Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Briscoe Group (BGP) / FY23

FCF jumped to a record NZ$129.1m while NPAT held flat at +0.6%

Revenue grew 5.6% but a 174 bps gross-margin contraction kept earnings flat, even as inventory release and lower capex lifted cash conversion

Consumer / Retail general

BGP revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $798.8m, versus $371.3m in HY26.

BGP Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was 12%, versus 12.6% in HY26.

BGP operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $102.4m, versus $24.6m in HY26.

BGP working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY22 BGP: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $17.4m; 3-period range $-2.9m to $11.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$17.4m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$11.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
  • FY22 BGP: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $29.6m; 4-period range $-14m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$29.6m, unprecedented high; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-9.2m.
  • HY24 BGP: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.9m; 3-period range $0m to $17.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.9m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY26 BGP: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-14m; 4-period range $-13m to $29.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-14.0m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.9m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-6.7m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-14.0m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.9m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-6.7m.
Release date
15 March 2023
Published
21 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$785.9m

+5.6% ↑ vs $744.5m

Net profit after tax

$88.4m

+0.6% ↑ vs $87.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$144.4m

+49.7% ↑ vs $96.5m

Declared dividend per share

16.0c

+3.2% ↑ vs 15.5c

Cash and cash equivalents

$149.9m

+46.2% ↑ vs $102.5m

Total assets

$717.4m

+4.2% ↑ vs $688.5m

What changed

Pre-lease free cash flow stepped up to NZ$129.1m, an unprecedented high against Annolyse's historical baseline mean of NZ$72.5m (range NZ$51.5m–NZ$108.2m), and well clear of the prior comparable NZ$78.3m

The cash result is the headline event because the underlying earnings barely moved: PBT rose 0.6% to NZ$123.1m and NPAT rose 0.6% to NZ$88.4m on revenue growth of 5.6% to NZ$785.9m. The gap is explained by a gross-margin contraction of 174 bps to 44.02% from 45.76%, which absorbed most of the volume gain.

Operating cash inflow rose 49.7% to NZ$144.4m, capex fell to NZ$15.4m from NZ$18.2m, and the closing cash balance reached NZ$149.9m with zero interest-bearing debt. The total dividend lifted to 28.0cps from 27.0cps, with a 16.0cps final declared.

What matters

Cash generation decoupled from earnings

  • FCF/NPAT of 145.9% and the unprecedented NZ$129.1m pre-lease FCF reflect a 15.4% capex cut and a modest inventory drawdown (inventories down NZ$1.7m), not earnings expansion. For an investor, this means the cash strength flatters a year where operating profit actually slipped 0.7% to NZ$135.5m.

  • Gross margin took 174 bps off the revenue-growth read. Revenue rose 5.6%, but margin contraction left PBT essentially flat. Segment-level result divergence reinforces the pressure point: sporting goods segment result fell to NZ$54.0m from NZ$57.7m on revenue of NZ$298.4m, while homeware grew modestly to NZ$75.7m on NZ$487.5m. The implication is that the volume story is real but pricing/mix is not flowing through to earnings.

  • Balance-sheet flexibility is at a peak, payout discipline is unusually tight. Cash of NZ$149.9m, no debt, ROE of 28.7% (upper edge of the historical 19.4%–29.4% range), and a payout-to-FCF ratio of 27.6% — flagged as an unprecedented low against the historical 34.0%–44.0% range — together signal capacity for capital return or investment that the current dividend track does not absorb.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance are supplied with this release, so the result has to be judged against shape and historical baselines rather than a stated bar

The interim split shows H1 NPAT of NZ$45.6m representing 51.6% of full-year NPAT, which means the implied second-half NPAT of NZ$42.8m was the weaker half — consistent with the gross-margin commentary track from HY23 (45.64% vs 46.50% prior).

Against the historical baseline, PBT margin of 15.7% and NPAT margin of 11.2% both sit at the upper edge of the four-year range, so the headline profitability is strong even though growth was minimal. The gap that matters is the trajectory of gross margin into FY24, which the release does not address.

Quality of result

The earnings line looks durable in level but soft in trajectory: profitability margins are at the top of the historical range, the effective tax rate of 28.1% is below the 28.2%–36.2% historical band but only marginally so, and there is no one-off item in the calculation pass

PBT and NPAT both grew 0.6%, so there is no tax distortion to unwind.

The cash result is meaningfully less durable than its size suggests. Two of the drivers are non-recurring in nature:

  • Capex of NZ$15.4m (2.0% of revenue) is below the prior-year NZ$18.2m and below the trailing capex-to-revenue rate, raising the question of whether investment was deferred rather than reduced.
  • Inventory days fell to 54.7 from 58.6, releasing working capital after the prior year's build; the operating working-capital movement of –NZ$0.5m sits at the upper edge of the historical range (mean –NZ$7.2m), so the inventory tailwind is partial, not a full normalisation.

Strip those two factors and FCF conversion would look closer to the historical 89.1% than the 145.9% reported.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the 174 bps gross-margin contraction, and is it promotional intensity, cost inflation, or sporting goods mix?
Why did capex fall to 2.0% of revenue, and does that reflect deferred store or system investment that will rebuild in FY24?
How does the board intend to deploy a NZ$149.9m cash balance with zero debt when payout-to-FCF has dropped to 27.6%?
Whether the sporting goods segment result decline is a one-year demand effect or a structural margin reset.
What is the expected H1 FY24 inventory and gross-margin trajectory given the elevated 54.7 inventory days at year-end?

This briefing cannot assess management's specific plans for capital deployment or the channel and category mix behind the gross-margin compression, as neither is addressed in the supplied release excerpts.

Chat

Ask about BGP FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Briscoe Group's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BGP FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Briscoe Group's FY23 result.

What is driving the 174 bps gross-margin contraction, and is it promotional intensity, cost inflation, or sporting goods mix?Why does "Cash generation decoupled from earnings" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for BGP after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BGP- Annual Report 29 January 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

BGP FY Jan 2022 Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report

FY22 / financial report↗

BGP FY Jan 2022 Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

BGP FY Jan 2022 Results Commentary

FY22 / results release↗

Interim context

BGP HY July 2022 Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Review Report

HY23 / financial report↗

BGP HY July 2022 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

BGP HY July 2022 Results Commentary

HY23 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 47.4%, with NPAT payout at 40.3%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 5.6% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 28.7%, -0.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BGP publishes next

Get the next Briscoe Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.