Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Channel Infrastructure NZ (CHI) / HY24

NPAT up 46% but PBT slipped 2% as discontinued operation flatters headline

Continuing operations softened and the effective tax rate jumped to 35.0%, even as EBITDA grew 10.5% on stronger jet fuel throughput.

Transport & Infrastructure / Fuel infrastructure

CHI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $140.2m, versus $70.2m in HY25.

CHI EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 31.5%; 4-period range 65.1% to 68%. EBITDA margin: 31.5%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 66.6%, range 65.1%-68.0%.
  • FY24 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 68%; 4-period range 31.5% to 66.7%. EBITDA margin: 68.0%, above normal range; 4-period mean 57.5%, range 31.5%-66.7%.
  • HY25 CHI: Outside range high ebitda margin. 69%; 3-period range 65.9% to 68.9%. EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.
EBITDA margin: 69.0%, above normal range; 3-period mean 67.5%, range 65.9%-68.9%.

CHI operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $74.4m, versus $39.7m in HY25.

CHI working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 CHI: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-12.8m; 4-period range $-4.4m to $0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-12.8m, unprecedented low; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-2.5m.
  • HY22 CHI: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-11.4m; 3-period range $-5.5m to $21.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-11.4m, below normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$21.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY23 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $21.5m; 3-period range $-11.4m to $-1.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$21.5m, above normal range; 0/3 prior periods had builds, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-6.2m.
  • FY25 CHI: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $0.5m; 4-period range $-12.8m to $-0.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.5m, above normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.1m.
Release date
23 August 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$69.8m

+8.4% ↑ vs $64.4m

EBITDA

$48.1m

+10.5% ↑ vs $43.5m

Net profit after tax

$16.6m

+45.6% ↑ vs $11.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$36.8m

+73.0% ↑ vs $21.3m

Interim dividend per share

4.4c

+4.8% ↑ vs 4.2c

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.4m

-28.8% ↓ vs $1.9m

Total assets

$968.4m

+1.2% ↑ vs $957.1m

What changed

Headline NPAT of NZ$16.6m was up 45.6% on HY23, but profit before tax fell 2.0% to NZ$19.7m

The gap is explained by the discontinued operation, which swung from a NZ$3.1m loss in HY23 to a NZ$3.8m gain in HY24, and by a step-up in the effective tax rate to 35.0% from 28.0% on the historical baseline (above the supplied 27.5%–28.8% range). On the operating line, revenue rose 8.4% to NZ$69.8m and EBITDA rose 10.5% to NZ$48.1m, supported by 8% throughput growth and 22% growth in jet fuel demand. Continuing operations NPAT declined to NZ$12.8m from NZ$14.5m. Operating cash flow lifted 73% to NZ$36.8m; gross borrowings rose to NZ$328.3m from NZ$297.3m, holding net debt/EBITDA flat at 6.8x.

What matters

PBT is the cleaner read, and it went backwards

  • EBITDA grew 10.5% but PBT fell 2.0%, meaning depreciation and finance costs absorbed the entire EBITDA gain plus a small additional drag. Continuing operations NPAT then fell ~11% because the effective tax rate stepped up to 35.0% from 28.0%, well above Annolyse's historical 27.5%–28.8% range. The implication: underlying earnings power did not improve, even though the top of the P&L looks healthier.

  • Cash conversion looks strong but capex did the work. OCF/EBITDA rose to 76.5% from 48.8%, and FCF pre-lease of NZ$32.7m is at the upper edge of the supplied historical range (mean NZ$6.5m). However, capex fell 28.9% to NZ$23.3m (33.3% of revenue versus 50.8% in HY23), and operating working capital released NZ$5.5m as debtor days fell from 59.7 to 41.1. So a meaningful share of the cash uplift is timing rather than recurring conversion.

  • Capital allocation is being held against weaker cover. The 4.4cps interim dividend (up from 4.2cps) sits at 100.0% of NPAT and 50.8% of pre-lease FCF, both within the supplied historical range. With continuing operations earnings down and leverage at 6.8x, the dividend is supported by current FCF but not by underlying continuing earnings alone.

Expectations

The release reaffirms FY24 guidance and adds a 10-year jet fuel storage contract expected to generate ~NZ$55m of additional revenue (pre-PPI indexation) from Q1 2027 — a multi-year shape item rather than a current-period catalyst

Against the supplied first-half shape, HY23 represented ~49% of FY23 revenue and ~50% of FY23 EBITDA, so HY24 implies a flat to modestly second-half-weighted full year on continuing operations if current trends persist.

The release does not provide an explanation for the elevated 35.0% effective tax rate or for whether the discontinued operation contribution recurs in H2; both gaps are material to converting HY24 into a credible FY24 NPAT shape.

Quality of result

The operating revenue and EBITDA growth look durable, anchored to throughput and a structural lift in jet fuel demand rather than one-off items

Beneath that, however, the result is lower quality than the +45.6% NPAT line suggests: the discontinued operation contributed a ~NZ$6.9m year-on-year swing after tax, the tax rate is well above the historical baseline, and continuing operations earnings declined.

The cash result is genuinely strong on the headline but partially balance-sheet-assisted. Of the NZ$15.5m year-on-year uplift in operating cash flow, NZ$5.5m came from working capital — primarily a 18.6-day reduction in debtor days. Capex was also unusually low for the period; if FY24 spend reverts to recent norms, second-half free cash flow will be materially lower than first-half, and the dividend cover on a full-year FCF basis will tighten relative to the HY24 snapshot.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the effective tax rate step up to 35.0%, and is that a one-off or a new baseline?
What drove the ~11% decline in continuing operations NPAT, and is the depreciation/finance-cost mix reset for the run rate?
What does the discontinued operation gain of NZ$3.8m relate to, and is any further contribution expected in H2?
Will capex normalise in H2 toward the prior-year level, and what is the FY24 capex envelope underlying guidance?
How does the new 10-year jet fuel storage contract phase between commissioning capex and the Q1 2027 revenue start?

This briefing cannot assess underlying segment economics or contracted forward revenue beyond the disclosed dominant infrastructure segment and the single new 10-year contract reference.

Chat

Ask about CHI HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Channel Infrastructure NZ's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CHI HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Channel Infrastructure NZ's HY24 result.

Why did the effective tax rate step up to 35.0%, and is that a one-off or a new baseline?Why does "PBT is the cleaner read, and it went backwards" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for CHI after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

HY24 company filing

HY24 / results announcement↗

HY24 Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

HY24 Results Investor Presentation

HY24 / results presentation↗

HY24 Results Market Release

HY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

HY23 Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

HY23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

HY23 Results Commentary

HY23 / results release↗

Full-year context

FY23 Annual Report and FY23 Financial Statements

FY23 / financial report↗

FY23 company filing

FY23 / results announcement↗

FY23 Results Market Release

FY23 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 6.80x, 0.00x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 47.6pp.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 76.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +27.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 90.3%, with NPAT payout at 100.0%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CHI publishes next

Get the next Channel Infrastructure NZ briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.