZ$0.3m, compared to +NZ$1.3m a year earlier. The FCF-to-NPAT ratio was –76.8%, against +358.5% in HY21. The working-capital absorption was NZ$–0.9m, and the primary driver appears to be the inventory build to an unprecedented 13.3 days, alongside a material reduction in contract liabilities. Until the inventory position is explained, this working-capital movement should be treated as a question about network momentum rather than a favourable timing difference.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess the sustainability of the top-line growth rate without disclosure of system sales by market, store-count movements, or a management outlook on franchise pipeline.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY22 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2021
HY22 / financial reportBFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2021
HY22 / results announcementBFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2020
HY21 / financial reportBFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2020
HY21 / results announcementBFG FY22 Annual Report
FY21 / financial reportRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 16.0% for this reporting period.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was 7.2%, +0.8pp versus the prior comparable period.
Working-capital pressure
Inventory days were 13 days, +2 days versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Burger Fuel Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.