Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Burger Fuel Group (BFG) / HY22

Result released26 November 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

Revenue up 16% but OCF swings to –NZ$0.2m as inventory builds to a record high

Strong system-sales growth failed to translate into cash, with inventory days hitting an unprecedented 13.3 days against a historical mean of 9.7

Consumer / Quick-service restaurants

BFG metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 17 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$12.3m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

6.17x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.06

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

0.06x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

1.04x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
26 November 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY22 vs HY21

Revenue

$9.4m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$1.4m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$0.4m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$0.18m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Total assets

$42.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofBFG HY22·Result released26 November 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Operating cash flow swung from a NZ$1.5m inflow in HY21 to a NZ$0.2m outflow in HY22, even as revenue rose 16.0% to NZ$9.4m — the strongest half-year top-line result in Annolyse's four-period baseline, which averages 6.9% growth across a range of –1.3% to 15.9%

The cash reversal matters because pre-lease free cash flow fell to –NZ$0.3m from +NZ$1.3m in the prior half.

Reported NPAT of NZ$0.4m was up 12.8% in dollar terms versus HY21, but the PBT improvement was only 3.7% on rounded figures — effectively flat at 0.0% on the canonical measure — meaning the NPAT uplift was largely driven by a lower effective tax rate of 23.1%, well below the 29.3% prior comparable and the company's historical range of 26.0%–34.7%.

The PBT margin of 5.3% is below the company's historical range of 5.5%–9.6% (four-period mean: 7.1%), indicating that operating leverage did not follow the revenue acceleration.

What matters

Inventory build at a record level

Inventory days reached 13.3 days, an unprecedented high against a four-period mean of 9.7 days and a prior range of 7.7–12.1 days. For a quick-service restaurant franchisor, elevated stock on hand is unusual and, if not explained by deliberate supply-chain pre-positioning, implies either demand softness within the supplied network or a change in procurement timing. Working-capital movement was NZ$–0.9m — above the historical average release of approximately NZ$–1.0m — driven in part by the inventory build and a sharp reduction in contract liabilities (from NZ$1.9m to NZ$1.2m). This is the primary reason OCF turned negative despite profitable operations.

Revenue growth is real but margin did not keep pace. The 16.0% top-line gain reflects increased royalty income and system sales, consistent with the NZX commentary attributing growth to wider network activity. However, the PBT margin of 5.3% sits below the historical floor of 5.5%, suggesting cost growth — likely labour, occupancy, or overhead — absorbed most of the volume benefit. The NPAT margin of 4.2% is at the lower edge of the company's four-period range of 3.6%–7.0%.

Tax rate flatters NPAT. The 23.1% effective rate is 6.7 percentage points below the historical mean of 29.8%. The lower rate partially explains why NPAT grew 12.8% while PBT was essentially flat. Investors relying on the headline NPAT uplift should use PBT as the cleaner operating read for this period.

Expectations

BurgerFuel has provided no numerical guidance, and no forward-work or contract pipeline data is disclosed for this business

The 16.0% revenue result is above the historical half-year mean and represents the top of the observed range, which sets a high base for the second half of FY22.

The key question is whether the inventory build and contract-liability drawdown are a timing shift that will normalise in H2, or whether they signal softer franchise activity ahead. Without management commentary on pipeline openings or system sales trajectory, the cash-flow position creates uncertainty around whether the second half can recover to positive operating cash flow.

Quality of result

The revenue result looks durable in that it is driven by higher system sales and royalty income rather than one-off items

However, the margin compression — with PBT margin below the company's historical floor — indicates that cost growth was meaningful and that the top-line gain did not drop through to earnings at a normal rate.

The cash quality is weaker. OCF was negative and pre-lease FCF was –NZ$0.3m, compared to +NZ$1.3m a year earlier. The FCF-to-NPAT ratio was –76.8%, against +358.5% in HY21. The working-capital absorption was NZ$–0.9m, and the primary driver appears to be the inventory build to an unprecedented 13.3 days, alongside a material reduction in contract liabilities. Until the inventory position is explained, this working-capital movement should be treated as a question about network momentum rather than a favourable timing difference.

  • OCF swung NZ$1.7m negative year-on-year, fully explained by working-capital absorption rather than capex or financing.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove inventory days to 13.3 days — the highest in the company's recent history — and is this a supply-chain pre-buy or evidence of softer throughput across the franchise network?
Why did PBT margin fall below the company's historical range despite 16.0% revenue growth, and which cost lines (labour, occupancy, or overhead) were the primary drivers?
What caused the effective tax rate to fall to 23.1%, well below the historical range of 26.0%–34.7%, and is this a permanent or timing-driven benefit?
Whether the NZ$0.8m reduction in contract liabilities reflects franchise fee deferrals, fewer new store signings, or accelerated revenue recognition, and what this implies for H2 opening activity?
Will operating cash flow recover in H2 FY22, and does management expect inventory to normalise within the next reporting period?

This briefing cannot assess the sustainability of the top-line growth rate without disclosure of system sales by market, store-count movements, or a management outlook on franchise pipeline.

Chat

Ask about BFG HY22

Ask follow-up questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BFG HY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY22 result.

What drove inventory days to 13.3 days — the highest in the company's recent history — and is this a supply-chain pre-buy or evidence of softer throughput across the franchise network?Why does "Inventory build at a record level" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY22?What should I watch next for BFG after HY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

BFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2021

HY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2020

HY21 / financial report↗

BFG NZX Announcement - half year ended 30 September 2020

HY21 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

BFG FY22 Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 11.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 16.0% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 7.2%, +0.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 13 days, +2 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BFG publishes next

Get the next Burger Fuel Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.