Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Bremworth (BRW) / HY22

Operating cash swung NZ$18.9m negative as revenue fell 19.2%

Reported NPAT of $1.0m masks a near $19m operating cash reversal driven by a 45.9% jump in receivables and a higher capex spend.

Consumer / Home furnishings

BRW revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $44.7m, versus $88.9m in FY25.

BRW EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 20.7%, versus -19.2% in HY25.

BRW operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was -$1.9m, versus $15.7m in FY25.

BRW working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 BRW: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $7.7m; 4-period range $-2.9m to $6.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$7.7m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.1m.
  • FY26 BRW: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.9m; 4-period range $-1.3m to $7.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.9m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$5.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.9m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$5.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.3m.
Release date
25 February 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY22 vs HY21

Revenue

$48.7m

-19.2% ↓ vs $60.3m

EBITDA

$2.5m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$1m

-76.7% ↓ vs $4.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$1.4m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

$1.3m

-70.5% ↓ vs $4.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$18.5m

-29.5% ↓ vs $26.3m

Total assets

$75.9m

-5.6% ↓ vs $80.4m

What changed

The dominant change is cash, not earnings

Net cash flow from operating activities swung from a $17.5m inflow in HY21 to a $1.4m outflow in HY22, an $18.9m deterioration, while reported NPAT of $1.0m remained positive. Cash on the balance sheet fell to $18.5m from $26.3m.

Revenue declined 19.2% to $48.7m, which management attributes to COVID-19 disruption and supply-chain constraints. PBT fell 70.5% to $1.3m and NPAT fell 76.7% to $4.3m → $1.0m. The 6.2 percentage-point gap between PBT and NPAT growth reflects a tax distortion: HY21 carried an effective tax rate of -3.3% (a credit), versus 22.5% in HY22, so PBT is the cleaner operating read.

Trade debtors rose 45.9% to $12.2m and receivable days lengthened from 25.3 to 45.7. Inventories fell 11.2% in dollar terms but inventory days rose to 78.6 from 71.5 as sales decelerated faster than stock. The group remains debt-free.

What matters

Cash conversion collapsed

OCF/EBITDA ran at -55.2% in HY22 and FCF (pre-lease) of -$3.0m compares with +$16.4m a year earlier; FCF/NPAT was -296.3%. Reported profitability therefore tells you very little about the cash the business actually generated this half, which matters because Bremworth funded operations and a 43.8% lift in capex by drawing down its cash balance rather than by trading.

Working capital absorbed the cash. Receivable days nearly doubled (+20.4 days) and inventory days extended by 7.1 days. Operating working capital rose $1.2m on lower sales — a deterioration in efficiency, not absolute build-up. Until debtors normalise, reported earnings will continue to overstate cash generation.

Underlying operating profitability halved before tax effects. Stripping out the tax-rate swing, PBT fell 70.5% on a 19.2% revenue decline, implying material operating deleverage on a smaller revenue base. ROE dropped to 2.7% from 11.2%. This is the underlying read that the headline NPAT line, distorted by the prior-year tax credit, partly obscures.

Expectations

No forward guidance or stated targets were provided in the release; management describes results as "in line with management expectations" without quantifying that expectation

The HY21 comparable was itself unusually strong: HY21 NPAT of $4.3m exceeded full-year FY21 NPAT of $1.7m, and HY21 operating cash flow was 108% of the FY21 total. The prior half therefore likely flatters the year-on-year decline.

That said, what the release does not support is any specific read on H2 FY22 recovery: there is no order-book disclosure, no margin guidance, and no commentary quantifying when supply-chain and COVID drags ease. The gap matters because cash will only rebuild if debtors are collected and revenue stabilises.

Quality of result

The result is low quality on cash terms and modest on earnings terms

The $1.0m NPAT is supported by a near $19m unfavourable swing in operating cash flow, with the receivables blowout the largest single contributor. Capex stepped up to $1.6m (3.3% of revenue), with management noting over 50% was directed at manufacturing plant improvements — this is investment-led rather than maintenance-driven, but it sharpens the near-term cash drain.

Two structural positives soften the read. First, the balance sheet remains debt-free, so the cash outflow is funded from a $18.5m cash buffer rather than borrowings. Second, the tax line is the larger driver of the NPAT/PBT divergence; the underlying operating decline, while sharp, is not as severe as the -76.7% NPAT figure suggests. Even so, with FCF at -$3.0m and dividends at zero, capital return is appropriately suspended until cash conversion normalises.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did receivable days lengthen from 25.3 to 45.7, and is this customer mix, payment terms, or collection timing?
How much of the $18.9m operating cash swing reverses in H2 as receivables are collected versus represents a permanent reset in working-capital intensity?
What is the expected duration of the supply-chain and COVID drags management cites, and what revenue run-rate underpins second-half planning?
How much further capex is committed to the manufacturing-plant programme, and over what timeframe?
When does the board expect to revisit dividends given the stated "return to dividends" ambition in the strategy slide?

This briefing cannot assess segment-level margins, order-book backlog, or H2 trading trajectory because none of those were disclosed in the supplied release.

Chat

Ask about BRW HY22

Ask follow-up questions about Bremworth's HY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about BRW HY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Bremworth's HY22 result.

Why did receivable days lengthen from 25.3 to 45.7, and is this customer mix, payment terms, or collection timing?Why does "Cash conversion collapsed" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY22?What should I watch next for BRW after HY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

1H22MarketRelease

HY22 / results release↗

1H22ResultsAnnouncement

HY22 / results announcement↗

1H22ResultsPresentation

HY22 / results presentation↗

FY22HalfYearReport

HY22 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

FY21H1Report

HY21 / financial report↗

FY21H1ResultsAnnouncement

HY21 / results release↗

Full-year context

BRWFY21AnnualReport

FY21 / financial report↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Voting Results

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 6.2pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -19.2% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 2.7%, -8.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when BRW publishes next

Get the next Bremworth briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.