Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
EBOS Group (EBO) / FY25

Reported PBT fell 21.1% while cash conversion rose to 75.3%

Reported revenue and earnings fell sharply against a non-comparable prior period, but cash generation and leverage strengthened materially.

Healthcare / Healthcare distribution

EBO revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.8b, versus $12.3b in FY25.

EBO EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 4.5%, versus 4.5% in FY25.

EBO operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $46.6m, versus $418.5m in FY25.

EBO working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $348m, versus $97.4m in FY25.
Release date
27 August 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$12.3b

-7.0% ↓ vs $13.2b

EBITDA

$555.6m

-8.3% ↓ vs $605.6m

Net profit after tax

$215.1m

-20.8% ↓ vs $271.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$418.5m

+20.2% ↑ vs $348.2m

Full-year dividend per share

118.5c

+92.7% ↑ vs 61.5c

Operating profit

$408.7m

-14.3% ↓ vs $476.7m

Profit before tax

$302.2m

-21.1% ↓ vs $383.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$184.3m

-15.0% ↓ vs $216.9m

What changed

Reported revenue fell 7.0% to $12.3bn, reported EBITDA fell 8.3% to $555.6m, reported PBT fell 21.1% to $302.2m and reported NPAT fell 20.8% to $215.1m

The supplied event overlays flag the prior comparable as non-comparable and note acquisition activity in both the prior year and the interim period; management separately discloses underlying revenue growth of 12.0% and underlying EBITDA of $585m (up 7.5%), inside the disclosed guidance range of $575–600m. Underlying NPAT of $257.5m was still down 15.1%.

Cash generation strengthened materially: operating cash flow rose to $418.5m from $348.2m, lifting OCF/EBITDA to 75.3% from 57.5%. Free cash flow rose to $273m from $229.8m, taking FCF/NPAT to 126.9% (from 84.6%). Net debt fell to $918.3m and Net debt/EBITDA edged to 1.65x from 1.68x.

What matters

The reported decline overstates underlying deterioration, but underlying NPAT still fell

Capital raise is explicitly linked in the filing to balance-sheet leverage, with NZ$1.6b capital raised.

Reported revenue and PBT moved against a non-comparable base; management discloses 12.0% underlying revenue growth and 7.5% underlying EBITDA growth in line with guidance. Below EBITDA, however, underlying NPAT still fell 15.1%, so margin compression from D&A and finance costs is visible even on the company's own underlying basis. The headline numbers therefore should not be read as a clean operational decline, but the underlying numbers do not signal a full recovery either.

Cash conversion strengthened despite working-capital pressure. OCF/EBITDA improved by roughly 17.8 percentage points to 75.3%, and FCF/NPAT of 126.9% well exceeds the 84.6% prior reading. This matters because the uplift held even as inventories rose 11.1% ($134.8m), inventory days lifted to 40.0 from 33.5 and receivable days rose to 40.7 from 38.8 — suggesting prior-year working-capital absorption is now reversing through cash.

Dividend cover versus reported NPAT is now stretched. The full-year distribution of 118.5 cents implies a 108.0% payout of reported NPAT, against 43.5% in FY24, although FCF coverage sits comfortably at 44.4%. This matters because the policy is now effectively anchored to underlying earnings and cash rather than reported NPAT.

Expectations

EBOS confirmed underlying EBITDA of $585m, inside the disclosed range of $575–600m

No forward targets were supplied in the extraction, so this briefing focuses on what the release does and does not support. The HY25 share of FY25 was 48.8% of revenue, 49.6% of EBITDA and 51.4% of NPAT, indicating broadly balanced halves with a marginally softer H2 NPAT.

The release does not provide quantified FY26 guidance. The gap between the 12.0% underlying revenue growth signal and the 15.1% underlying NPAT decline means the forward shape — particularly margin and finance-cost recovery — remains an open question.

Quality of result

Cash quality is the strongest feature of this result

Operating cash flow rose roughly 20% to $418.5m and free cash flow reached $273m even though net working capital absorbed $97.4m. Inventory days rose 6.5 days and receivable days rose 1.8 days, so the cash gain came in spite of, not because of, working-capital dynamics. Capex rose to $146m (1.2% of revenue, from 0.9%), which moderated but did not consume the uplift. The strengthening leverage profile (1.65x Net debt/EBITDA, down from 1.68x) reinforces the cash read.

Earnings quality is more nuanced. Reported NPAT sits roughly $42m below underlying NPAT, with the gap attributed in the release to M&A transaction costs, non-recurring restructuring/site transition costs and PPA amortisation. The effective tax rate of 28.6% (vs 28.7%) shows tax did not distort the read; PBT and NPAT growth moved together (-21.1% vs -20.8%), so reported PBT is the cleanest operating read. Durability depends on how genuinely non-recurring the add-backs prove to be.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did reported revenue fall from $13.2bn to $12.3bn when underlying revenue grew 12.0%, and what residual reported-base headwind carries into FY26?
Why did inventory days rise to 40.0 from 33.5, and is the $134.8m inventory build tied to specific contracts or general supply-chain positioning?
How sustainable is the 7.5% underlying EBITDA growth once M&A and restructuring add-backs normalise, given underlying NPAT still fell 15.1%?
Can the dividend policy continue at 118.5 cents if reported NPAT does not recover toward underlying levels?
What drives the path back from FY25 ROE of 7.9% (vs 11.2%) toward prior levels?

This briefing cannot assess whether the disclosed underlying growth is repeatable beyond FY25 or what the FY26 trading shape is expected to look like.

Chat

Ask about EBO FY25

Ask follow-up questions about EBOS Group's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about EBO FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about EBOS Group's FY25 result.

Why did reported revenue fall from $13.2bn to $12.3bn when underlying revenue grew 12.0%, and what residual reported-base headwind carries into FY26?Why does "The reported decline overstates underlying deterioration, but underlying NPAT still fell" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for EBO after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

Interim context

Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Release context

Annual Meeting and Director Nominations

FY24 / commentary↗

Annual Meeting and Director Nominations

FY25 / commentary↗

Annual Meeting Presentations

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 108.0%.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 75.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +17.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 1.65x, -0.03x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.3pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when EBO publishes next

Get the next EBOS Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.