Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Chorus (CNU) / FY24

EBITDA grew 3.7% but PBT collapsed 80.2% as finance costs erased operating gains

Net debt climbed past $2.5bn and leverage rose to 3.7x EBITDA, yet the final dividend was lifted 35.7% while NPAT fell into loss.

Telecommunications & Media / Telecommunications infrastructure

CNU revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY24 was $503m, versus $487m in HY23.

CNU EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 CNU HY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 69%; 3-period range 69.2% to 70.6%. EBITDA margin: 69.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 70.0%, range 69.2%-70.6%.
EBITDA margin: 69.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 70.0%, range 69.2%-70.6%.

CNU operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY24 was $243m, versus $238m in HY23.

CNU working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was $3m, versus $26m in HY23.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$4.1b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

170.48x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.06

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

10.15x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

9.19x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

9.52x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

6.2%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
26 August 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$1b

+4.7% ↑ vs $965m

EBITDA

$700m

+3.7% ↑ vs $675m

Net profit after tax

−$9m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$513m

-10.0% ↓ vs $570m

Final dividend per share

28.5c

+35.7% ↑ vs 21.0c

Profit before tax

$21m

-80.2% ↓ vs $106m

Cash and cash equivalents

$45m

-48.9% ↓ vs $88m

Total assets

$6b

+2.8% ↑ vs $5.8b

What changed

Revenue grew 4.7% to $1,010.0m and EBITDA rose 3.7% to $700.0m, but everything below the EBITDA line moved the wrong way

Profit before tax fell -80.2% from $106.0m to $21.0m, and net profit after tax swung from a $64.0m gain to a $9.0m loss (-114.1%). Operating profit itself only slipped 4.0% to $238.0m, so the bulk of the PBT collapse sits in higher depreciation and finance costs rather than in trading.

The balance sheet absorbed the shortfall. Gross borrowings rose $304.0m to $2.6b, cash fell from $88.0m to $45.0m, and net debt-to-EBITDA stepped up from 3.3x to 3.7x. Total equity declined 18.3% to $841.0m. Operating cash flow fell 10.0% to $513.0m even though EBITDA grew, and the final dividend was raised 35.7% to 28.5 cents per share.

What matters

Capital structure is now driving the earnings line

EBITDA was up but PBT fell -80.2%, which means the incremental depreciation on the fibre asset base and higher interest on $304.0m of additional borrowings are now larger than Chorus's operating uplift. This matters because revenue growth no longer flows to statutory profit, and any further rise in average funding cost will keep NPAT pressured even if EBITDA continues to expand.

Cash conversion weakened materially. OCF/EBITDA dropped from 84.4% to 73.3%, so $25.0m of additional EBITDA produced $57.0m less operating cash. Capex remains heavy at $442.0m, or 43.8% of revenue, leaving FCF pre-lease at $71.0m versus $78.0m in FY23. The business is still self-funding capex, but the buffer above the dividend and interest bill has thinned.

The dividend was lifted into a loss-making year. With NPAT at -$9.0m and FCF pre-lease of $71.0m, a 28.5 cps unimputed dividend cannot be covered by current-year earnings and is only thinly covered by free cash. The implication is that the higher distribution is being supported by debt headroom rather than by improving profitability.

Expectations

No FY25 numerical targets are supplied in the extraction set, and there is no forward-work or order-book metric to anchor on

The half-year shape is informative: HY24 carried $26.0m of NPAT, implying a roughly $35.0m loss in the second half, while EBITDA was almost evenly split (HY24 47% of full year). That points to depreciation, finance costs, or below-the-line items intensifying through 2H rather than a trading deterioration.

Without management guidance attached here, the read-through is that FY25 NPAT is unlikely to recover materially unless either depreciation rolls off or finance costs stabilise; EBITDA growth alone, on the FY24 trajectory, is not sufficient to lift PBT back to FY23 levels.

Quality of result

The result is low quality on two dimensions

First, the effective tax rate of 142.9% (versus 39.6% prior) tipped a small pre-tax profit into a reported loss, indicating non-deductible items, deferred-tax adjustments, or write-downs are influencing the bottom line; PBT is the cleaner operating read. Second, FCF/NPAT of -788.9% reflects how little of the cash result reaches statutory earnings once depreciation and interest are charged, so the apparent EBITDA growth overstates economic progress.

Working capital is benign – receivable days at 36.1 versus 36.7 prior, and trade debtors only $3.0m higher – so the cash conversion drop is not driven by debtor stretch. The deterioration sits in non-debtor working capital and timing, which is more reversible than a structural debtor problem but does not yet explain the full $57.0m OCF shortfall against rising EBITDA. ROE has fallen to -1.1% from 6.2% as both earnings weakened and equity contracted.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the 142.9% effective tax rate, and is any portion of the resulting loss expected to reverse in FY25?
Why did operating cash flow fall $57.0m while EBITDA rose $25.0m, and which working-capital or timing items account for the gap?
How will the board sustain a 28.5 cps dividend when FY24 NPAT is negative and FCF pre-lease is only $71.0m against a $304.0m increase in gross borrowings?
What is the expected trajectory of depreciation and net interest expense in FY25 given the build-out is maturing but debt has stepped up?
Will leverage at 3.7x net debt-to-EBITDA remain inside Chorus's tolerance if EBITDA growth slows or capex stays near 43.8% of revenue?

This briefing cannot assess Chorus's regulatory revenue path, fibre uptake economics, or covenant-level leverage limits because none of those are quantified in the supplied data.

Chat

Ask about CNU FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Chorus's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about CNU FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Chorus's FY24 result.

What is driving the 142.9% effective tax rate, and is any portion of the resulting loss expected to reverse in FY25?Why does "Capital structure is now driving the earnings line" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for CNU after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report - FY24

FY24 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation - FY24 results

FY24 / results presentation↗

Media Release - FY24 results

FY24 / media release↗

NZX Financial Results Announcement - FY24

FY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

FY22 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

FY22 Results Media Release

FY23 / media release↗

Interim context

Half year results details: Tuesday 27 February 2024

HY24 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 73.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -11.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.70x, +0.40x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -1.1%, -7.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when CNU publishes next

Get the next Chorus briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.