Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Burger Fuel Group (BFG) / HY22

Revenue up 16% but OCF swings to –NZ$0.2m as inventory builds to a record high

Strong system-sales growth failed to translate into cash, with inventory days hitting an unprecedented 13.3 days against a historical mean of 9.7

Consumer / Quick-service restaurants

BFG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $25.6m, versus $12.2m in HY26.

BFG EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY24 BFG: Outside range low ebitda margin. 13.2%; 3-period range 13.3% to 18.4%. EBITDA margin: 13.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 15.1%, range 13.3%-18.4%.
  • HY25 BFG: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 12.6%; 4-period range 14.7% to 17.5%. EBITDA margin: 12.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 15.7%, range 14.7%-17.5%.
  • HY26 BFG: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 17.5%; 4-period range 12.6% to 15.3%. EBITDA margin: 17.5%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 14.5%, range 12.6%-15.3%.
  • FY26 BFG: Outside range high ebitda margin. 18.4%; 3-period range 13.2% to 13.7%. EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.
EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.

BFG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $3.5m, versus $1.9m in HY26.

BFG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY22 BFG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $-0.9m; 4-period range $-2,524.7m to $-394.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.9m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-1029.4m.
  • HY23 BFG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-2,524.7m; 4-period range $-674.3m to $-0.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2524.7m, unprecedented low; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-398.5m.
  • FY24 BFG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2,710.5m; 3-period range $-2,521.7m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2710.5m, below normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2521.7m.
  • FY26 BFG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $0.1m; 3-period range $-2,710.5m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.1m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2616.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.1m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2616.1m.
Release date
26 November 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY22 vs HY21

Revenue

$9.4m

+16.0% ↑ vs $8.1m

EBITDA

$1.4m

+7.6% ↑ vs $1.3m

Net profit after tax

$0.4m

flat vs $0.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$0.18m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$42.6m

-6.6% ↓ vs $45.6m

What changed

Operating cash flow swung from a NZ$1.5m inflow in HY21 to a NZ$0.2m outflow in HY22, even as revenue rose 16.0% to NZ$9.4m — the strongest half-year top-line result in Annolyse's four-period baseline, which averages 6.9% growth across a range of –1.3% to 15.9%

The cash reversal matters because pre-lease free cash flow fell to –NZ$0.3m from +NZ$1.3m in the prior half.

Reported NPAT of NZ$0.4m was up 12.8% in dollar terms versus HY21, but the PBT improvement was only 3.7% on rounded figures — effectively flat at 0.0% on the canonical measure — meaning the NPAT uplift was largely driven by a lower effective tax rate of 23.1%, well below the 29.3% prior comparable and the company's historical range of 26.0%–34.7%.

The PBT margin of 5.3% is below the company's historical range of 5.5%–9.6% (four-period mean: 7.1%), indicating that operating leverage did not follow the revenue acceleration.

What matters

Inventory build at a record level

Inventory days reached 13.3 days, an unprecedented high against a four-period mean of 9.7 days and a prior range of 7.7–12.1 days. For a quick-service restaurant franchisor, elevated stock on hand is unusual and, if not explained by deliberate supply-chain pre-positioning, implies either demand softness within the supplied network or a change in procurement timing. Working-capital movement was NZ$–0.9m — above the historical average release of approximately NZ$–1.0m — driven in part by the inventory build and a sharp reduction in contract liabilities (from NZ$1.9m to NZ$1.2m). This is the primary reason OCF turned negative despite profitable operations.

Revenue growth is real but margin did not keep pace. The 16.0% top-line gain reflects increased royalty income and system sales, consistent with the NZX commentary attributing growth to wider network activity. However, the PBT margin of 5.3% sits below the historical floor of 5.5%, suggesting cost growth — likely labour, occupancy, or overhead — absorbed most of the volume benefit. The NPAT margin of 4.2% is at the lower edge of the company's four-period range of 3.6%–7.0%.

Tax rate flatters NPAT. The 23.1% effective rate is 6.7 percentage points below the historical mean of 29.8%. The lower rate partially explains why NPAT grew 12.8% while PBT was essentially flat. Investors relying on the headline NPAT uplift should use PBT as the cleaner operating read for this period.

Expectations

BurgerFuel has provided no numerical guidance, and no forward-work or contract pipeline data is disclosed for this business

The 16.0% revenue result is above the historical half-year mean and represents the top of the observed range, which sets a high base for the second half of FY22.

The key question is whether the inventory build and contract-liability drawdown are a timing shift that will normalise in H2, or whether they signal softer franchise activity ahead. Without management commentary on pipeline openings or system sales trajectory, the cash-flow position creates uncertainty around whether the second half can recover to positive operating cash flow.

Quality of result

The revenue result looks durable in that it is driven by higher system sales and royalty income rather than one-off items

However, the margin compression — with PBT margin below the company's historical floor — indicates that cost growth was meaningful and that the top-line gain did not drop through to earnings at a normal rate.

The cash quality is weaker. OCF was negative and pre-lease FCF was –NZ$0.3m, compared to +NZ$1.3m a year earlier. The FCF-to-NPAT ratio was –76.8%, against +358.5% in HY21. The working-capital absorption was NZ$–0.9m, and the primary driver appears to be the inventory build to an unprecedented 13.3 days, alongside a material reduction in contract liabilities. Until the inventory position is explained, this working-capital movement should be treated as a question about network momentum rather than a favourable timing difference.

  • OCF swung NZ$1.7m negative year-on-year, fully explained by working-capital absorption rather than capex or financing.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove inventory days to 13.3 days — the highest in the company's recent history — and is this a supply-chain pre-buy or evidence of softer throughput across the franchise network?
Why did PBT margin fall below the company's historical range despite 16.0% revenue growth, and which cost lines (labour, occupancy, or overhead) were the primary drivers?
What caused the effective tax rate to fall to 23.1%, well below the historical range of 26.0%–34.7%, and is this a permanent or timing-driven benefit?
Whether the NZ$0.8m reduction in contract liabilities reflects franchise fee deferrals, fewer new store signings, or accelerated revenue recognition, and what this implies for H2 opening activity?
Will operating cash flow recover in H2 FY22, and does management expect inventory to normalise within the next reporting period?

This briefing cannot assess the sustainability of the top-line growth rate without disclosure of system sales by market, store-count movements, or a management outlook on franchise pipeline.

Chat

Ask about BFG HY22

Ask follow-up questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BFG HY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY22 result.

What drove inventory days to 13.3 days — the highest in the company's recent history — and is this a supply-chain pre-buy or evidence of softer throughput across the franchise network?Why does "Inventory build at a record level" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY22?What should I watch next for BFG after HY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

BFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2021

HY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2020

HY21 / financial report↗

BFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2020

HY21 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

BFG FY22 Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 16.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 7.2%, +0.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 13 days, +2 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BFG publishes next

Get the next Burger Fuel Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.