Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
BLIS Technologies (BLT) / FY25

Result released22 May 2025·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

NPAT up 33% as operating cash flow jumped 70% on receivables release

Earnings grew on operating leverage and cash conversion strengthened to 178%, but 73% of NPAT and nearly all operating cash flow landed in the second

Healthcare / Biotechnology

BLT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY25 was $6m, versus $4.8m in HY24.

BLT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
EBITDA margin across covered periods.

BLT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY25 was $0.74m, versus -$0.04m in HY24.

BLT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -$0.2m, versus $0.5m in HY24.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 20 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$20.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

29.24x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.00

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

1.57x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
22 May 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$12.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$1m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$0.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$1.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Declared dividend per share

0.0c

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$0.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Total assets

$14.3m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofBLT FY25·Result released22 May 2025·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Revenue rose 9.7% to $12.6m, with management citing growth in finished product sales and modest B2B growth, partially offset by softness in European ingredient revenue

Operating leverage drove EBITDA up 25.8% to $1.0m, PBT up 28.6% to $0.9m, and NPAT up 33.3% to $0.8m.

The cash result was the standout: net cash from operating activities rose 70% to $1.8m, with cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) lifting to 178.5% from 132.0% prior. Closing cash was broadly flat at $4.2m, and the balance sheet remains debt-free.

The shape was heavily second-half weighted. HY25 contributed only 27.3% of full-year NPAT and just 0.3% of full-year operating cash flow, implying $0.6m of NPAT and $1.8m of OCF in the second half alone.

What matters

Operating leverage is real but off a small base

Revenue growth of 9.7% translated into EBITDA growth of 25.8% and NPAT growth of 33.3%. ROE strengthened to 6.8% from 5.6%. With no debt and a fixed cost base, incremental revenue is dropping through, but absolute earnings remain modest at $0.8m on $12.6m of revenue, so small revenue moves continue to swing the result materially.

Cash conversion was assisted by working-capital release. Receivable days fell to 30.5 from 41, freeing roughly $0.2m of working capital, while inventory days were broadly stable. That helped OCF run at 197.7% of NPAT and FCF at $1.7m on capex of just $0.1m (1.1% of revenue). The conversion is high-quality at the operating level but partly draws on a one-time debtor compression that will not repeat at the same magnitude.

The second-half skew matters for run-rate framing. Almost all of the year's operating cash arrived in H2, which means the headline cash conversion reflects a single strong half rather than a steady cadence. Annualising the H2 run-rate would imply materially higher revenue and earnings, but there is no disclosed shape commentary to confirm whether the second-half strength is structural or timing-driven.

Expectations

No FY26 targets, forward-work backlog, or quantified guidance were supplied

Commentary references "unexpected intellectual property issues" being addressed during the year, but the release does not quantify any associated cost or recovery effect.

Set against the HY25 release, which flagged a 25% revenue lift and $0.3m of EBITDA in the first half, the full-year shape implies the second half ran materially harder on both revenue ($6.7m implied) and profit ($0.6m implied NPAT). Without management framing of seasonality, B2B order timing, or royalty phasing, it is not possible to determine how much of that second-half strength carries into FY26.

Quality of result

The earnings improvement looks largely operational

There are no disclosed non-recurring items in the result, the EBITDA-to-PBT bridge is narrow ($0.1m of D&A and net interest), and the effective tax rate fell only modestly to 5.9% from 7.2%, so tax did not flatter the NPAT line in any meaningful way. PBT growth of 28.6% and NPAT growth of 33.3% are within 5pp of each other, supporting the operating read.

Cash quality is more nuanced. Headline OCF of $1.8m exceeds NPAT of $0.8m by a wide margin, but a meaningful portion of the lift came from a $0.2m operating working-capital release, with debtor days dropping more than ten days. Stripped of that release, cash generation still comfortably covers reported earnings, but the 178.5% conversion ratio is unlikely to repeat without further working-capital tailwinds. Capex of $0.1m is light relative to revenue and may understate the reinvestment needed to sustain growth, particularly given the IP issues referenced in commentary.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did operating cash flow concentrate so heavily in H2, with only $6k of OCF reported in the first half?
What were the "unexpected intellectual property issues" referenced in commentary, and what is the residual cost or risk in FY26?
Why is no dividend declared despite $4.2m of cash, no debt, and FCF of $1.7m, and what is the intended capital allocation framework?
How sustainable is the receivables compression that drove debtor days to 30.5, and is the lower level expected to hold?
What drove the softness in European ingredient revenue, and is that headwind expected to continue into FY26?

This briefing cannot assess underlying segment economics, customer concentration, or the durability of the second-half run-rate without segment-level disclosure or forward guidance.

Chat

Ask about BLT FY25

Ask follow-up questions about BLIS Technologies's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BLT FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about BLIS Technologies's FY25 result.

Why did operating cash flow concentrate so heavily in H2, with only $6k of OCF reported in the first half?Why does "Operating leverage is real but off a small base" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for BLT after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

BLIS Annual Report 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

Financial Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Revenue and earnings growth

FY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Blis Technologies Limited Annual Report FY24

FY24 / financial report↗

Financial Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Financial Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

Interim context

Financial Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Financial Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Half Year Report 30 September 2024

HY25 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 4.7pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 178.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +46.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 9.7% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BLT publishes next

Get the next BLIS Technologies briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.