Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Contact Energy (CEN) / FY25

NPAT rose 40.9% but cash conversion fell to 62.4% on working capital build

Reported earnings growth ran well ahead of cash generation as receivables and inventory absorbed NZD 155m of working capital.

Energy & Utilities / Integrated gentailer

CEN revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.6b, versus $3.4b in FY25.

CEN EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY25 CEN: Outside range low ebitda margin. 23.7%; 3-period range 24.7% to 30.9%. EBITDA margin: 23.7%, below normal range; 3-period mean 27.6%, range 24.7%-30.9%.
  • HY26 CEN: Outside range high ebitda margin. 30.9%; 3-period range 23.7% to 27.1%. EBITDA margin: 30.9%, above normal range; 3-period mean 25.2%, range 23.7%-27.1%.
EBITDA margin: 30.9%, above normal range; 3-period mean 25.2%, range 23.7%-27.1%.

CEN operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $308m, versus $544m in FY25.

CEN working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $155m, versus $57m in HY25.
Release date
18 August 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$3.4b

+20.1% ↑ vs $2.9b

Net profit after tax

$331m

+40.9% ↑ vs $235m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$544m

-6.2% ↓ vs $580m

Full-year dividend per share

39.0c

+5.4% ↑ vs 37.0c

EBITDAF

$872m

+29.2% ↑ vs $675m

Profit before tax

$463m

+37.0% ↑ vs $338m

Cash and cash equivalents

$514m

+124.5% ↑ vs $229m

Total assets

$6.8b

+9.7% ↑ vs $6.2b

What changed

Net profit after tax rose 40.9% to NZD 331m on revenue growth of 20.1% to NZD 3,439m, with EBITDAF up 29.2% to NZD 872m and profit before tax up 37.0% to NZD 463m

Operating cash flow, however, fell 6.2% to NZD 544m, so cash conversion (OCF/EBITDAF) dropped from 85.9% to 62.4%. The gap reflects a NZD 155m working-capital absorption: receivable days rose from 20.8 to 27.9 and inventory days from 9.8 to 14.0. Gross borrowings rose 28.0% to NZD 2.4b, but net debt to EBITDAF improved to 2.2x from 2.5x on stronger earnings. Free cash flow of NZD 434m was broadly held against NZD 471m prior, supported by a 22.6% capex reduction to NZD 449m.

What matters

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$30m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence

  1. Cash conversion at 62.4% versus 85.9% prior is the central tension. Reported NPAT grew 40.9%, but the NZD 155m working-capital build means cash earnings did not scale with accounting earnings. For a gentailer this matters because sustained higher receivables and fuel inventory carry would pressure distributable cash even if EBITDAF growth holds.

  2. The retail segment result deteriorated to a NZD 49m loss from a NZD 32m loss, even as retail revenue grew. Wholesale carried the entire segment uplift (result NZD 895m versus NZD 746m). Earnings growth is therefore more reliant on wholesale conditions than the consolidated print suggests, and retail mix is moving against the result, not with it.

  3. Leverage tightened on a ratio basis — net debt/EBITDAF fell to 2.2x from 2.5x — but gross borrowings expanded NZD 536m and cash rose NZD 285m to NZD 514m. The balance sheet is being positioned for a step-up in scale rather than deleveraging from operations.

Expectations

No quantitative full-year targets are disclosed in the supplied material

The shape was second-half weighted on earnings: HY25 delivered 49.6% of revenue but only 42.9% of NPAT, so the second half carried the bulk of profit growth. Repeatability depends on hydrology and wholesale price conditions, neither of which is forecast in the release.

Forward dividend guidance is 40 cents per share against the 39 cents declared for FY25. The full-year payout against pre-lease free cash flow rose to 82.0% from 62.0%, so coverage tightened materially even though the dividend remained covered by FCF on this basis.

Quality of result

Several factors flatter the headline

The effective tax rate fell from 30.5% to 28.5%, widening NPAT growth (+40.9%) above PBT growth (+37.0%) by 3.9 percentage points. More importantly, capex fell 22.6% to NZD 449m and capex intensity dropped from 20.3% to 13.1% of revenue. That reduction is the principal reason free cash flow held at NZD 434m despite operating cash flow falling NZD 36m, and it is why FCF/NPAT prints at 131.1%.

Underlying cash quality is weaker than the EBITDAF growth implies. Cash conversion of 62.4% sits well below the prior comparable, and the NZD 155m working-capital absorption — receivables now at 27.9 days and inventory at 14.0 days — is the dominant driver. Whether that build reverses in FY26 will determine how much of the FY25 earnings uplift converts into distributable cash, particularly with the FCF payout already at 82.0%.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the working-capital absorption of NZD 155m, and is the lift in receivable days to 27.9 and inventory days to 14.0 expected to reverse in FY26?
Why did the retail segment loss widen to NZD 49m on growing revenue, and what is the path back to a positive retail result?
How will the upcoming step-up in scale shape FY26 capex, leverage, and dividend coverage given the 82.0% FCF payout already reached?
What hydrology, hedge, and wholesale price assumptions underpin the 40 cent FY26 dividend guidance?
Is the lower 28.5% effective tax rate sustainable, or does it reflect items not disclosed in the supplied commentary?

This briefing cannot assess hydrology conditions, hedge positioning, or the post-period portfolio integration that will shape FY26 cash generation and leverage trajectory.

Chat

Ask about CEN FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Contact Energy's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CEN FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Contact Energy's FY25 result.

What drove the working-capital absorption of NZD 155m, and is the lift in receivable days to 27.9 and inventory days to 14.0 expected to reverse in FY26?Why does "Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$30m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for CEN after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Contact Energy FY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

Integrated Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

company filing

FY24 / results announcement↗

Integrated Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

Interim context

HY25 Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

HY25 Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NZX HY25 Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Contact accelerates strategy with acquisition of Manawa

FY24 / commentary↗

Investor webcast details, Contact acquisition of Manawa

FY24 / commentary↗

Investor webcast details

FY25 / commentary↗

Contact Energy 2025 Half Year Results Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 62.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -23.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 20.1% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 63.1%, with NPAT payout at 93.8%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 2.20x, -0.30x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CEN publishes next

Get the next Contact Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.