Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Enprise Group (ENS) / HY25

Enprise swings to profit on 21.2% revenue growth but FCF turns negative

Operating cash flow fell 57.6% to NZD 0.3m despite the earnings recovery, with capex rising sharply and working capital building, leaving free cash

Technology / Software

ENS revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $24.8m, versus $12.5m in HY25.

ENS Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -0.3%, versus 1% in HY25.

ENS operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $0.68m, versus $0.25m in HY25.

ENS working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $0.2m, versus $0.7m in HY25.
Release date
27 February 2025
Published
18 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$12.5m

+21.2% ↑ vs $10.3m

Net profit after tax

$0.2m

+125.0% ↑ vs −$0.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$0.25m

-57.6% ↓ vs $0.59m

Operating profit

$0.12m

+111.5% ↑ vs −$1.1m

Profit before tax

$0.1m

+108.3% ↑ vs −$1.2m

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.4m

-27.8% ↓ vs $1.9m

Total assets

$14.5m

+24.6% ↑ vs $11.6m

What changed

Operating cash flow fell 57.6% to NZD 0.3m against a prior-period NZD 0.6m, and capex jumped from near-zero to NZD 0.3m, pushing free cash flow to -NZD 0.0m — this gap between headline earnings recovery and cash generation is the most important read from this result

Revenue grew 21.2% to NZD 12.5m, driven primarily by Kilimanjaro Consulting (93% of group revenue, up 21.1% to NZD 11.7m), while iSell contributed NZD 0.8m. The group swung from a PBT loss of NZD 1.2m to a profit of NZD 0.1m, and NPAT of NZD 0.2m was aided by a negative effective tax rate of -12.4%, making PBT the cleaner operating read.

Working capital expanded: trade debtors rose 25.2% to NZD 3.2m, and operating working capital increased by NZD 0.7m to NZD 2.2m — outpacing revenue growth and absorbing cash from the P&L improvement.

What matters

Cash conversion is the central quality concern

Operating cash flow of NZD 0.3m is materially below NPAT of NZD 0.2m on a headline basis, but the deeper issue is that receivables grew faster than revenue (debtor days edged up to 47.3 from 45.8) and working capital absorbed NZD 0.7m, meaning the reported earnings improvement did not translate into cash. This matters because the business has cash of only NZD 1.4m, and the seasonal pattern of FY24 saw the second half generate two-thirds of full-year operating cash flow — so the weak first-half cash position is not unusual, but it provides little buffer if the second-half recovery does not materialise.

The tax distortion inflates NPAT versus the operating read. A -12.4% effective tax rate in HY25 versus 26.3% in HY24 lifted NPAT (NZD 0.2m) above PBT (NZD 0.1m). The underlying operating recovery is better represented by the PBT swing from -NZD 1.2m to +NZD 0.1m. Without that tax benefit, the margin of profitability is thin.

The Kilimanjaro / Recipe Marketing acquisition is an early-stage contributor. Kilimanjaro's acquisition of Recipe Marketing (a HubSpot partner) is disclosed as being in the early stages of delivering synergies. The acquisition is reflected in the balance sheet expansion — total assets rose NZD 2.9m to NZD 14.5m — but its revenue and cost contribution to the 21.2% growth rate is not separately quantified in the release, making it impossible to judge the organic component of the result.

Expectations

No formal financial targets have been disclosed, so there is no quantitative benchmark to judge against

Management states the group is currently trading ahead of budget with continued profitability and revenue growth forecast. The FY24 full-year shape provides useful context: HY24 contributed only 47.2% of full-year revenue and the second half generated approximately two-thirds of annual operating cash flow, suggesting the business is structurally second-half weighted. On an annualised basis, HY25 revenue of NZD 12.5m implies a run-rate of approximately NZD 25.0m against FY24's NZD 21.9m.

The key test for the second half is whether the working-capital build reverses into cash and whether the operating leverage achieved at Kilimanjaro is sustained, given the prior year's second half delivered NZD 0.8m of NPAT after a NZD 0.8m first-half loss.

Quality of result

The earnings recovery is real but thin and at this stage only partially supported by cash

PBT of NZD 0.1m on NZD 12.5m of revenue leaves very limited operating margin, and the FCF-to-NPAT ratio of -15.2% confirms cash generation has not kept pace with reported profit. The working-capital build — NZD 0.7m increase in operating working capital and NZD 0.6m increase in trade debtors — is the principal drag. If the second half follows the FY24 pattern and collections improve, the working-capital build could partially reverse; if it does not, the annual cash result will disappoint.

Capex of NZD 0.3m (2.2% of revenue) versus near-zero in HY24 represents a step-up in investment intensity, potentially associated with the Recipe Marketing integration or infrastructure for growth, but the nature of this expenditure is not disclosed in detail.

Unresolved

Open questions

What proportion of the 21.2% revenue growth was organic versus contributed by the Recipe Marketing acquisition, and what revenue run-rate has Recipe Marketing reached?
Why did trade debtors grow 25.2% — faster than revenue — and does this reflect timing of invoicing, slower collections, or new customer payment terms?
What drove the negative effective tax rate of -12.4% and is it expected to normalise in the second half, which would affect NPAT comparisons going forward?
Will corporate costs (NZD 0.4m operating loss in HY25) continue to decline, or does the acquisition integration introduce additional overhead?
Is the NZD 0.3m capex step-up a one-off or an indication of a higher ongoing investment run-rate?

This briefing cannot assess the organic revenue growth rate, the durability of the tax benefit, or the timeline for Recipe Marketing synergies to materialise without further disclosure from management.

Chat

Ask about ENS HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Enprise Group's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about ENS HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Enprise Group's HY25 result.

What proportion of the 21.2% revenue growth was organic versus contributed by the Recipe Marketing acquisition, and what revenue run-rate has Recipe Marketing reached?Why does "Cash conversion is the central quality concern" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for ENS after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Half Year Commentary - 31 Dec 2024

HY25 / results announcement↗

Half Year Commentary - 31 Dec 2024

HY25 / results release↗

Half Year Report - 31 Dec 2024

HY25 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Financial Results Announcement Half Year 31 Dec 2023

HY24 / results announcement↗

Interim Report Dec 2023

HY24 / financial report↗

Full-year context

Annual Report 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 8.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 8.3%, +72.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 21.2% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Debtor days were 47 days for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when ENS publishes next

Get the next Enprise Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.