Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

Margins compressed to historical floor while dividend exceeds free cash flow

PBT margin at 11.0% sits at the bottom of the four-year range and the interim dividend consumes 227.8% of $9.8m pre-lease free cash flow.

BGP revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

Loading chart...
HY26 was $371.3m, versus $372.1m in HY24.

BGP Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

Loading chart...
HY26 was 12.6%, versus 16.3% in HY24.

BGP operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

Loading chart...
HY26 was $24.6m, versus $38m in HY24.

BGP working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

Loading chart...
HY26 was $0m, versus -$0.5m in FY23.

Market context

Valuation

These ratios pair a market close from around the result date with verified filing data. An unavailable metric means the required inputs were missing or unsuitable for comparison.

Prices as at close, 4 September 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$1b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

16.89x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.27

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

8.92x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

19.25x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

3.27x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and investment-company measures

Yield and investment-company valuation where supported.

Dividend yield

4.5%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
10 September 2025
Published
22 April 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$371.3m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$29.3m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$24.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

10.0c

flat vs 10.0c

Total assets

$671.5m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofBGP HY26Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

PBT margin compressed to 11.0% — the bottom of Annolyse's four-year half-year range (mean 15.5%, range 11.0%–18.4%) — on revenue of $371.3m, with NPAT margin of 7.9% similarly at the historical floor versus a 10.6% mean

PBT of $41.0m and NPAT of $29.3m on essentially flat revenue describe a result where unit economics have weakened to the lower bound of recent experience.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

What matters

Margins below historical range on flat revenue

PBT margin at 11.0% (mean 15.5%) and NPAT margin at 7.9% (mean 10.6%) say cost pressure, mix, or promotional intensity is compressing unit economics. Revenue at the lower edge of the four-year range means there is no offsetting volume tailwind to absorb the squeeze.

Dividend not covered by free cash flow. The 10cps interim distribution of roughly $22.3m sits against $9.8m of pre-lease FCF, $24.6m of operating cash flow, and $14.9m of capex (4.0% of revenue). The 227.8% payout-to-FCF ratio means distributions plus reinvestment exceeded cash generation this half; sustained, that draws on the $119.8m cash balance rather than being self-funded.

ROE unprecedented while margins fell. ROE of 19.8% sits 6.6 percentage points above the 13.2% four-year mean and outside the 9.8%–16.8% historical range, with no operating leverage to explain it. The likely driver is a smaller equity base after sustained high payouts rather than improved business returns, which means the headline ROE flatters the operating read this period.

Expectations

No FY26 target or earnings shape guidance was disclosed

Annolyse's seasonality reference from FY25 shows HY contributes 46.9% of full-year revenue and 48.3% of NPAT, implying a slightly second-half-weighted profile. Annualised on the current run-rate, revenue would land near $742.5m against FY25's $791.5m — a meaningfully softer trajectory.

What this release does not support is any inference that margin compression is transitory. Management commentary points to an improving sales trend (Q2 +2.07% versus Q1 -2.58%) and online sales growth of +2.92%, but provides no quantitative outlook on margin recovery. The gap matters because typical second-half strength is required merely to hold the historical full-year shape, not to recover the margin loss flagged here.

Quality of result

The result reads as cash-light relative to history

Operating cash flow of $24.6m underwrote $14.9m of capex, leaving only $9.8m of pre-lease FCF and converting just 33.4% of NPAT to free cash. Working capital is not the swing factor: debtor days (2.6) and inventory days (52.0) sit within historical norms, and inventory at $106.0m is essentially unchanged. The cash shortfall is therefore a margin and capex story, not a working-capital one — which means it is unlikely to reverse mechanically next half.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving PBT margin compression to the historical floor — gross margin, operating cost, or product mix?
Why did ROE reach an unprecedented 19.8% while NPAT margin fell to its historical low, and what is the intended equity base going forward?
Is the 10cps interim dividend sustainable when pre-lease FCF covers less than half of it, and at what point does the $119.8m cash balance become a constraint?
How does the segment-level performance in homeware and sporting goods reconcile with the group-level margin compression flagged here?
What sales trajectory does management need in the second half to avoid extending the margin contraction into FY26?

This briefing cannot assess management's qualitative outlook on cost trends or competitive intensity beyond what the disclosed sales-trend metrics imply.

Ask about BGP HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Briscoe Group's HY26 result.

What is driving PBT margin compression to the historical floor — gross margin, operating cost, or product mix?Why does "Margins below historical range on flat revenue" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for BGP after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BGP - HY July 2025 Financial Statements & Independent Auditors Review Report

HY26 / financial report

BGP - HY July 2025 Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement

BGP - HY July 2025 Results Commentary

HY26 / results release

Prior comparable period

HY July 2025 Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report

HY July 2025 Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement

HY July 2025 Results Commentary

HY25 / results release

Full-year context

BGP - FY Jan 2025 Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report

FY25 / financial report

BGP - FY Jan 2025 Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement

BGP - FY Jan 2025 Results Commentary

FY25 / results release

Release context

BGP - Addresses to Annual Meeting 15 May 2025

HY26 / commentary

Get notified when BGP publishes next

Get the next Briscoe Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.