Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Fletcher Building (FBU) / FY21

Result released18 August 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

FY21 swings to NZ$305m profit as net debt falls to NZ$173m

Revenue rose 11.1% and operating cash flow more than doubled to NZ$889m, funding a sharp deleveraging and a restored 30cps full-year dividend.

Construction & Materials / Building products and construction

FBU metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 17 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$4b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.28

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent EBITDA is negative.

P/FCF

11.2x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.1x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
18 August 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY21 vs FY20

Revenue

$8.1b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$1b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$305m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$889m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Full-year dividend per share

30.0c

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Operating profit

$541m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$433m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$666m

-39.7% ↓ vs $1.1b

Analysis ofFBU FY21·Result released18 August 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Revenue rose 11.1% to NZ$8,120m, and the group swung from a NZ$265m pre-tax loss to a NZ$433m profit before tax

Net profit after tax moved from a NZ$196m loss to NZ$305m, with EBITDA of NZ$1b disclosed for the current period only.

Operating cash flow more than doubled to NZ$889m from NZ$410m, and free cash flow excluding legacy projects was NZ$652m on capex of NZ$231m (2.8% of revenue). Gross borrowings fell 52.1% to NZ$857m and net debt dropped to NZ$173m from NZ$687m, even though cash on hand declined to NZ$666m from NZ$1.1b as drawn facilities were repaid.

The board declared a final dividend of 18cps, taking the full-year FY21 dividend to 30cps versus 23cps in FY20.

What matters

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$764m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$925m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

The swing to profit is genuine rather than tax-flattered. Profit before tax improved 263.4% while NPAT improved 255.6%, a gap of just 7.8 percentage points, so the underlying operating recovery is what is driving the result. Revenue grew across a wider base, with Australia now the largest segment at 34% of revenue and Concrete revenue up to NZ$849m from NZ$503m. The implication is that the recovery is broad rather than concentrated in one cyclical pocket.

Cash generation is the standout. OCF/EBITDA of 86.1% and FCF/NPAT of 213.8% indicate the reported earnings are backed by cash, and inventory days fell to 65.5 from 75.7 while receivable days were unchanged at 37.3. Operating working capital was roughly flat (down NZ$25m), so the cash uplift reflects earnings recovery rather than a working-capital release that would reverse.

Segment quality is uneven. Construction generated a 2.1% margin on NZ$1.5b of revenue and Australia 3.7% on NZ$2.8b, while Residential and Development delivered a 21.0% margin on NZ$734m. The mix means group margin is exposed to whether the lower-margin franchises can lift returns or whether Residential continues to carry the result.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance figures are supplied in the release excerpts, so this briefing assesses the result against the half-year shape rather than against a stated plan

HY21 contributed 49.1% of full-year revenue but only 39.7% of full-year NPAT, implying second-half NPAT of around NZ$184m versus NZ$121m in the first half. The second half therefore carried the margin recovery, which raises the bar for FY22 to demonstrate that the H2 run-rate is sustainable rather than a rebound from COVID-affected H1 comparators.

The 30cps full-year dividend represents an 81.1% payout against NPAT but only 15.2% against free cash flow excluding legacy projects, so distribution capacity looks comfortable on a cash basis even if NPAT normalises.

Quality of result

The result reads as high-quality on the cash and balance-sheet lines

Cash conversion is strong, capex intensity is contained at 2.8% of revenue, and the deleveraging is structural rather than cosmetic: gross debt fell by NZ$934m and net debt by NZ$514m, leaving net debt/EBITDA at 0.17x. ROE swung to 8.1% from -5.5%.

Two caveats temper the read. First, prior-period EBITDA is not disclosed, so the OCF/EBITDA conversion has no comparable benchmark and cannot be characterised as improving or deteriorating versus FY20. Second, segment margins outside Residential and Development and Building Products remain thin, so the group-level recovery depends on volumes and price holding in Construction and Australia. The inventory drawdown also flatters operating cash flow modestly and is unlikely to repeat at the same scale.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the sustainable run-rate EBIT margin in Construction and Australia once cyclical tailwinds normalise?
How much of the H2-weighted NPAT shape reflects pricing power versus one-off cost or volume effects that will not recur?
What is the medium-term capital allocation framework now that net debt/EBITDA sits at 0.17x?
How should investors think about payout policy given the 81.1% NPAT payout versus 37.9% FCF payout?
What legacy project cash outflows remain, and over what timeframe do they unwind?

This briefing cannot assess forward earnings trajectory or management's FY22 plans because no guidance, forward-work figures, or stated targets are disclosed in the supplied material.

Chat

Ask about FBU FY21

Ask follow-up questions about Fletcher Building's FY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about FBU FY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Fletcher Building's FY21 result.

What is the sustainable run-rate EBIT margin in Construction and Australia once cyclical tailwinds normalise?Why does "Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$764m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY21?What should I watch next for FBU after FY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY21 / results presentation↗

News Release

FY21 / media release↗

Results Announcement

FY21 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Amendment to 2020 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

Interim context

2021 Interim Financial Results

HY21 / financial report↗

News Release HY21

HY21 / media release↗

Results Announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

Release context

Fletcher Building FY21 Results Webcast Details

FY21 / commentary↗

Fletcher Building Investor Day Presentation

FY21 / commentary↗

Virtual Investor Day

FY21 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 7.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 86.1% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 15.2%, with NPAT payout at 81.1%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.17x for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when FBU publishes next

Get the next Fletcher Building briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.