Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Delegat Group (DGL) / FY24

NPAT halved despite flat EBITDA as H2 swung to a loss

The effective tax rate jumped to 49.0%, receivable days extended from 51 to 74, and the held 20c dividend now consumes 64.5% of reported earnings.

Consumer / Wine and beverages

DGL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was -$5.1m, versus $32.5m in HY24.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 9 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$374.2m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

6.31x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.59

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

0.08x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

5.66x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

5.13x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

0.63x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

5.4%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
7 August 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$378.3m

-0.8% ↓ vs $381.4m

EBITDA

$128.5m

+0.3% ↑ vs $128.1m

Net profit after tax

$31.4m

-51.5% ↓ vs $64.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$56.9m

-4.8% ↓ vs $59.7m

Final dividend per share

20.0c

flat vs 20.0c

Operating profit

$81.3m

-22.2% ↓ vs $104.5m

Profit before tax

$61.6m

-31.4% ↓ vs $89.8m

Cash and cash equivalents

$9.4m

+42.0% ↑ vs $6.6m

What changed

Reported net profit after tax fell 51.5% to $31.4m on essentially flat revenue (-0.8% to $378.3m) and broadly flat EBITDA ($128.5m vs $128.1m)

The damage occurred below the EBITDA line: higher depreciation and finance costs pulled operating profit down 22.2% to $81.3m, PBT growth was -31.4% to $61.6m, and a jump in the effective tax rate from 27.8% to 49.0% widened the gap to NPAT.

The H2 shape is sharper still. With HY24 NPAT already $33.4m, implied H2 NPAT was -$2.1m. Operating cash flow slipped 4.8% to $56.9m while capex was scaled back 35.1% to $66.0m, and the dividend was held at 20c, lifting the NPAT payout ratio to 64.5% from 31.2%.

What matters

Reported earnings tell a different story to management's preferred measures

The release highlights Operating EBITDA up 7% and Operating NPAT up 1% to $59.7m, but statutory NPAT fell to $31.4m and statutory revenue declined 0.8% rather than rising 1%. With the bridge between operating and reported measures not detailed in the supplied excerpts, the cleaner operating read is PBT growth of -31.4%.

The capex cycle is now in the P&L and balance sheet. Capex of $66.0m (17.4% of revenue) follows $101.7m in FY23. Gross borrowings of $369.5m against $9.4m cash leave net debt at $360.1m and net debt/EBITDA at 2.8x. Rising depreciation and interest - not trading volume or price - are doing most of the work in compressing reported profit.

Working capital tightened on receivables. Trade debtors rose 42.3% to $76.4m and receivable days extended from 51 to 74. Inventories fell $27.8m (-13.3%), softening the cash impact, but the receivables extension is the harder signal: distributors paying more slowly, or sales loaded into the back end of the year.

Expectations

No quantified forward targets are supplied

With HY24 NPAT of $33.4m and FY24 NPAT of $31.4m, the implied H2 loss sets a low base for FY25 comparisons but also signals that the H2 pressure - whether finance cost, FX, mix or tax - was running at the balance date.

Global case sales of 3.6m were down 2% on FY23 despite price increases. The supplied excerpts do not provide guidance on volumes, vintage release, or the trajectory of finance costs as the heavy capex cycle moderates, so investors must judge from the second-half run-rate rather than a stated path.

Quality of result

The EBITDA print was supported by a $27.8m inventory drawdown and a $35.7m reduction in capex, not by underlying trading growth

Cash conversion deteriorated, with OCF/EBITDA falling to 44.3% from 46.6%, and free cash flow before leases remains negative at -$9.1m (vs -$42.0m prior). The improvement in FCF reflects spending less, not earning more.

The 49.0% effective tax rate is more than 21 percentage points above the prior comparable, and the release excerpts do not explain it. If one-off, NPAT understates a normalised result; if structural, it persists. Either way, PBT growth of -31.4% is the more reliable operating read.

The held 20c dividend, with payout at 64.5% of NPAT and FCF pre-lease still negative, is being funded from the balance sheet rather than free cash flow generated in the year. That is sustainable while the syndicated facility headroom is available, but it is not self-funding distribution.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did the effective tax rate jump to 49.0%, and is the elevated level a one-off or ongoing?
What drove the $22.7m (42.3%) increase in trade debtors, and how much has been collected since balance date?
How does management reconcile reported NPAT of $31.4m with the Operating NPAT of $59.7m highlighted in the release?
Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.
What is the expected trajectory of finance costs and depreciation in FY25 as the recent capex program annualises?

This briefing cannot assess vintage quality, FX hedging mechanics, distributor inventory positions, or the syndicated facility covenant headroom beyond what is implied by the disclosed numbers.

Chat

Ask about DGL FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Delegat Group's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about DGL FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Delegat Group's FY24 result.

Why did the effective tax rate jump to 49.0%, and is the elevated level a one-off or ongoing?Why does "Reported earnings tell a different story to management's preferred measures" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for DGL after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

DGL - 2024 Results Announcement

FY24 / financial report↗

DGL - 2024 Results Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

DGL - 2024 Results Release to Media

FY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

DGL - 2023 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

DGL - 2023 Results Release to Media

FY23 / financial report↗

Interim context

DGL - 2024 Interim results announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

DGL - 2024 Interim results announcement

HY24 / results release↗

DGL - 2024 Interim Results to 31 December 2023

HY24 / financial report↗

Release context

DGL - 2024 Interim results presentation

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 44.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -2.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 20.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 2.80x, +2.28x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 64.5%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when DGL publishes next

Get the next Delegat Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.