Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Cooks Coffee Company (CCC) / FY23

FY23 NPAT swung to a $3.2m loss as below-EBITDA charges crushed thin trading

Positive EBITDA of $0.75m was overwhelmed by impairments, D&A and interest, leaving cash at $0.4m and equity halved to $1.4m.

Consumer / Cafe and coffee franchising

CCC revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was $6.6m, versus $6.6m in FY22.

CCC EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 CCC FY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 11.5%; 3-period range 8.6% to 11.3%. EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 3-period mean 10.2%, range 8.6%-11.3%.
EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 3-period mean 10.2%, range 8.6%-11.3%.

CCC operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was -$0.48m, versus -$0.1m in FY22.

CCC working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 CCC: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-3.7m; 3-period range $0m to $0.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.7m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.7m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 12 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$12.9m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

43.15x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.00

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

11.28x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
30 May 2023
Published
28 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$6.6m

+0.7% ↑ vs $6.6m

EBITDA

$0.75m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

−$3.2m

n/m ↓ vs $0.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$0.48m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

$0.28m

+295.1% ↑ vs −$0.14m

Profit before tax

−$3.2m

n/m ↓ vs $0.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.45m

-61.5% ↓ vs $1.2m

Total assets

$33.9m

-3.4% ↓ vs $35.1m

What changed

NPAT swung to a loss of $3.2m from a $0.3m profit in FY22, with PBT growth of n/m and NPAT growth of n/m

Reported revenue was essentially flat on a like-for-like basis at $6.6m (+0.7%), and group EBITDA was a modest positive $0.75m after absorbing a $0.45m credit impairment on receivables and an impairment of goodwill and intangibles relating to the Triple Two acquisition.

The damage sits below EBITDA: roughly $4.0m of depreciation, amortisation, interest and impairment charges turned a thin operating result into a $3.2m loss. Cash fell 61.5% to $0.4m, equity fell 53.9% to $1.4m, and operating cash flow worsened to -$0.5m from -$0.1m. Net debt of $2.7m equates to roughly 3.6x reported EBITDA.

What matters

Capital structure is now stretched

  • Equity has dropped to $1.4m and cash to $0.4m, while gross borrowings remain at $3.1m. ROE moved from +11.1% to -226.8%. The business has limited headroom to absorb another year of similar below-line charges without external funding.
  • Underlying franchise momentum is real but is not yet sized to the cost base. Franchisee outlet sales rose 24% to NZ$53.6m, recurring group revenue rose 15% to NZ$3.8m, and the dominant UK & IRE franchising segment generated a segment result of $1.3m on $6.4m of revenue. That progress is being consumed by the New Zealand head-office segment (-$1.2m result) and by impairment and amortisation charges associated with prior acquisitions.
  • Cash conversion broke down. Operating cash flow was -64.5% of EBITDA, so even the positive trading number did not translate into cash. With trade receivables flat at $1.3m and receivable days steady around 73, the cash gap reflects the loss-making operations rather than a working-capital build, which means the burn is structural until the franchise system scales further.

Expectations

No stated targets were supplied

HY23 commentary asserted "full year revenue and profit on track to meet expectations" and reported a $0.1m interim profit; the implied second half therefore swung to roughly -$3.3m NPAT on $3.5m of revenue. That is a sharp negative deviation from the half-year tone and is the single largest investor-relevant fact in the release.

Because no forward work or guidance is disclosed, the result does not support any view on FY24 recovery. What it does support is that H2 absorbed the bulk of the impairment and amortisation hit and that the cash and equity exit positions are materially tighter than at HY23.

Quality of result

A meaningful portion of the loss is non-cash (goodwill and intangible impairment, depreciation and amortisation on lease and acquisition-related assets), which means the headline NPAT overstates the cash drag

However, EBITDA already includes the $0.45m credit impairment on receivables, so the $0.75m EBITDA cannot be adjusted upward on that basis without double-counting management's own framing.

The durable signals are mixed. Recurring revenue mix improved to 57.5% from 50.3%, UK & IRE franchising margin moved up to 21.1% from 19.6%, and UK Retail losses narrowed. Against that, operating cash flow worsened, cash halved, and net debt to EBITDA reached 3.6x. The trading recovery is genuine, but the balance-sheet exit position is the part of the result that is hardest to reverse with another year of similar revenue.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the going-concern position and the funding plan given $0.4m of cash, $3.1m of borrowings and continuing operating cash outflow?
Why did the second half deviate so sharply from the HY23 statement that full-year profit was on track, and which charges were genuinely H2 events versus reassessments of prior assumptions?
Are further impairments to Triple Two or other acquired intangibles likely in FY24, and what carrying values remain at risk?
How quickly can the UK and Ireland franchise growth absorb the New Zealand head-office cost base on a cash basis?
What is the path for operating cash flow to turn positive, given EBITDA is already positive but conversion was -64.5%?

This briefing cannot assess covenant headroom, lender support, or the company's internal FY24 budget, none of which is disclosed in the release.

Chat

Ask about CCC FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Cooks Coffee Company's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CCC FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Cooks Coffee Company's FY23 result.

What is the going-concern position and the funding plan given $0.4m of cash, $3.1m of borrowings and continuing operating cash outflow?Why does "Capital structure is now stretched" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for CCC after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

CCC - March 23 Preliminary Report - Directors Commentary

FY23 / results release↗

CCC - March 23 Unaudited Preliminary Results

FY23 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Commentary on Financial Results

FY22 / results release↗

Financial Results

FY22 / financial report↗

Interim context

Interim report

HY23 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.60x for this result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -226.8%, -237.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 0.7% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CCC publishes next

Get the next Cooks Coffee Company briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.