Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Burger Fuel Group (BFG) / HY24

Working-capital release lifted cash as tax jump trimmed NPAT growth to 5.2%

An unusual $0.7M working-capital release pushed cash conversion to 87.0% while the effective tax rate climbed from 26.0% to 31.0%, holding NPAT

Consumer / Quick-service restaurants

BFG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $25.6m, versus $12.2m in HY26.

BFG EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY24 BFG: Outside range low ebitda margin. 13.2%; 3-period range 13.3% to 18.4%. EBITDA margin: 13.2%, below normal range; 3-period mean 15.1%, range 13.3%-18.4%.
  • HY25 BFG: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 12.6%; 4-period range 14.7% to 17.5%. EBITDA margin: 12.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 15.7%, range 14.7%-17.5%.
  • HY26 BFG: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 17.5%; 4-period range 12.6% to 15.3%. EBITDA margin: 17.5%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 14.5%, range 12.6%-15.3%.
  • FY26 BFG: Outside range high ebitda margin. 18.4%; 3-period range 13.2% to 13.7%. EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.
EBITDA margin: 18.4%, above normal range; 3-period mean 13.4%, range 13.2%-13.7%.

BFG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $3.5m, versus $1.9m in HY26.

BFG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY22 BFG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $-0.9m; 4-period range $-2,524.7m to $-394.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.9m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-1029.4m.
  • HY23 BFG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-2,524.7m; 4-period range $-674.3m to $-0.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2524.7m, unprecedented low; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-398.5m.
  • FY24 BFG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2,710.5m; 3-period range $-2,521.7m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2710.5m, below normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2521.7m.
  • FY26 BFG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $0.1m; 3-period range $-2,710.5m to $0m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.1m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2616.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.1m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2616.1m.
Release date
24 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$12.4b

+15.9% ↑ vs $10.7b

EBITDA

$1.8b

+11.8% ↑ vs $1.6b

Net profit after tax

$581.1m

+5.2% ↑ vs $552.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$1.6b

+27.2% ↑ vs $1.3b

Interim dividend per share

19.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$842.2m

+12.8% ↑ vs $746.6m

Cash and cash equivalents

$8.9b

+21.2% ↑ vs $7.4b

Total assets

$39.4b

-1.8% ↓ vs $40.1b

What changed

Operating cash flow rose 27.2% to $1.6M, well ahead of EBITDA growth of 11.8%, because operating working capital released about $0.7M in the half

Annolyse's historical baseline classifies that movement as below the normal range: the four-period mean is a release of around $0.2M, and the two prior periods that saw releases averaged roughly $0.5M. So cash conversion of 87.0% (versus 76.5% in HY23) sits at the top of the historical range rather than reflecting a new operating run-rate.

Underneath, revenue grew 15.9% to $12.4M and PBT grew 12.8% to $0.84M. NPAT, however, grew only 5.2% to $0.58M because the effective tax rate rose from 26.0% to 31.0%. The group remained debt-free with cash of $8.9M (up from $7.4M) and declared a 19c interim dividend.

What matters

Tax line is doing most of the work between PBT and NPAT

  • PBT growth of 12.8% is the cleaner operating read; the 7.6pp gap to NPAT growth of 5.2% is driven almost entirely by the effective tax rate moving from 26.0% to 31.0%. Operating performance is healthier than the headline net profit suggests, but the higher tax rate will persist mechanically into H2 unless management can explain it as one-off.

  • Cash quality is partly timing-driven. The working-capital release of about $0.7M, debtor days at an unprecedented low of 29.8 (versus a historical range of 30.3–30.9) and inventory days at 7.7 (versus a 10.4 mean) all moved favourably together. That combination flatters both the 87.0% conversion and the 171.2% FCF-to-NPAT ratio. If working capital normalises, H2 cash generation will look materially weaker even on similar EBITDA.

  • New Zealand carries the result and its margin compressed. New Zealand is 99.9% of revenue, but the segment result slipped to $1.06M from $1.10M, with the derived margin moving to 8.1% from 9.7% despite double-digit revenue growth. International is rounding-error revenue ($14k) with a narrower loss. The economic story is NZ, and NZ operating leverage went the wrong way this half.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance figures are supplied in this release, and Annolyse's shape context applies only to FY23: NPAT in FY23 was second-half-weighted (HY23 was 61.3% of FY23 NPAT), while revenue and EBITDA split roughly evenly between halves

That FY23 pattern says little about whether HY24's operating gains carry into H2.

Management commentary points to continued sales momentum and the introduction of online delivery for the BurgerFuel brand, but also flags a challenging environment. The release does not support a quantitative H2 expectation; what it does support is that current run-rate operating margin in New Zealand has compressed, which matters most because NZ is effectively the whole business.

Quality of result

The durable part of this result is revenue: +15.9% on a like-for-like basis is meaningful for a small franchise base

EBITDA growth of 11.8% lags revenue, however, and the NZ segment margin compression suggests cost growth ran ahead of system economics this half.

The less durable part is cash quality. The combination of an unusually favourable working-capital release, debtor days at an unprecedented low and inventory days well below the historical range produced the 87.0% cash conversion and the 171.2% FCF-to-NPAT figure. Capex was $0.6M (4.8% of revenue, up from 4.5%), so reinvestment intensity is broadly stable. The implication is that H2 free cash flow will probably look more pedestrian unless these working-capital positions hold or improve further, and ROE of 4.7% — below Annolyse's historical range of 4.8–9.5% — already signals that the cash-rich balance sheet is not currently translating to strong returns on equity.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the effective tax rate rise from 26.0% to 31.0%, and is this the new run-rate?
What drove the inventory reduction from 12.1 days to 7.7 days, and is it a one-off destock or a structural change?
Why did the New Zealand segment margin compress from 9.7% to 8.1% despite 15.6% segment revenue growth?
Is the 19c interim dividend a new ongoing policy, given no prior interim was paid, and how does it sit against FCF-pre-lease of about $1.0M?
What share of the working-capital release does management expect to retain into H2?

This briefing cannot assess same-store sales, brand-level system sales, or the cash flow implications of the new dividend policy without further disclosure.

Chat

Ask about BFG HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BFG HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Burger Fuel Group's HY24 result.

Why did the effective tax rate rise from 26.0% to 31.0%, and is this the new run-rate?Why does "Tax line is doing most of the work between PBT and NPAT" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for BFG after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2023

HY24 / financial report↗

BFG NZX Results Summary 30 Sept 2023

HY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

BFG Half Year Announcement - 30 Sept 2022

HY23 / financial report↗

Full-year context

BFG Preliminary announcement of full year results FY23

FY23 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 7.6pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 87.0% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +10.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 15.9% for this reporting period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -4.87x, -0.38x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BFG publishes next

Get the next Burger Fuel Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.