Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Channel Infrastructure NZ (CHI) / FY23

FCF of $61.8m drove deleveraging to 3.6x and a 12.0c dividend

PBT rose 47.6% while NPAT rose 100.8% on a lower effective tax rate; the 12.0c payout reached 187.5% of NPAT, funded by free cash flow.

Transport & Infrastructure / Fuel infrastructure

CHI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $140.2m, versus $70.2m in HY25.

CHI EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 31.5%; 4-period range 65.1% to 68%. EBITDA margin: 31.5%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 66.6%, range 65.1%-68.0%.
  • FY24 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 68%; 4-period range 31.5% to 66.7%. EBITDA margin: 68.0%, above normal range; 4-period mean 57.5%, range 31.5%-66.7%.
  • HY25 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 69%; 3-period range 65.9% to 68.9%. EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.
EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.

CHI operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $74.4m, versus $39.7m in HY25.

CHI working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-12.8m; 4-period range $-4.4m to $0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-12.8m, unprecedented low; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-2.5m.
  • HY22 CHI: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-11.4m; 3-period range $-5.5m to $21.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-11.4m, below normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$21.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY23 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $21.5m; 3-period range $-11.4m to $-1.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$21.5m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-6.2m.
  • FY25 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $0.5m; 4-period range $-12.8m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Release date
29 February 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$130.7m

+48.1% ↑ vs $88.2m

EBITDA

$87.2m

+51.7% ↑ vs $57.5m

Net profit after tax

$24.1m

+100.8% ↑ vs $12m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$36.7m

+359.8% ↑ vs −$14.1m

Full-year dividend per share

12.0c

+71.4% ↑ vs 7.0c

Operating profit

$51.8m

+57.6% ↑ vs $32.8m

Profit before tax

$34.1m

+47.6% ↑ vs $23.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$4.9m

+104.1% ↑ vs $2.4m

What changed

The first full year operating as an import terminal converted into $61.8m of normalised free cash flow and reduced leverage to 3.6x EBITDA from 4.5x, which supported a 12.0c full-year dividend that exceeded reported NPAT

Revenue grew 48.1% to $130.7m and EBITDA grew 51.7% to $87.2m as continuing operations annualised under the new business model and jet fuel demand continued to recover. PBT rose 47.6% to $34.1m, while reported NPAT rose 100.8% to $24.1m because the effective tax rate fell to 19.0% from 28.3%. Operating cash flow swung to a $36.7m inflow from a $14.1m outflow. Gross borrowings rose 23.5% to $320.6m, so the leverage ratio improved on faster EBITDA growth rather than debt reduction. A $3.6m loss from the discontinued operation continued to drag on NPAT.

What matters

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$460m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence

The cleaner operating read is PBT growth of 47.6%, not NPAT growth of 100.8%. The 53.2 percentage-point gap between those two numbers reflects a 9.3 percentage-point drop in the effective tax rate, not underlying earnings power. This matters because valuation multiples anchored on reported NPAT will overstate the run-rate improvement unless the lower tax rate is sustainable, which the release does not explain.

The 12.0c full-year dividend (including a 1.5c special) was 187.5% of FY23 NPAT and is being funded out of free cash flow rather than reported earnings. That coverage depends on the gap between EBITDA and net cash capex, which remained heavy at 48.2% of revenue while the jet storage project was being completed. The dividend looks supportable while non-maintenance capex unwinds, but the payout policy is not sustainable at current NPAT if capex stays elevated and debt cannot keep absorbing the gap.

Leverage improvement to 3.6x net debt/EBITDA came almost entirely from EBITDA growth; gross borrowings rose $61.0m over the year. This matters because the balance-sheet flexibility narrative is contingent on the new EBITDA base proving durable rather than on actual debt repayment.

Expectations

No forward EBITDA, capex or dividend guidance is supplied in the material provided here, so the release cannot be tested against a stated FY24 target

Management did flag that the FY23 result landed at the top end of August guidance and that throughput tracked slightly ahead of Envisory's fuel demand outlook, with jet fuel still recovering toward pre-COVID levels.

The half-year shape was unusually even: HY23 carried 49.3% of full-year revenue, 50.0% of EBITDA and 47.5% of NPAT. There is therefore no seasonal kicker built into the H2 result that would not repeat, which means FY24 has to lean on demand growth and capex moderation rather than a phasing tailwind. The completion of the 100 million litre private jet storage project is the most concrete forward catalyst flagged in the release.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is mixed

The EBITDA and PBT step-ups are durable in that they reflect a full year of import-terminal economics rather than one-off items, and the dominant Infrastructure segment posted a 67% disclosed gross margin. However, current OCF/EBITDA conversion of 42.1% is lighter than typical for an infrastructure business, and the swing from a prior-period operating cash outflow is partly a working-capital normalisation rather than a clean earnings translation: trade debtors fell to 17.8m from 19.0m and receivable days dropped from 78.6 to 49.7, with the prior figure itself distorted by the business-model transition.

Free cash flow at 256.8% of NPAT exists primarily because depreciation is large and there was no major working-capital outflow this year. That ratio will compress as the capex programme rolls forward into a steady-state mix. The 9.3 percentage-point fall in the effective tax rate also lifted reported NPAT without an obvious recurring driver in the release, so the doubling of headline profit should be treated as partly tax-assisted rather than fully operating-driven.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the effective tax rate fall to 19.0% from 28.3%, and is that rate sustainable into FY24?
What is the expected maintenance capex run-rate once the jet storage project is fully commissioned, and how does that change normalised FCF?
How will the board approach dividend policy if NPAT payout stays above 100% and FCF compresses as capex normalises?
What remaining cash and accounting impacts from the discontinued refining operation are still to flow through?
Why did gross borrowings rise $61.0m in a year of strong operating cash generation, and what does the maturity and hedge profile look like over the next two years?

This briefing cannot assess whether the FY23 throughput, EBITDA margin and tax rate represent a stable run-rate without management's FY24 guidance and a clearer view of post-project capex intensity.

Chat

Ask about CHI FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Channel Infrastructure NZ's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CHI FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Channel Infrastructure NZ's FY23 result.

Why did the effective tax rate fall to 19.0% from 28.3%, and is that rate sustainable into FY24?Why does "Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$460m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for CHI after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY23 Annual Report and FY23 Financial Statements

FY23 / financial report↗

FY23 company filing

FY23 / results announcement↗

FY23 Results Market Release

FY23 / results release↗

FY23 Results Presentation

FY23 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

FY22 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

FY22 Investor Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

FY22 Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

FY22 Results Commentary

FY22 / results release↗

Interim context

HY23 Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

HY23 Investor Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

HY23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

HY23 Results Commentary

HY23 / results release↗

Release context

Channel releases strategy refresh

FY23 / commentary↗

2023 ASM Presentation

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 53.2pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.60x, -0.90x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 42.1% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +66.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 187.5%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CHI publishes next

Get the next Channel Infrastructure NZ briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.