Revenue
$18.7m
+16.3% ↑ vs $16.1m
Australia booked a $1.7m segment loss and operating cash flow turned negative, with cash on hand down 57% as Kilimanjaro integration weighed
Revenue context before the current result.
Operating profit margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY22 vs FY21
Revenue
$18.7m
+16.3% ↑ vs $16.1m
Net profit after tax
−$1.8m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Net cash inflow from operating activities
−$0.15m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Operating profit
−$1.8m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Profit before tax
−$2.4m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Cash and cash equivalents
$1.2m
-56.7% ↓ vs $2.8m
Total assets
$21.9m
-4.1% ↓ vs $22.8m
What changed
Profit before tax swung to a $2.4m loss from a $0.4m profit (–754.1%), and NPAT swung to a $1.8m loss from a $1.1m profit (–267.2%). Operating cash flow turned negative at –$0.1m, against a $2.2m inflow in FY21, and cash on hand fell 57% to $1.2m while gross borrowings rose from $0.05m to $0.9m.
The Australia segment is the visible cause: on $12.5m of revenue (67% of group) it generated a $1.7m segment loss, while New Zealand contributed only $0.04m and EMEA/North America added further small losses. Total equity declined 17.7% to $11.4m.
What matters
The segment contributes two-thirds of revenue but delivered a $1.7m loss, and management attributes the underperformance to a slower-than-expected single-brand integration following the Kilimanjaro acquisition referenced in the HY22 release. Until that division's margin recovers, group earnings remain hostage to one geography.
Cash quality fell with reported earnings. Operating cash flow swung by $2.4m year on year to –$0.1m, capex was steady at $0.2m, and the resulting pre-lease free cash burn of $0.3m – combined with the borrowings step-up to $0.9m – consumed roughly $1.6m of cash buffer. Receivable days lengthened modestly to 62.1 from 59.5, and operating working capital absorbed about $1.2m of cash. The business is now closer to its funding limits than the headline revenue growth implies.
The tax line softens the optics, but not the read. A 9.4% effective tax rate on the loss converted –$2.4m PBT into –$1.8m NPAT, narrowing the reported gap. PBT growth of –754.1% is the cleaner operating measure and is the figure to anchor on; the –267.2% NPAT change understates the underlying deterioration.
Expectations
The HY22 commentary flagged that price increases were implemented and that the "seasonally stronger second half" was expected to drive "significant improvements in operating" performance. The implied second-half NPAT of –$0.8m (versus –$1.0m at HY22) shows that half-on-half loss did narrow, but the second half still ran at a loss rather than recovering to profit. Implied 2H revenue of $9.8m points to a higher run-rate but not yet one that covers the Australia cost base.
Management has stated the single-brand integration is "now completed" and that synergies are expected to restore the Enterprise Division's previous profitability. The release does not quantify when that returns to a profit run-rate, so the trajectory is directional only.
Quality of result
Revenue growth is real, but it sat alongside an unprofitable Australia segment, a swing to operating cash outflow, and a working-capital absorption of roughly $1.2m. FCF-to-NPAT conversion of 17.8% – itself a low number – flatters reality because both numerator and denominator are losses; pre-lease FCF was –$0.3m. ROE moved to –16.2% from +8.0%.
The balance sheet is still in a small net cash position of $0.4m, but the buffer has compressed sharply from $2.8m a year ago. With borrowings now drawn for the first time at meaningful scale and equity down 17.7%, the business has materially less capacity to absorb a second year of operating cash deficit, which means recovery in Australia matters not just for earnings but for liquidity.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess the underlying profitability of Kilimanjaro or the Australian operations on a like-for-like organic basis because segment-level prior-period comparatives and gross margin disclosure are not supplied.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Enprise Group's FY22 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
FY22 Results Announcement
FY22 / financial reportResults Announcement FY22
FY22 / results announcementUnaudited Audited Announcement FY22
FY22 / results presentation30 June 2021 Annual Report with Audit Report
FY21 / financial reportHalf Year Report - December 2021
HY22 / financial reportRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.
ROE and capital efficiency
ROE was -16.2%, -24.1pp versus the prior comparable period.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 16.3% for this reporting period.
Working-capital pressure
Debtor days were 62 days for this result.
Get the next Enprise Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.